Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:10:10.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geometric morphometric analysis discriminates native and non-native species of Caprellidae in western North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Eva I. Riedlecker ,
Gail V. Ashton  and
Gregory M. Ruiz
Eva I. Riedlecker
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, MD 21037, US Department of Theoretical Biology and Morphology, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria
Gail V. Ashton*
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, MD 21037, US
Gregory M. Ruiz
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, MD 21037, US
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Gail V. Ashton, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, MD 21037, US email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Characteristics of the second gnathopod are traditionally used to distinguish between species of caprellid amphipods. However, these distinctions are often subjective and can be variable within a species. Geometric morphometrics were used to quantitatively assess shape variation of the second gnathopod propodus of three species of caprellids in North America, including the non-native Caprella mutica. Gnathopod shapes of C. mutica specimens from different latitudes revealed distinct morphologies; the factors responsible for the shape variations are unknown. Allometric change of propodus shape was observed in C. mutica. Larger individuals showed a wide array of possible propodus morphologies. Despite this variability, there were clear differences between large specimens of C. mutica and two species native to North America: C. alaskana and C. kennerlyi. The use of geometric morphometrics and the thin-plate spline method can serve to both complement descriptions using traditional keys and aid in identification of non-native species in novel geographical regions.

Keywords

allometryamphipodCaprella muticalatitudinal variationmorphologyshape
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , May 2009 , pp. 535 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arimoto, I. (1976) Taxonomic studies of caprellids (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Caprellidae) found in the Japanese adjacent waters. Special Publications from the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory Series III. Osaka, Japan: Nippon Printing & Publishing Co., Ltd. 111.Google Scholar
Ashton, G.V. (2006) Distribution and dispersal of the non-native caprellid amphipod, Caprella mutica Schurin 1935. PhD thesis. Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Scotland.Google Scholar
Ashton, G.V., Willis, K.J., Cook, E.J. and Burrows, M.T. (2007) Distribution of the introduced amphipod, Caprella mutica Schurin on the west coast of Scotland and a review of its global distribution. Hydrobiologia 590, 31–41.Google Scholar
Bookstein, F.L. (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bookstein, F.L. (1997) Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis 1, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bynum, K.H. (1980) Multivariate assessment of morphological variation in Caprella penantis Leach, 1814 (Amphipoda: Caprellidae). Estuarine, Coastal and Marine Science 10, 225–237.Google Scholar
Cadrin, S.X. (1995) Discrimination of the American lobster (Homarus americanus) stocks off southern New England on the basis of secondary sexual character allometry. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 52, 2712–2723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadrin, S.X. (2000) Advances in morphometric identification of fishery stocks. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 10, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caine, E.A. (1974) A comparative functional morphology of feeding in three species of caprellids (Crustacea, Amphipioda) from the northwestern Florida Gulf coast. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 15, 81–96.Google Scholar
Caine, E.A. (1977) Feeding mechanisms and possible resource partitioning of the Caprellidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from Puget Sound, USA. Marine Biology 42, 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caine, E.A. (1989) Relationship between wave activity and robustness of caprellid amphipods. Journal of Crustacean Biology 9, 425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, J.T. (ed.) (2007) The Light and Smith manual: intertidal invertebrates from central California to Oregon, 4th edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claverie, T. and Smith, I.P. (2007) Functional significance of an unusual chela dimorphism in a marine decapod: specialization as a weapon? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274, 3033–3038.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. and Jaramillo, E. (2003) Geographical variation in natural history of the sandy beach isopod Excirolana hirsuticauda Menzies (Cirolanidae) on the Chilean coast. Estuarine, Coastal and Marine Science 58S, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugan, J.E., Hubbard, D.M. and Wenner, A.M. (1994) Geographic variation in life history of the sand crab Emerita analoga (Stimpson) on the California coast: relationships to environmental variables. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 181, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faasse, M. (2005) Notes on diagnostic characters and morphological variability of Caprella mutica Schurin, 1935 in The Netherlands (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Caprellidea). Het Zeepaard 65, 22–28.Google Scholar
Frank, P.W. (1975) Latitudinal variation in the life history features of the black turban snail Tegula funebralis (Prosobranchia: Trochiddae). Marine Biology 31, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J. and Ryland, J.S. (eds) (2000) Handbook of the marine fauna of north-west Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huey, R.B., Gilchrist, G.W. and Hendry, A.P. (2005) Using invasive species to study evolution: case studies with Drosophila and salmon. In Sax, D.F., Stachowicz, J.J. and Gaines, G.S. (eds) Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, pp. 139–164.Google Scholar
Inglis, G., Gust, M., Fitridge, I., Floerl, O., Woods, C., Hayden, B. and Fenwick, G. (2006) Port of Timaru: baseline survey for non-indigenous species. Biosecurity New Zealand Technical Paper No. 2005/06. ISBN No: 0-478-07902-8.Google Scholar
Kozloff, E.N. (1993) Seashore life of the northern pacific coast. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Laubitz, D.R. (1970) Studies on the Caprellidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda) of the American North Pacific. National Museum of Canada.Google Scholar
Mayer, P. (1903) Die Caprellidae der Siboga-Expedition. Siboga-Expeditie, Monographie 34, 1–160.Google Scholar
Müller, J.C., Schramm, S. and Seitz, A. (2002) Genetic and morphological differentiation of Dikerogammarus invaders and their invasion history in Central Europe. Freshwater Biology 47, 2039–2048.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, M. (2006) The Japanese macho skeleton shrimp (Caprella mutica) in the Clyde Estuary. The Glasgow Naturalist 24, 156–157.Google Scholar
Platvoet, D., de Bruyne, R.H. and Gmelig Meyling, A.W. (1995) Description of a new Caprella-species from the Netherlands: Caprella macho nov. spec. (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Caprellidae). Bulletin of the Zoological Museum, University of Amsterdam 15, 1–4.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F.J. (1999) Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification 16, 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlf, F.J. (2005a) tpsRegr, thin-plate spline regression, version 1.31. Stony Brook, NY: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F.J. (2005b) tpsRelw, relative warps analysis, version 1.44. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F.J. (2006) tpsDig2, digitize landmarks and outlines, version 2.10. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F.J. and Marcus, L.F. (1993) A revolution morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 129–132.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M.S. (2002) Fiddler crab claw shape variation: a geometric morphometric analysis across the genus Uca (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 75, 147–162.Google Scholar
Rufino, M.M., Abello, P. and Yule, A.B. (2006) Geographic and gender shape differences in the carapace of Liocarcinus depurator (Brachyura: Portunidae) using geometric morphometrics and the influence of a digitizing method. Journal of Zoology 269, 458–465.Google Scholar
Saila, S.B. and Martin, B.K. (1987) A brief review and guide to some multivariate methods for stock identification. In Kumpf, H.E., Vaught, R.N., Grimes, C.B., Johnson, A.G. and Nakamura, E.L. (eds) Proceedings of the Stock Identification Workshop. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS–SEFC 199, 149–175.Google Scholar
Slice, D.E. (2005) Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L.D. (2004) Biogeographic differences in claw size and performance in an introduced crab predator Carcinus maenas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 276, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.I. and Carlton, J.T. (eds) (1975) Light's manual: intertidal invertebrates of the central California coast. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
StatSoft Inc (2001) STATISTICA for Windows (data analysis software system), version 6 (http://www.statsoft.com).Google Scholar
USGS (2005) Nonindigenous aquatic species database. Gainesville, FL. http://nas.er.usgs.gov.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G.J. (1978) Biogeography and adaptation: patterns of marine life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wasson, K., Von Holle, B., Toft, J. and Ruiz, G. (2000) Detecting invasions of marine organisms: kamptozoan case histories. Biological Invasions 2, 59–74.Google Scholar
Willis, K.J., Cook, E.J., Lozano-Fernandez, M. and Takeuchi, I. (2004) First record of the alien caprellid amphipod, Caprella mutica, for the UK. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 84, 1027–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, W.J. (2005) Non-indigenous marine and estuarine species in The Netherlands. Zoologische Mededelingen 79, 1–116.Google Scholar
Zelditch, M., Swiderski, D., Sheets, D.H. and Fink, W. (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. London: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar