Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T00:11:37.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and reproductive cycle of Hypermastus tokunagai (Caenogastropoda: Eulimidae), an ectoparasite of the sand dollar Scaphechinus mirabilis (Clypeasteroida: Scutellidae) in the Seto Inland Sea, Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2012

Haruna Matsuda ,
Tatsuo Hamano  and
Kazuya Nagasawa
Haruna Matsuda*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, 1-4-4 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan
Tatsuo Hamano
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Aquabiology, National Fisheries University, 2-7-1 Nagata-Honmachi, Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi 759-6595, Japan
Kazuya Nagasawa
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, 1-4-4 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: H. Matsuda, Institute of Socio-Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokushima, 1-1 Minamijyosanjima-cho, Tokushima, Tokushima 770-8502, Japan email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hypermastus tokunagai is a eulimid gastropod infecting the sand dollar Scaphechinus mirabilis. The eulimid is easily detached from the host and thus regarded as a temporary parasite. In this study, the growth and reproductive cycle of H. tokunagai were investigated using specimens collected from S. mirabilis in the western Seto Inland Sea, Japan. Newly recruited individuals of H. tokunagai appeared in early autumn and grew rapidly, while growth was retarded from mid-autumn to winter months. A second rapid growth occurred the following summer. Based on the growth pattern, the life span of H. tokunagai was estimated to be more than 20 months. This longer life span compared to other eulimids could be due to the accessibility and population stability of its host S. mirabilis. Maturation of H. tokunagai occurred within a short period in the summer, and was synchronized with the second growth phase. Hypermastus tokunagai showed size dimorphism between sexes and an investigation on change in shell shape with growth revealed that this characteristic can be attributed to the female's acquisition of a larger shell within a short time during its maturation period.

Keywords

Eulimidaegrowth patternparasitic snailreproductive cyclesand dollar
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , June 2013 , pp. 1041 - 1051
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bouchet, P. and Warén, A. (1986) Revision of the northeast Atlantic bathyal and abyssal Aclididae, Eulimidae, Epitoniidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Bollettino Malacologico, Supplemento 2, 299–576.Google Scholar
Crossland, M.R., Alford, R.A. and Collins, J.D. (1991) Population dynamics of an ectoparasitic gastropod, Hypermastus sp. (Eulimidae), on the sand dollar, Arachnoides placenta (Echinoidea). Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 42, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, H.Y. (1979) Studies on the host parasite relationship between the parasitic prosobranch Thyca crystallina and the asteroid starfish Linckia laevigata. Journal of Zoology 187, 369–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekaratne, S.U.K. and Crisp, D.J. (1984) Seasonal growth studies of intertidal gastropods from shell micro-growth band measurements, including a comparison with alternative methods. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 64, 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujioka, Y. (1985) Population ecological aspects of the eulimid gastropod Vitreobalcis temnopleuricola. Malacologia 26, 153–163.Google Scholar
González-Vallejo, N.E. (2008) Parasitism of Monogamus minibulla (Olsson and McGinty, 1958) (Gastropoda: Eulimidae) on the red sea-urchin Echinometra lucunter (Linnaeus, 1758) (Echinodermata: Echinometridae) on the Caribbean coast of Mexico. Nautilus 122, 178–181.Google Scholar
Gooding, R.U. and Lützen, J. (1973) Studies on parasitic gastropods from echinoderms. III. A description of Robillardia cernica Smith 1889, parasitic in the sea urchin Echinometra Meuschen, with notes on its biology. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter 20, 1–22.Google Scholar
Heller, J. (1993) Hermaphroditism in molluscs. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 48, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskin, G.P. and Warén, A. (1983) Peasistilifer edulis, a new eulimid prosobranch, parasitic on an Indo-Pacific holothurian. Nautilus 97, 23–26.Google Scholar
Humphreys, W.F. and Lützen, J. (1972) Studies on parasitic gastropods from echinoderms. 1. On the structure and biology of the parasitic gastropod Megadenus cantharelloides n. sp., with comparisons on Paramegadenus n. g. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter 19, 1–27.Google Scholar
Hughes, R.N. (1986) A functional biology of marine gastropods. London and Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Jangoux, M. (1990) Diseases of Echinodermata. In Kinne, O. (ed.) Diseases of marine animals, Volume III, Introduction, Cephalopoda, Annelida, Crustacea, Chaetognatha, Echinodermata, Urochordata. Hamburg: Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, pp. 439–567.Google Scholar
Kawai, T. and Nagasawa, K. (2006) Host body size, prevalence, and breeding season of the microparasitic snail Pelseneeria castanea on the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus in coastal waters of the Sea of Japan off western Hokkaido, Japan. Japanese Journal of Benthology 61, 16–20. [In Japanese with English abstract.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuramochi, T. (2003) Preliminary report on the life history of Melanella yamazii (Gastropoda: Mollusca) parasitic on Holothuria (Selenkothuria) moebii (Holothuroidea: Echinodermata) from Sagami Bay, Central Japan. The Nanki Seibutu 45, 150–152. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Lützen, J. (1972) Studies on parasitic gastropods from echinoiderms. II. On Stilifer Broderip, with special reference to the structure of the sexual apparatus and the reproduction. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter 19, 1–18, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Lützen, J. and Nielsen, K. (1975) Contributions to the anatomy and biology of Echineulima n. g. (Prosobranchia: Eulimidae), parasitic on sea urchins. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 138, 171–199.Google Scholar
Matsuda, H., Hamano, T., Yamamoto, K. and Hori, S. (2008) Ecological study of Hypermastus tokunagai (Gastropoda: Eulimidae), parasitic on the sand dollar Scaphechinus mirabilis (Echinoidea: Irregularia). Venus 66, 205–216.Google Scholar
Matsuda, H., Hamano, T., Hori, S. and Nagasawa, K. (2010) Redescriptions and attachment modes of Hypermastus peronellicola and H. tokunagai (Prosobranchia: Eulimidae), ectoparasites of sand dollars (Echinodermata: Clypeasteroidea) in Japanese waters. Venus 69, 25–39.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, M., Ito, A., Noda, T. and Nakao, S. (1995) Seasonal patterns in growth of Nodilittorina exigua (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) at Kattoshi, southern Hokkaido. Venus 54, 49–56. [In Japanese with English abstract.]Google Scholar
Morton, B. (1979) The population dynamics and expression of sexuality in Balcis shaplandi [sic; = shoplandi] and Mucronalia fulvescens (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Aglossa) parasitic upon Archaster typicus (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Malacologia 18, 327–346.Google Scholar
Orton, J.H. (1920) Sea-temperature, breeding and distribution in marine animals. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 12, 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, T. (2008) Micromolluscs in Japan: taxonomic composition, habitats, and future topics. Zoosymposia 1, 147–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steimie, F.W. (1989) Population dynamics, growth, and production estimates for the sand dollar Echinarachnius parma. Fishery Bulletin 88, 179–189.Google Scholar
Takano, M. (1932) [Biometrical study of some gastropods] (trans. auct.). Doubutsugaku zasshi 44, 100–108. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Uki, N. (1989) Sexual maturation, development, and growth in gastropods, and their control. In Takashima, F. and Hanyu, I. (eds) Reproductive biology of fish and shellfish. Tokyo: Midori Shobo, pp. 367–417. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Warén, A. (1980a) Revision of the genera Thyca, Stilifer, Scalenostoma, Mucronalia and Echineulima (Mollusca, Prosobranchia, Eulimidae). Zoologica Scripta 9, 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warén, A. (1980b) Descriptions of new taxa of Eulimidae (Mollusca, Prosobranchia), with notes on some previously described genera. Zoologica Scripta 9, 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warén, A. (1981) Revision of the genera Apicalia A. Adams and Stilapex Iredale and description of two new genera (Mollusca, Prosobranchia, Eulimidae). Zoologica Scripta 10, 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warén, A. (1984a) A generic revision of the family Eulimidae (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Journal of Molluscan Studies Supplement 13, 1–96.Google Scholar
Warén, A. (1984b) Sexual strategies in Eulimidae (Prosobranchia). Symposium on molluscs (Journal of the Malacological Society of Australia) 4, 231.Google Scholar
Warén, A. (1992) Comments on and descriptions of eulimid gastropods from tropical west America. Veliger 35, 177–194.Google Scholar
Warén, A. and Crossland, M.R. (1991) Revision of Hypermastus Pilsbry, 1899 and Turveria Berry, 1956 (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia: Eulimidae), two genera parasitic on sand dollars. Records of the Australian Museum 43, 85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warén, A. and Moolenbeek, R. (1989) A new eulimid gastropod, Trochostilifer eucidoricola, parasitic on the pencil urchin Eucidaris tribuloides from the southern Caribbean. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 102, 169–175.Google Scholar
Warén, A., Norris, D.R. and Templado, J. (1994) Descriptions of four new eulimid gastropods parasitic on irregular sea urchins. Veliger 37, 141–154.Google Scholar