Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:08:26.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Evidence for Aggregation of Salmon Louse Copepodids (Lepeophtheirus Salmonis) in Step Salinity Gradients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Peter Andreas Heuch
Peter Andreas Heuch
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Section of Marine Zoology and Marine Chemistry, University of Oslo, PO Box 1064 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis Krayer (Copepoda: Caligida), the salmon louse, is a parasite of salmonids. The vertical distribution of the infective stage, the copepodid, was studied in salinity gradients with one step increase of 15‰ (154%e> on top of 304‰), 5‰ (25–4‰ on top of 30–4‰) and 2%> (28–4‰ on top of 304‰) in 1-m perspex columns. Copepodid distribution in a linear gradient, where the salinity increased from 154‰ at 0 cm depth to 304‰ at 87–5 cm, was also recorded. Homogeneous 304‰ salinity columns served as the control. In these, the animals gathered in the top section of the water column in response to 1 h of light from above, and spread downwards in response to 4 h of darkness. In columns with a 15‰ step increase in salinity with depth, copepodids aggregated just underneath the discontinuity irrespective of light conditions. In step salinity gradients of 5‰ and 2‰ S, under both light regimes, animals were significantly more numerous in the step sections compared with the control. In the linear gradient, significant numbers of copepodids accumulated at approximately 20‰ salinity when subjected to 1 h of light. In the dark, there were no significant aggregations. Copepodids were found in 15–17–2‰ salinity in all linear gradient experiments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , November 1995 , pp. 927 - 939
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon, , 1992. Report of the Sea Trout Working Group. Fisheries Research Centre, Department of the Marine, Abbotstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.Google Scholar
Anon, , 1993. Report of the Sea Trout Working Group. Fisheries Research Centre, Department of the Marine, Abbotstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.Google Scholar
Birkeland, K., 1993. Omfang og konsekvenser av lakselusinfeksjoner på sjøørreten i Lønningdalselven. Report. Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, Norway. Department of Ecology, Zoological Museum, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Brandal, P.O., Egidius, E. & Romslo, I., 1976. Host blood: a major food component for the parasitic copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis Krøyeri, 1838 (Crustacea: Caligidae). Norwegian Journal of Zoology, 24, 341–343.Google Scholar
Combes, C., 1991. Evolution of Parasite Life Cycles. In Parasite-host associations. Coexistence or conflict? (ed. C.A., Toft et al.), pp. 63–82. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Costello, M.J., 1993. Review of methods to control sea lice (Caligidae: Crustacea) infestations on salmon (Salmo salar) farms. In Pathogens of wild and farmed fish: sea lice (ed. G.A., Boxshall and D., Defaye), pp. 219–252. Chichester: Ellis & Horwood Ltd.Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, P. & Loose, C.J., 1992. Metabolic costs during predator-induced diel vertical migration of Daphnia. Limnology and Oceanography, 37, 1589–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Døving, K.B., 1989. Salmon orientation by olfactory cues. In Tenth International Symposium on olfaction and taste, Oslo, Norway (ed. K.B., Doving), pp. 55–65. Oslo, Norway: GCS a.s.Google Scholar
Døving, K.B., Westerberg, H. & Johnsen, P.B., 1985. Role of olfaction in the behavioral and neuronal responses of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, to hydrographic stratification. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42, 1658–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forward, R.B. Jr, 1987. Crustacean larval migration: a perspective. In Signposts in the sea. Proceedings of a multidisciplinary workshop on marine animal orientation and migration (ed. W.F., Herrnkind), pp. 29–44. Tallahassee: Department of Biological Science, Florida State University.Google Scholar
Grindley, J.R., 1964. Effect of low-salinity water on the vertical migration of estuarine plankton. Nature, London, 203, 781–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hara, T.J., 1993. Role of olfaction in fish behaviour. In Behaviour of teleost fishes (ed. T.J., Pitcher), pp. 171–199. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, W., 1968. Reactions of plankton organisms to water stratification. Limnology and Oceanography, 13, 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuch, P.A., Parsons, A. & Boxaspen, K., in press. Diel vertical migration - a possible host-finding mechanism in salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) copepodids?Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.Google Scholar
Hislop, J.R.G. & Shelton, R.G.J., 1993. Marine predators and prey of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). In Salmon in the sea and new enhancement strategies (ed. D., Mills), pp. 104—118. Oxford: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
Johnson, S.C. & Albright, L.J., 1991. Development, growth, and survival of Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Copepoda: Caligidae) under laboratory conditions. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 425–436.Google Scholar
Jones, K.A., 1992. Food search behaviour in fish and the use of chemical lures in commercial and sports fishing. In Fish chemoreception (ed. T.J., Hara), pp. 288–320. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jónsdóttir, H., Bron, J.E., Wootten, R. & Turnbull, J.F., 1992. The histopathology associated with the pre-adult and adult stages of Lepeophtheirus salmonis on the Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Journal of Fish Diseases, 15, 521–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lance, J., 1962. Effects of water of reduced salinity on the vertical migration of zooplankton. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 42, 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latz, M.I. & Forward, R.B. Jr, 1977. The effect of salinity upon phototaxis and geotaxis in a larval crustacean. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 153, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, N.S. & Riple, T.H., 1989. Metomidate, a better anesthetic for cod (Gadus morhua) in comparison with benzocaine, MS-222, chlorobutanol and phenoxyethanol. Aquaculture, 83, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, J.R., Idler, D.R., Jonas, R.E.E. & Tomlinson, N., 1962. Olfactory perception in juvenile salmon. I. Observations on response of juvenile sockeye to extracts of foods. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 19, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, N.J. & Epifanio, C.E., 1985. The effect of salinity on the dispersal and recruitment of fiddler crab larvae. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 5, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsén, K.H., Karlsson, L. & Helander, A., 1986. Food search behaviour in Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus (L.), induced by food extracts and amino acids. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 12, 1987–1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, A. W., 1989. Sea lice – major pathogens of farmed Atlantic salmon. Parasitology Today, 5, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, M.H. Jr, 1971. Larval development of Pagurus longicarpus Say reared in the laboratory. III. Behavioral responses to salinity discontinuities. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Labora-tory, Woods Hole, 140, 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, G.D. & Roberts, L.S., 1985. Foundations of parasitology. St Louis: Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing.Google Scholar
Steele, J.H., 1978. Some comments on plankton patches. In Spatial pattern in plankton communities (ed. J.H., Steele), pp. 1–17. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulkin, S.D. & Heukelem, W. van, 1982. Larval recruitment in the crab Callinectes sapidus Rathbun: an amendment to the concept of larval retention in estuaries. In Estuarine comparisons (ed. V.S., Kennedy), pp. 459–475. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, O. & Whelan, K.F., 1993. Production of nauplii of Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer) (Cope-poda: Caligidae) from farmed and wild salmon and its relation to the infestation of wild sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) off the west coast of Ireland in 1991. Fisheries Research, 17, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urdal, K., 1992. Omfanget av lakselus pa vill laksefisk ifylka Nordland, Nord- og Sor-Trondelag, More og Romsdal og Sogn og Fjordane. Report. Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, Norway. Zoological Museum, Department of Ecology, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Westerberg, H., 1982. Ultrasonic tracking of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) II. Swimming depth and temperature stratification. Report. Institute of Freshwater Research, Drottningholm, 60, 102–120.Google Scholar
Westerberg, H., 1989. Properties of aquatic odour trails. In Tenth International Symposium on olfaction and taste, Oslo, Norway (ed. K.B., Døving), pp. 45–54. Oslo, Norway: GCS a.s.Google Scholar