Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T05:19:34.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ichthyosporidium Hoferi (Plehn & Mulsow, 1911), An Internal Fungoid Parasite of the Mackerel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Nora G. Sproston
Nora G. Sproston
Affiliation:
Keddey Fletcher-Warr Student, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A fungus has been found causing a fatal disease among mackerel in British waters, and a very high rate of infection has been maintained for over three years. It is spread throughout the viscera by the circulation, being particularly common in the kidney and spleen: it is very rare in the muscles and has never been found in the gonads or central nervous system of these fish.

Growth of the aseptate, sparsely branched hyphae is usually radial, from one of three types of central body. The length and thickness of the hyphae varies according to the density of the infected tissue and the degree of resistance which is set up. Connective tissue capsules are laid down round spores and hyphal bodies, occluding the small vessels or capillaries in which they become lodged. Growth of the parasite stretches the capsule, which may become a tubular gallery containing many growth stages. This may effectively seal the parasites which then degenerate; or, more usually, the strong proteolytic enzymes secreted by the advancing hyphae perforate it, and proceed to convert the whole organ into a necrotic mass in which hyphae grow to great lengths. There is always a tendency for hyphal walls to collapse behind the outgrowing hyphae, giving the appearance of hair-like threads with swollen ends.

Any of the following developments may occur, apparently on any hypha, in tissue undergoing necrosis: (1) Bunches of large elongated chlamydospores, with a very hard exospore and a thick (?) gelatinous endospore—a germination pore is present; (2) Single dome-shaped conidia (like those of Entomophthoraceae); (3) Hyphal bodies of various shapes, either growing at once where they become lodged or becoming rounded and encysted—these may subdivide irregularly, each spherule having a separate cyst; (4) Branched conidiophores with rounded tips which contain endo-conidia—liberated as minute amoeboid bodies into the blood vessels; (5) Simple clavate sporangia from the ends of unbranched hyphae, also containing endo-conidia; (6) Hyphal fusions of numerous kinds, immediately proceeding to further outgrowths of similar hyphae; (7) ‘Spores produced by hyphal fusion’: fusion of two hyphae followed by the participation of neighbouring hyphae which also contribute to form the outer, resistant, rugose wall.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , September 1944 , pp. 72 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexeieff, A., 1914. Sur le cycle evolutif d'une haplosporidie (Ichthyosporidium gasterophilum Caullery & Mesnil). Arch. Zool. Exper. et Gen., T. LIV, pp. 30–44, figs. 1–4.Google Scholar
Ashworth, J. H., 1923. On Rhinosporidium seeberi (Wernicke, 1903), with special reference to its sporulation and affinities. Trans. Roy. Soc, Edinburgh, Vol. LIII, pp. 301–42, 5 pls.Google Scholar
Atkins, D., 1929. On a fungus allied to the Saprolegniaceae found in the pea-crab, Pinnotheres. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. xvi, pp. 203–19, figs. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, G. N., 1900. Lymphosphoridium truttae nov. gen., nov. sp., the cause of a recent epidemic among brook trout,Salvelinus fontinalis. Zool. Anz., Bd. XXIII, pp. 513–20, figs. 1–6.Google Scholar
Caullery, M. & Mesnil, F., 1905. Recherches sur les Haplosporidies. Arch. Zool. Exper. et Gen. (4c ser.), T. IV, pp. 101–81, pl. 13.Google Scholar
Chatton, E., 1906. Sur la biologie, la specification et la position systematique des Amoebidium. Arch. Zool. Exper. et Gen. (4c ser.), Notes et Rev., T. V, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
Chipman, H. R. & Langstroth, G. O., 1930. Some measurements of the heat-capacity of fish muscle. Proc. and Trans. Nova Scotian Inst. Sci., Vol. XVII, pp. 175–84Google Scholar
Cox, P., 1916. Investigations of a disease of the herring (Clupea harengus) in the Gulf of St Lawrence. Contrib. to Canadian Biol. 1914–1915, pp. 81–85, 2 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, G. E., 1933 a. Studies onIchthyophonus hoferi, a parasitic fungus of the herring (Clupea harengus). I. The parasite as it is found in the herring. Amer. Journ. Hyg., Vol XVII, pp. 267–76, figs. 1–15.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. E. 1933 b. Idem. II. The gross and microscopic lesions produced by the parasite. Amer. Journ. Hyg., Vol. XVII, pp. 491–501.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, P., 1916. Coelomycidium simulii nov.gen., nov.spec, et remarques sur V'Amoebidium des larves de Simulium. La Cellule, T. XXX, pp. 249–67.Google Scholar
Ellis, M. F., 1930 a. Ichthyophonus hoferi Plehn & Mulsow, a flounder parasite new to North American waters. Proc. and Trans. Nova Scotian Inst. Sci., Vol. XVII, pp. 185–92, figs. 1–12.Google Scholar
Ellis, M. F., 1930 b. Protozoan fish parasites of the Saint Andrews region. Proc. and Trans. Nova Scotian Inst. Sci., Vol. XVII, p. 268.Google Scholar
Fish, F. W., 1934. A fungus disease in fishes of the Gulf of Maine. Parasitology, Vol. XXVI, pp. 1–16, figs. I–II, pl. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischthal, J., 1944. Observations on a sporozoan parasite of the eelpout, Zoarces anguillaris, with an evaluation of candling methods for its detection. Journ. Parasitol., Vol. XXX, pp. 35–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwynne-Vaughan, H. I. C. & Barnes, B., 1937. The Structure and Development of the Fungi. 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hofer, B., 1893. Eine Salmoidenkrankung. Allgemeine Fischerei-Zeit., N.F., Bd. VII, p. 168.Google Scholar
Hofer, B. 1904. Handbuch der Fischkrankheiten. München.Google Scholar
Hofer, B. 1906. Handbuch der Fischkrankheiten. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Jepps, M. W., 1937. On the protozoan parasites of Calanus finmarchicus in the Clyde Sea Area. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., Vol. LXXIX, pp. 589–658, figs. 1–28, pls. 25–28.Google Scholar
Johnstone, J., 1906. Internal parasites and diseased conditions of fishes: 3. Fungi. Trans. Biol. Soc, Liverpool, Vol. xx, pp. 179–85, pl. 16.Google Scholar
Johnstone, J. 1913. Diseased conditions of fishes: a phycomycetous fungus in a mackerel (Scomber scomber). Trans. Biol. Soc, Liverpool, Vol. XXVII, pp. 28–33, pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
Johnstone, J. 1920. On certain parasites, diseased and abnormal conditions of fishes. Report for 1919, Lane. Sea-Fish. Lab., No. XXXVIII, pp. 24–33, figs. i–iiGoogle Scholar
Keilin, D. 1921. On a new type of fungus,Coelomomyces stegomyiae n.g., n.sp., parasitic in the body cavity of the larvae of Stegomyia scutellaris Walker (Diptera, Nematocera, Culicidae). Parasitology, Vol. XIII, pp. 225–34, figs. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschenblatt, J. D., 1939. A new parasite of the lungs in rodents. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. T. XXIII, pp. 406–8, figs. 1–2.Google Scholar
Laveran, A. & Pettit, A., 1910. Sur une epizootie des truites. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, T. CLI, pp. 421–3.Google Scholar
Lavier, G., 1938. Sur un protophyte parasite intestinal de poisson marin. Ann. Parasitol., T. XVI, pp. 259–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Léger, L., 1924. Sur un organisme du type Ichthyophone parasite du tube digestif de la Lote d'eau douce. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, T. CLXXIX, p. 785.Google Scholar
Léger, L., 1927. Sur la nature et revolution des spherules decrites chez les Ichthyophonus parasites de la truite. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, T. CLXXX, p. 1268.Google Scholar
Léger, L., 1929 a. Obstruction stomachale chez la truite par une formation mycetogene d'origine alimentaire. Ann. Univ. Grenoble (N.S.), Sci. Med., T. VI, pp. 79–85, figs. 1–6, pls. I—II.Google Scholar
Léger, L., 1929 b. Sur la nature et revolution des spherules decrites chez les Ichthyophonus phycomycetes parasites de la truite. Ann. Univ. Grenoble (N.S.), Sci. Med., T. VI, pp. 133–7, figs. 1–10Google Scholar
Léger, L., & Duboscq, O., 1909. Sur les Chytridiopsis et leur évolution. Arch. Zool. Expér. et Gén. (5c sér.), Notes et Rev., T. I, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
Léger, L., & Hesse, E., 1923. Sur un champignon du type Ichthyophonus parasite de l'intestin de la truite. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, T. CLXXVI, pp. 420–2.Google Scholar
Neresheimer, E. & Clodi, C., 1914. Ichthyophonus hoferi Plehn & Mulsow, der Erriger des Taumelkrankheit der Salmoniden. Arch. Parasitenk., Bd. XXXIV, pp. 217–48,figs. 1–15, pls. 15–17.Google Scholar
Ou, S. H., 1940. Phycomycetes of China. I. Sinensia, Vol. xi, pp. 33–57, pls. 1–5.Google Scholar
Pettit, A., 1913. Observations sur l'Ichthyosporidium et sur la maladie qu'il provoque chez la truite. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Paris, T. XXVII, pp. 986–1008, pls. 13–14.Google Scholar
Plehn, M. & Mulsow, K., 1911. Der Erriger der ‘Taumelkrankheiten’ der Salmoniden. Cent. f. Bakt. Parasitenk., Bd. LIX, pp. 63–8, figs. 1–6, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Riddell, W. & Alexander, D. M., 1911. Note on a ulcerative disease of the plaice. Proc. and Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc., Vol. XXVI, p. 155.Google Scholar
Robertson, M., 1908. Notes upon a Haplosporidian belonging to the genus Ichthyosporidium. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc, Edinburgh, Vol. XVII, pp. 175–87, pls. 9–10.Google Scholar
Robertson, M., 1909. Notes on an Ichthyosporidium causing fatal disease in sea trout. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 399–402 ls. 63–64.Google Scholar
Savouré, P., 1905. Recherches expérimentales sur les Mycoses internes et leurs parasites. Arch, de Parasitol., T. x, pp. 5–70, figs. 1–12.Google Scholar
Sawyer, W. H., 1929. Observations on some entomogenous members of the Entomophthoraceae in artificial culture. Amer. Journ. Bot., Vol. xvi, pp. 87–121, pls. 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, W. H., 1933. The development of Entomophthora sphaerosperma upon Rhopobota vacciniana. Ann. Bot., Vol. XLVII, pp. 799–809, pls. 28–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speare, A. T., 1921. Massospora cicadina Peck, a fungus parasite of the periodical cicada. Mycologia, Vol. xiii, pp. 72–82, pls. 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speare, A. T., 1922. Natural control of the citrus mealy bug in Florida. U.S. Dept. Agric. Bull., No. 1117, pp. 1–18, figs. 1–21.Google Scholar
Stansby, M. E. & Lemon, J. M., 1941. Studies on the handling of fresh mackerel (Scomber scombrus). U.S. Dept. Interior: Fish and Wild Life Service, Research Repts., No. 1, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Thaxter, R., 1888. The Entomophthoraceae of the United States. Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. IV, pp. 133–201, pls. 14–21.Google Scholar
Williamson, H. C., 1913. Report on diseases and abnormalities in fishes: Dokus adus an intra-capillary parasite of fish. Rept. Fish. Bd. Scotland (Sci. Investigations) (1911) II, pp. 4–11, pls. 1–8,Google Scholar