Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:35:10.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First assessment of biomass and abundance of cephalopods Rossia palpebrosa and Gonatus fabricii in the Barents Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2016

Alexey V. Golikov ,
Rushan M. Sabirov  and
Pavel A. Lubin
Alexey V. Golikov*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia
Rushan M. Sabirov
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia
Pavel A. Lubin
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Coastal Research, Polar Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography, 183038 Murmansk, Russia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A.V. Golikov, Department of Zoology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies on the quantitative distribution of cephalopods in the Arctic are limited, and almost completely absent for the Barents Sea. It is known that the most abundant cephalopods in the Arctic are Rossia palpebrosa and Gonatus fabricii. Their biomass and abundance have been assessed for the first time in the Barents Sea and adjacent waters. The maximum biomass of R. palpebrosa in the Barents Sea was 6.216–6.454 thousand tonnes with an abundance of 521.5 million specimens. Increased densities of biomass were annually registered in the north-eastern parts of the Barents Sea. The maximum biomass of G. fabricii in the Barents Sea was 24.797 thousand tonnes with an abundance of 1.705 billion specimens. The areas with increased density of biomass (higher than 100 kg km−2) and abundance (more than 10,000 specimens km−2) were concentrated in deep-water troughs in the marginal parts of the Barents Sea and in adjacent deep-water areas. The biomass and abundance of R. palpebrosa and G. fabricii in the Barents Sea were much lower than those of major taxa of invertebrates and fish and than those of cephalopods in other parts of the World Ocean. It has been suggested that the importance of cephalopods in the Arctic ecosystems, at least in terms of quantitative distribution, could be somewhat lower than in the Antarctic or the tropics. Despite the impact of ongoing warming of the Arctic on the distribution of cephalopods being described repeatedly already, no impact of the current year's climate on the studied species was found. The only exception was the abundance of R. palpebrosa, which correlated with the current year's climate conditions.

Keywords

Biomass assessmentabundance assessmentCephalopodaRossia palpebrosaGonatus fabriciiBarents Sea
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 97 , Issue 8 , December 2017 , pp. 1605 - 1616
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

3

Present address: Laboratory of Hydrobiology, Institute of Ecology and Subsurface Exploration Problems of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia

References

REFERENCES

Arkhipkin, A.I. (1995) Statolith microstructure and maximum age of the sepiolid Rossia pacifica (Cephalopoda, Sepioidea) in the northern part of the North Pacific. Sarsia 80, 237–240.Google Scholar
Arkhipkin, A.I. and Bjørke, H. (2000) Statolith shape and microstructure as indicators of ontogenetic shifts in the squid Gonatus fabricii (Oegopsida, Gonatidae) from the Norwegian Sea. Polar Biology 23, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkhipkin, A.I., Rodhouse, P.G.K., Pierce, G.J., Sauer, W., Sakai, M., Allcock, L., Arguelles, J., Bower, J.R., Castillo, G., Ceriola, L., Chen, C.-S., Chen, X., Diaz-Santana, M., Downeye, N., Gonzãlez, A.F., Amores, J.G., Green, C.P., Guerra, A., Hendrickson, L.C., Ibanez, Ch., Ito, K., Jereb, P., Kato, Y., Katugin, O.N., Kawano, M., Kidokoro, H., Kulik, V.V., Laptikhovsky, V.V., Lipinski, M.R., Liu, B., Mariategui, L., Marin, W., Medina, A., Miki, K., Miyahara, K., Moltschaniwskyj, N., Moustahfid, H., Nabhitabhata, J., Nanjo, N., Nigmatullin, Ch.M., Ohtani, T., Pecl, G., Perez, J.A.A., Piatkowski, U., Saikliang, P., Salinas-Zavala, C.A., Steer, M., Tian, Y., Ueta, Y., Vijai, D., Wakabayashi, T., Yamaguchi, T., Yamashiro, C., Yamashita, N. and Zeidberg, L.D. (2015) World squid fisheries. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture 23, 92–252.Google Scholar
Baranov, F.I. (1918) On the question of the biological basis of fisheries. Izvestya Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Ikthiologicheskogo Instituta 1, 81–128. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Bjørke, H. (1995) Norwegian investigations on Gonatus fabricii . International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM Papers and Reports) , CM 1995/K:12, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Bjørke, H. (2001) Predators of the squid Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein) in the Norwegian Sea. Fisheries Research 52, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørke, H. and Gjøsaeter, H. (1998) Who eats the larger Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein) in the Norwegian Sea? International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM Papers and Reports), CM 1998/M:10, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Blanchard, J.L., Pinnegar, J.K. and Mackinson, S. (2002) Exploring marine mammal-fishery interactions using ‘Ecopath with Ecosim’: modelling the Barents Sea ecosystem. Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science Series Technical Report 117, 52 pp.Google Scholar
Boitsov, V.D., Karsakov, A.L. and Trofimov, A.G. (2012) Atlantic water temperature and climate in the Barents Sea, 2000–2009. ICES Journal of Marine Science 69, 833–840.Google Scholar
Boyle, P.R. and Rodhouse, P.G. (2005) Cephalopods: ecology and fisheries. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Collins, M.A. and Rodhouse, P.G.K. (2006) Southern ocean cephalopods. Advances in Marine Biology 50, 191–265.Google Scholar
Collins, M.A., Yau, C., Allcock, L. and Thuston, M.H. (2001) Distribution of deep-water benthic and bentho-pelagic cephalopods from the north-east Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 105–117.Google Scholar
Cressie, N. (1990) The origins of kriging. Mathematical Geology 22, 239–252.Google Scholar
Dalpadado, P., Arrigo, K.R., Hjøllo, S.S., Rey, F., Ingvaldsen, R.B., Sperfeld, E., van Dijken, G.L., Stige, L.C., Olsen, A. and Ottersen, G. (2014) Productivity in the Barents Sea – response to recent climate variability. PLoS ONE 9, e95273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095273.Google Scholar
Dalpadado, P., Ellertsen, B., Melle, W. and Skjøldal, H.L. (1998) Summer distribution patterns and biomass estimates of macrozooplankton and micronekton in the Nordic Seas. Sarsia 83 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dommasnes, A., Christensen, V., Ellertsen, B., Kvamme, C., Melle, W., Nøttestad, L., Pedersen, T., Tjelmeland, S. and Zeller, D. (2001) An Ecopath model for the Norwegian Sea and Barents Sea. In Guenette, S., Christensen, V. and Pauly, D. (eds) Fisheries impacts on North Atlantic ecosystems: models and analyses. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 9 (4). Vancouver: University of British Columbia, pp. 213–240.Google Scholar
Eriksen, E., Bogstad, B. and Nakken, O. (2011) Ecological significance of 0-group fish in the Barents Sea ecosystem. Polar Biology 34, 647–657.Google Scholar
Eriksen, E., Durif, C.M.F. and Prozorkevich, D. (2014) Lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) in the Barents Sea: development of biomass and abundance indices, and spatial distribution. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu05969.Google Scholar
Eriksen, E., Prozorkevich, D., Trofimov, A. and Howell, D. (2012) Biomass of scyphozoan jellyfish, and its spatial association with 0-group fish in the Barents Sea. PLoS ONE 7, e33050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033050.Google Scholar
Frandsen, R.P. and Wieland, K. (2004) Cephalopods in Greenland waters. Pinngortitaleriffik, Greenland Institute of Natural Resources. Technical report 57, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Gardiner, K. and Dick, T.A. (2010) Arctic cephalopod distributions and their associated predators. Polar Research 29, 209–227.Google Scholar
Golikov, A.V., Morov, A.R., Sabirov, R.M., Lubin, P.A. and Jørgensen, L.L. (2013a) Functional morphology of reproductive system of Rossia palpebrosa (Cephalopoda, Sepiolida) in the Barents Sea. Proceedings of Kazan University, Natural Sciences series 155, 116–129. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Golikov, A.V., Sabirov, R.M. and Lubin, P.A. (2012) New data on Gonatus fabricii (Cephalopoda, Teuthida) distribution and reproductive biology in the Western Sector of Russian Arctic. Proceedings of Kazan University, Natural Sciences Series 154, 118–128. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Golikov, A.V., Sabirov, R.M., Lubin, P.A. and Jørgensen, L.L. (2013b) Changes in distribution and range structure of Arctic cephalopods due to climatic changes of the last decades. Biodiversity 14, 28–35.Google Scholar
Golikov, A.V., Sabirov, R.M., Lubin, P.A., Jørgensen, L.L. and Beck, I.-M. (2014) The northernmost record of Sepietta oweniana (Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae) and comments on boreo-subtropical cephalopod species occurrence in the Arctic. Marine Biodiversity Records 7, e58. doi: 10.1017/S1755267214000645.Google Scholar
Gulland, J.A. (1964) Manual of methods for fish population analysis. Food and Agriculture Organization Fisheries. Technical paper 40, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Hammer, O. and Harper, D.A.T. (2006) Paleontological data analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, T. and Ozhigin, V. (eds) (2012) The Barents Sea: ecosystem, resources, management. Half a century of Russian–Norwegian cooperation. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jereb, P., Roper, C.F.E. and Vecchione, M. (2010) Introduction. In Jereb, P. and Roper, C.F.E. (eds) Food and Agriculture Organization species catalogue for fishery purposes, No. 4: Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species known to date. Volume 2. Myopsid and oegopsid squids. Rome: FAO, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Johannesen, E., Lindstrom, U., Michalsen, K., Skern-Mauritzen, M., Fauchald, P., Bogstad, B. and Dolgov, A. (2012) Feeding in a heterogeneous environment: spatial dynamics in summer foraging Barents Sea cod. Marine Ecology Progress Series 458, 181–197.Google Scholar
Kristensen, T. (1977) Hatching, growth and distribution of juvenile Gonatus fabricii (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in Greenland waters. Astarte 10, 21–28.Google Scholar
Kristensen, T. (1984) Biology of Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein, 1818) from West Greenland waters. Meddelelser om Grønland. Bioscience 13, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkaditou, E. and Kaspiris, P. (2005) Distribution and abundance of sepiolids (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) off the north-eastern Greek coasts. Belgian Journal of Zoology 135, 199–204.Google Scholar
Lefkaditou, E., Maiorano, P. and Mytilineou, Ch. (2001) Cephalopod species captured by deep-water exploratory trawling in the Eastern Ionian Sea. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization scientific research document, No. 01/131, 9 pp.Google Scholar
Levin, V.S. (1994) Fisheries biology of marine bottom invertebrates and algae. St. Petersburg: OU-92. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Lipinski, M.R. and Underhill, L.G. (1995) Sexual maturation in squid: quantum or continuum? South African Journal of Marine Science 15, 207–223.Google Scholar
Lubin, P.A. (2006) Relative catchability and relative selectivity of bottom trawl gears to Pandalus borealis . In Sokolov, V.I. and Alekseev, D.O. (eds) Abstracts of VII All-Russian scientific conference on commercial invertebrates. Moscow: VNIRO Publishing, pp. 165–168. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Lubin, P.A. (2010) Catchability and selectivity of bottom grab gear and bottom trawl gear in relation to zoobenthos. In Matishov, G.G. (ed.) Nature of marine Arctic: modern challenges and role of science. Apatity: Kola Scientific Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences, pp. 134–135. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Lubin, P.A. and Sabirov, R.M. (2007) Fauna of cephalopods (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) of Spitsbergen Archipelago. In Matishov, G.G. (ed.) Proceedings of VII International scientific conference ‘Complex studies of Spitsbergen Archipelago’. Apatity: Kola Scientific Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences, pp. 300–306. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Matishov, G., Moiseev, D., Lyubina, O., Zhichkin, A., Dzhenyuk, S., Karamushko, O.and Frolova, E. (2012) Climate and cyclic hydrobiological changes of the Barents Sea from the twentieth to twenty-first centuries. Polar Biology 35, 1773–1790.Google Scholar
McCallum, B.R. and Walsh, S.J. (1997) Groundfish survey trawls used at the northwest Atlantic fisheries centre, 1971 to present. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization scientific council studies, No. 29, pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
Nesis, K.N. (1965) Distribution and feeding of juvenile squid Gonatus fabricii (Licht.) in the Labrador and Norwegian Seas. Oceanology V , 134–141. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Nesis, K.N. (1987) Cephalopods of the World: squid, cuttlefish, octopuses and their allies. Neptune City, NJ: T.F.H. Publications.Google Scholar
Nesis, K.N. (2001) West-Arctic and East-Arctic distributional ranges of cephalopods. Sarsia 86, 1–11.Google Scholar
Nigmatullin, Ch.M., Sabirov, R.M. and Zalygalin, V.P. (2003) Ontogenetic aspects of morphology, size, structure and production of spermatophores in ommastrephid squids: an overview. Berliner Paläobiologische Abhandlungen 3, 225–240.Google Scholar
Piatkowski, U and Wieland, K. (1993) The boreoatlantic gonate squid Gonatus fabricii: distribution and size off West Greenland in summer 1989 and in summer and autumn 1990. Aquatic Living Resources 6, 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, G.J. and Guerra, A. (1994) Stock assessment methods used for cephalopod fisheries. Fisheries Research 21, 255–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, C.F.E., Jorgensen, E., Katugin, O.N. and Jereb, P. (2010) Family Gonatidae. In Jereb, P. and Roper, C.F.E. (eds) Food and agriculture organization species catalogue for fishery purposes, № 4: Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species known to date, Volume 2. Myopsid and oegopsid squids. Rome: FAO, pp. 200–222.Google Scholar
Sabirov, R.M., Golikov, A.V., Nigmatullin, Ch.M. and Lubin, P.A. (2012) Structure of the reproductive system and hectocotylus in males of lesser flying squid Todaropsis eblanae (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae). Journal of Natural History 46, 1761–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabirov, R.M., Lubin, P.A. and Golikov, A.V. (2009) Finding of the lesser flying squid Todaropsis eblanae (Oegopsida, Ommastrephidae) from the Barents Sea. Zoologicheskiy zhurnal 88, 1010–1012. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Sakshaug, E., Johnsen, G. and Kovacs, K. (eds) (2009) Ecosystem. Barents Sea. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sennikov, A.M., Muchin, S.G. and Bliznichenko, T.E. (1989) Distribution and trophic importance of juvenile squid (Gonatus fabricii Lichtenstein) in the Norwegian and Barents Seas in 1986–1988. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM Papers and Reports), CM 1989/K:15, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Shuntov, V.P. and Bocharov, L.N. (eds) (2003) Nekton of the Okhotsk Sea. Abundance, biomass and species ratio. Vladivostok: TINRO-Centre.Google Scholar
Treble, M.A. (2007) Analysis of data from the 2006 trawl surveys in NAFO division 0A. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Scientific Council research document, No. 07/41, 25 pp.Google Scholar
Treshnikov, A.F. (ed.) (1985) Atlas of the Arctic. Moscow: Main Department of Geodesy and Cartography of the Council of Ministers USSR. [In Russian]Google Scholar
von Boletzky, S. and von Boletzky, M.V. (1973) Observations on the embryonic and early post-embryonic development of Rossia macrosoma (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 25, 135–161.Google Scholar
Walsh, S.J. (1996) Efficiency of bottom sampling trawls in deriving survey abundance indices. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Scientific Council Studies, No. 28, pp. 9–24.Google Scholar
Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmessan, C., Beebee, T.J.C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. and Bairlein, F. (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389–395.Google Scholar
Wassmann, P., Reigstad, M., Haug, T., Rudels, B., Carroll, M.L., Hop, H., Gabrielsen, G.W., Falk-Petersen, F., Denisenko, S.G., Arashkevich, E., Slagstad, D. and Pavlova, O. (2006) Food webs and carbon flux in the Barents Sea. Progress in Oceanography 71, 232–287.Google Scholar
Wiborg, K.F. (1979) Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein), a possible fishery resource in the Norwegian Sea. Fisken og Havet 1, 33–46. [In Norwegian]Google Scholar
Wiborg, K.F. (1980) Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein). Investigations in the Norwegian Sea and the western Barents Sea, June–September 1979. Fisken og Havet 1, 1–7. [In Norwegian]Google Scholar
Wiborg, K.F. (1982) Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein). Investigations in the Norwegian Sea and the western Barents Sea, February–September 1980 and July–September 1981. Fisken og Havet 2, 13–25. [In Norwegian]Google Scholar
Wiborg, K.F., Gjøsaeter, J. and Beck, I.-M. (1982) The squid Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein) investigations in the Norwegian Sea and western Barents Sea 1978–1981. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM Papers and Reports), CM 1982/K:31, 18 pp. K. F. Wiborg // Fisken og Havet. – Nr. 2, 1982. – P. 13–25. [In Norwegian]Google Scholar
Wiborg, K.F., Gjøsaeter, J. and Beck, I.-M. (1984) Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein). Investigations in the Norwegian and western Barents Seas, June–September 1982 and 1983. Fisken og Havet 2, 1–11. [In Norwegian]Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (2010) Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar