Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:03:40.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feeding and digestion in terebellid polychaetes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. Phillips Dales
R. Phillips Dales
Affiliation:
Sir John Cass College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most of the naturalists of the nineteenth century were attracted by the tube-building abilities of the terebellid polychaetes rather than by their feeding behaviour. As Dalyell (1853) says in his Powers of the Creator, referring to terebellids: ‘All are architects, nor of contemptible skill, as we shall find on contemplating their mechanical labours.’ Perhaps the best known English work dealing with this subject is the paper by Arnold Watson (1890) on the tube-building habits of the sand mason (Lattice conchilega), and while concerned mainly with tube building, the paper does include some observations on the feeding habits. Earlier, Gosse (1854) had recorded his observations on the behaviour of terebellids, and some additional information may be found in Quatrefages's Treatise of 1865. The first serious attempt to find out more about the morphology and histology of the gut in terebellids was made by Claparède (1873), and this work was published posthumously in his monograph on the Polychaeta Sedentaria.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 1955 , pp. 55 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, J. R., 1942. The free border of the intestinal epithelial cell of vertebrates. Quart. J. micr. Set., Vol. 84, pp. 73–103.Google Scholar
Brasil, L., 1904. Contribution à la connaissance de l'appareil digestif des Annélides Polychètes. Arch. Zool. exp. gen., Ser. 4, T. 2, pp. 91–255.Google Scholar
Claparède, É., 1873. Recherches sur la structure des Annélides Sédentaires. 199 pp. Geneva: Georg.Google Scholar
Dalyell, J. G., 1853. The Powers of the Creator Displayed in the Creation, Vol. 2. 327 pp. London: John van Voorst.Google Scholar
Elrington, G. A., 1909. Some points in the structure of the larva of Lanice conchilega. Cellule, T. 25, pp. 103–12.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1897. Recherches sur les Ampharetiens. Bull. sci. Fr. Belg., T. 30, pp. 277–488.Google Scholar
Glick, D., 1949. Techniques of Histo- and Cytochemistry. 531 pp. New York: Interscience.Google Scholar
Gosse, P. H., 1854. The Aquarium: an Unveiling of the Wonders of the Deep Sea 278 pp. London: John van Voorst.Google Scholar
Hanson, J., 1948. Transport of food through the alimentary canals of aquatic annelids. Quart. J. micr. Set., Vol. 89, pp. 47–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Hessle, C., 1917. Zur Kenntnis der terebellomorphen Polychaeten. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, Bd. 5, pp. 39–258.Google Scholar
Hessle, C., 1925. Bidrag tell kännedomen om de terebellomorfa polychaeternas biologi. Ark. Zool., Bd. 17A, No. 9, 29 pp.Google Scholar
Jägersten, G., 1947. On the structure of the pharynx of the Archiannelida with special reference to the there-occurring muscle cells of aberrant type. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, Bd. 25, pp. 551–70.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W. C., 1922. A Monograph of the British Marine Annelids Vol. 4, Part 1, 250 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Meyer, E., 1887. Studien über den Körperbau der Anneliden. Mitt. zool. Sta. Neapel, Bd. 7, pp. 592–741.Google Scholar
Newell, G. E., & Baxter, E. W., 1936. On the nature of the free cell-border of certain mid-gut epithelia. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 79, pp. 123–50.Google Scholar
Nicol, E. A. T., 1931. The feeding mechanism, formation of the tube, and physiology of digestion in Sabella pavonina. Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 56, pp. 537–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, D., 1912. Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Nervensystems der Polychaeten. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, Bd. 1, pp. 85–161.Google Scholar
Quatrefages, M. A. De, 1865. Histoire naturelle des Annelés Marins et d'eau Douce. T. 1, 588 pp. Paris: Roret.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, A. G., 1951. The Integument of Arthropods. 411 pp. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Salensky, W., 1883. Études sur le développement des Annélides. Part 1 (5), Terebella meckelii. Arch. Biol., Paris, T. 4, pp. 221–64.Google Scholar
Steen, J., 1883. Anatomisch-Histologische Untersuchung von Terebellides stroemi M. Sars. Jena. Z. Naturw., Bd. 16, pp. 201–46.Google Scholar
Stephenson, J., 1913. On intestinal respiration in annelids; with considerations on the origin and evolution of the vascular system in that group. Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 49, pp. 735–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. G., 1940. Pomatoceros, Sabella and Amphitrite. L.M.B.C. Mem., No. 33, 88 pp. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the sound (Øresund). Medd. Komm. Havundersag., Kbh., Ser. Plankton, Bd. 4, No. 1,523 pp.Google Scholar
Ullman, A., & Bookhout, C. G., 1949. The histology of the digestive tract of Clymenella torquata (Leidy). J. Morph., Vol. 84, pp. 31–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, A. T., 1890. The tube-building habits of Terebella littoralis. J. R. micr. Soc, 1890, pp. 685–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. P., 1949. The behaviour of Arenicola marina L. in sand, and the rô1e of spontaneous activity cycles. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 465–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. P. & Dales, R. P., 1951. Spontaneous activity patterns in animal behaviour: the irrigation of the burrow in the polychaetes Chaetopterus variopedatus Renier and Nereis diversicolor O. F. Müller. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 661–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, J. H., 1934. The structure and reactions of the tentacles of Terebellamagnifica W. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 66, pp. 339–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1928. The post-larval development of Loimia medusa Sav. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 15, pp. 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiren, A., 1885. Om cirkulations- och digestions-organen hos annelidr af familjerna Ampharetidae, Terebellidae och Amphictenidae. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., Bd. 21, No. 7, 58 pp.Google Scholar