Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:41:00.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homing Ability and Home Range of Yellow-Phase American Eels in a Tidally Dominated Estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

S.J. Parker
S.J. Parker
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, 5751 Murray Hall, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469–5751, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Yellow-phase American eels, Anguilla rostrata, were displaced 10–17 km between tidal fresh water and salinity-stratified water and followed to determine the degree of home site fidelity, swiftness of homing and whether environmental factors affect orientation or homing behaviour. Twenty-one eels were tracked continuously (eight eels displaced up the estuary, eight down the estuary and five controls) in the Penobscot Estuary, Maine, USA for 4–80 h each, while recording position every 20 min. Nine of the 16 displaced eels (56%) returned to their capture site either during the track or shortly afterwards. Three of the remaining seven eels made substantial progress towards their capture site within the time observed. Eels homed with equal frequency whether displaced up or down the estuary in an average of 220 h ±87 (SE). After release, no eel moved farther away from its capture site. The eels were active mostly at night but used only the appropriate tidal currents rather than directed swimming to move about their home range and to home. Control tracks provided a home-range estimate in this habitat of 6.7 ±1.6 km of estuary or 325 ±64 ha. Lunar phase or position of the moon did not appear to influence either homing behaviour or activity patterns. This study shows that orientation and homing to a specific site in eels occurs relatively quickly and with no initial errors in orientation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 127 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aker, V.E. & Koops, H., 1973. Untersuchungen über Aalbestande in der Deutschen Bucht. Archive für Fischereiwissenschaft, 24, 19–39.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 1990. Tide tables 1991, high and low water predictions; east coast of North and South America, including Greenland. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.Google Scholar
Arnold, G.P., 1981. Movements of fish in relation to water currents. In Animal migration (ed. D.J., Aidley), pp. 55–79. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Avise, J.C., Helfman, G.S., Saunders, N.C. & Hales, L.S., 1986. Mitochondrial DNA differentiation in North Atlantic eels: population genetic consequences of an unusual life history pattern. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 83, 4350–4354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beumer, J.P., 1979. Feeding and movement of Anguilla australis and A. reinhardtii in Macleods Morass, Victoria, Australia. Journal of Fish Biology, 14, 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, E.L., Helfman, G.S. & Richardson, T., 1985. Population size and home range of American eels in a Georgia tidal creek. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 114, 821–825.Google Scholar
Deelder, C.L. & Tesch, F.-W., 1970. Heimfindevermogen von Aalen (Anguilla anguilla), die über groβe Entfernungen verpflanzt worden waren. Marine Biology, 6, 81–92.Google Scholar
Dutil, J.D., Giroux, A., Kemp, A., Lavoie, G. & Dallaire, J.P., 1988. Tidal influence on movements and on daily cycle of activity of American eels. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 117, 488–494.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, T.E. & Mercer, E., 1986. Density, size distribution and home range of American eels, Anguilla rostrata, in a Massachusetts salt marsh. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 17, 309–314.Google Scholar
Greer, Walker M., Harden, Jones F.R. & Arnold, G.P. 1978. The movements of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) tracked in the open sea. Journal du Conseil, 38, 58–86.Google Scholar
Gunning, G.E. & Shoop, C.R., 1962. Restricted Movements Of The American Eel, Anguilla Rostrata (Lesueur), In Freshwater Streams, With Comments On Growth Rate. Tulane Studies in Zoology. New Orleans, 9, 265–272.Google Scholar
Helfman, G.S., Stoneburner, D.L., Bozeman, E.L., Christian, P.A. & Whalen, R., 1983. Ultrasonic telemetry of American eel movements in a tidal creek. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 112, 105–110.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, D.A., 1972. The American eel (Anguilla rostrata) in eastern Lake Ontario. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 29, 535–543.Google Scholar
Johnsen, P.B., 1984. Establishing the physiological and behavioral determinants of chemosensory orientation. In Mechanisms of migration in fishes (ed. J.D., McCleave et al.), pp. 379–385. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Labar, G.W., Casal, J. A. & Delgado, C.F., 1987. Local movements and population size of European eels (Anguilla anguilla) in a small lake in south-western Spain. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 19, 111–117.Google Scholar
Labar, G.W. & Facey, D.E., 1983. Local movements and inshore population sizes of American eels in Lake Champlain, Vermont. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 112, 111–116.Google Scholar
Lehner, P.N., 1979. Handbook of ethological methods, New York: Garland STPM Press.Google Scholar
Mann, H., 1965. Über das Rückkehrvermogen verpflanzter Fluβ-Aale. Archive für Fischereiwissenschaft, 15, 177–185.Google Scholar
McCleave, J.D. & Fried, S.M., 1975. Night-time catches of fishes in a tidal cove in Montsweag Bay near Wiscasset, Maine. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 104, 30–34.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, J.D., Arnold, G.P., & Webb, P.W., 1990. The energetics of migration by selective tidal stream transport: an analysis for plaice tracked in the southern North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 70, 149–162.Google Scholar
Rossi, R., Bianchini, M., Carrieri, A. & Franzoi, P., 1987. Observations on movements of yellow eels, Anguilla anguilla L., after displacement from coastal waters to sea. Journal of Fish Biology, 31, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, P.W., Bianchini, M.L. & Winn, H.E., 1986. Diel foraging activity of American eels, Anguilla rostrata (Lesueur), in a Rhode Island estuary. Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, DC, 84, 746–747.Google Scholar
Stasko, A.B. & Rommel, S.A., 1977. Ultrasonic tracking of Atlantic salmon and eels. Rapport et Procèsverbaux des Réunions. Conseil Permanent International pour I'Exploration de la Mer, 170, 36–40.Google Scholar
Tesch, F.-W., 1967. Homing of eels (Anguilla anguilla) in the southern North Sea. Marine Biobgy, 1, 2–9.Google Scholar
Tesch, F.-W., 1970. Heimfindevermögen von Aalen Anguilla anguilla nach Beeinträchtigung des Geruchssinnes, nach Adaptation oder nach Verpflanzung in ein Nachbar-Ästuar. Marine Biology, 6, 148–157.Google Scholar
Tesch, F.-W., 1974. Speed and direction of silver and yellow eels, Anguilla anguilla, released and tracked in the open North Sea. Berichte der Deutschen Wissenschaftlichen Kommission für Meeresforschung, 23, 181–197.Google Scholar
Tesch, F.-W., 1975. Migratory behaviour of displaced homing yellow eels (Anguilla anguilla) in the North Sea. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 27, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesch, F.-W., 1977. The eel: biology and management of anguillid eels (ed. P.H., Greenwood), pp. 208–220. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Tesch, F.-W., Westerberg, H. & Karlsson, L., 1991. Tracking studies on migrating silver eels in the Central Baltic. Meeresforschung, 33, 185–196.Google Scholar
Vladykov, V.D., 1971. Homing of the American eel, Anguilla rostrata, as evidenced by returns of transplanted tagged eels in New Brunswick. Canadian Field Naturalist, 85, 241–248.Google Scholar
Vøllestad, L.A., 1988. Tagging experiments with yellow eel, Anguilla anguilla (L.), in brackish water in Norway. Sarsia, 73, 157–161.Google Scholar
Weihs, D., 1978. Tidal stream transport as an efficient method for migration. Journal du Conseil, 38, 92–99.Google Scholar
Winter, J.D., 1977. Summer home range movements and habitat use by four largemouth bass in Mary Lake, Minnesota. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 106, 323–330.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar