Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:37:21.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food and Feeding Habits of Luidia Ciliaris Echinodermata: Asteroidea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Einar Brun
Einar Brun
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Station, Port Erin, Isle of Man
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Luidia ciliaris (Philippi) has intraoral digestion and was found to be a selective feeder on echinoderms. In 258 specimens from the Irish Sea, echinoderms occurred in 97·4% of all stomachs containing food and contributed 92% of the food volume (estimated by points method). The most important food items were Psammechinus miliaris, Ophiothrix fragilis, Ophiura albida and Ophiocomina nigra. Ophiocomina nigra did not occur as frequently as would be expected from their availability. Observation in situ revealed that large specimens had efficient escape response to moving Luidia and aquarium experiments showed that O. nigra deprived of their moving ability were readily eaten. However, the Luidia showed clear preference to Ophiothrix fragilis. There was no distinct seasonal difference in the composition of the diet, but a tendency to a minimum feeding activity in May-June, probably connected with the spawning period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , February 1972 , pp. 225 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brun, E. 1969. Aggregation of Ophiothrix fragilis (Abildgaard) (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Nytt Mag. Zool., Vol. 17, pp. 153–60.Google Scholar
Dons, C. 1937. Die Verbreitung von Luidia ciliaris. K. norske Vidensk. Selsk. Forh., Bd. 9, pp. 149–52.Google Scholar
Fell, H. B. 1966. The ecology of ophiuroids. In Physiology of Echinodermata (ed. R. A. Boolootian), pp. 129–43. New York.Google Scholar
Fenchel, T. 1965. Feeding biology of the sea-star Luidia sarsi Düben & Koren. Ophelia, Vol. 2, pp. 223–36.Google Scholar
Fontaine, A. R. 1964. The integumentary mucous secretion of the ophiuroid Ophiocomina nigra. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 145–62.Google Scholar
Gruffydd, L. D. 1966. Report on the 1965 search for scallop (Pecten maximus) beds in the North Irish Sea. Rep. mar. biol. Stn Port Erin, Vol. 78, pp. 35–41.Google Scholar
Hulings, N. C. & Hemlay, D. W. 1963. An investigation of the feeding habits of two species of sea stars. Bull. mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb., Vol. 13, pp. 354–9.Google Scholar
Hunt, O. D. 1925. The food of the bottom fauna of the Plymouth fishing grounds. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 13, pp. 560–99.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. H. 1955. Echinodermata, the Coelemate Bilatera. The Invertebrates, Vol. IV, 763 pp. New York.Google Scholar
Hynes, H. B. N. 1950. The food of fresh-water sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius), with a review of methods used in studies of the food of fishes. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 19, pp. 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, N. S. 1940. The distribution of the marine fauna and bottom deposits off Port Erin. Proc. Trans. Lpool biol. Soc., Vol. 53, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Koehler, R. 1914. Echinoderma I: Asteroidea, Ophiuroidea at Echinoidea. Beitr. Kennt. Meeresfauna Westafr., Bd. 1, pp. 127–304.Google Scholar
Mauzey, K. P.Birkeland, C. & Dayton, P. K. 1968. Feeding behaviour of asteroids and escape responses to their prey in the Puget Sound Region. Ecology, Vol. 49, pp. 603–19.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T. 1927. Handbook of the Echinoderms of the British Isles. 471 pp. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swynnerton, G. H. & Worthington, E. B. 1940. Note on the food of fish in Haweswater (Westmorland). J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 9, pp. 183–7.Google Scholar