Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:07:40.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Epifauna of the Northern North Sea (56°–61°N)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D.J. Basford ,
A. Eleftheriou  and
D. Raffaelli
D.J. Basford
Affiliation:
Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Torry, Aberdeen, AB9 8DB
A. Eleftheriou
Affiliation:
Culterty Field Station, University of Aberdeen, Newburgh, Ellon, Aberdeenshire, AB4 OAA
D. Raffaelli
Affiliation:
Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Torry, Aberdeen, AB9 8DB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

More than 65% of the demersal fish and shellfish caught by British vessels are landed at Scottish ports, most of the catch being taken from waters north of 56°, i.e. in the northern North Sea. The major resource supporting these fisheries is the benthos, but the distributions of both infaunal and epifaunal benthic invertebrates in the North Sea are poorly documented. Moreover, the environmental factors determining the composition and structure of North Sea benthic assemblages are not well understood. There have been several limited surveys of the benthos (Stephen, 1934; Ursin, 1960), and recently Dyer et al. (1982, 1983), Cranmer (1985) and Cranmer et al. (1984) attempted a more quantitative and systematic survey. Various schemes have been proposed to explain observed regional differences in types of benthic assemblage, usually based on the biological characteristics of water masses, and / or a limited and fragmentary knowledge of the sediments of the North Sea {e.g. Glemarec, 1973; Dyer et al, 1983).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , May 1989 , pp. 387 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, J.A., 1987. The primary ecological sub-divisions of the North Sea: some aspects of their plankton communities. In Developments in Fisheries Research in Scotland (ed. R.S., Bailey and B.B., Parrish), pp. 165–181. London: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
Adema, J.P.H.M., Creutzberg, F. & Noort, G.T., 1982. Notes on the occurrence of some poorly known Decapoda (Crustacea) in the southern North Sea. Zoologische Bijdragen (Leiden), 28, 9–32.Google Scholar
Basford, D.J. & Eleftheriou, A., 1988. The benthic environment of the North Sea (56°–61°N). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 68, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V.N.D., 1979. The Quaternary sediments of the North Sea. In The North-West European Shelf Seas: The Sea Bed and the Sea in Motion. I. Geology and Sedimentology (ed. F.T., Banneret al), pp. 195–270. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M.E., 1969. Crustacea. Decapoda. Brachyura. Marine Invertebrates of Scandinavia, no. 2, 143 pp.Google Scholar
Cranmer, G.J., 1985. Recent investigations into the distribution of regular echinoids in the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranmer, G.J., Fry, P.D. & Dyer, M.F., 1984. Further results from headline camera surveys in the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, F.M., 1923. Quantitative studies on the fauna of the sea bottom. No. 1. Preliminary investigation of the Dogger Bank. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ser. 2), 6(2), 54 pp.Google Scholar
Davis, F.M., 1925. Quantitative studies on the fauna of the sea bottom. No. 2. Results of the investigations in the southern North Sea, 1921–24. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ser. 2), 8(4), 50 pp.Google Scholar
Dyer, M.F., Fry, W.G., Fry, P.D. & Cranmer, G.J., 1982. A series of North Sea benthos surveys with trawl and headline camera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 62, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, M.F., Fry, W.G., Fry, P.D. & Cranmer, G.J., 1983. Benthic regions within the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 683–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eleftheriou, A. & Basford, D.J., 1989. The macrobenthic infauna of the offshore northern North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 69, 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauch, H.G., 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glémarec, M., 1973. The benthic communities of the European North Atlantic shelf. Oceanography and Marine Biology, an Annual Review, 11, 263–289.Google Scholar
Ingle, R.W., 1980. British Crabs. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Lee, A.J., 1980. North Sea: physical oceanography. In The North-West European Shelf Seas: The Sea Bed and the Sea in Motion. II. Physical and Chemical Oceanography, and Physical Resources (ed. F.T., Banneret al), pp. 467–493. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
McKay, D.W. & Smith, S.M., 1979. Marine Mollusca of East Scotland. Edinburgh: Royal Scottish Museum.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T., 1927. Handbook of the Echinoderms of the British Isles. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selbie, C.M., 1921. The Decapoda Reptantia of the coasts of Ireland. Part 2. Paguridae. Scientific Investigations of the Fisheries Branch. Department of Agriculture and Technical Instruction for Ireland for 1921, no. 1, 68 pp.Google Scholar
Smaldon, G., 1979. British coastal shrimps and prawns. Synopses of the British Fauna, no. 15, 126 pp.Google Scholar
Stephen, A.C., 1933. Studies on the Scottish marine fauna: the natural faunistic divisions of the North Sea as shown by the quantitative distribution of the molluscs. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 57, part III, no. 22, 601–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A.C., 1934. Studies on the Scottish marine fauna: quantitative distribution of the echinoderms and the natural faunistic divisions of the North Sea. Transactiotis of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 57, part III, no. 32, 777–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Süssbach, S. & Breckner, A., 1911. Die Seeigel, Seesterne und Schlangensterne der Nord – und Ostsee. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen Herausgegeben von der Kommission zur Wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der Deutschen Meere in Kiel und der Biologischen Anstalt auf Helgoland (Abteilung Kiel), 12, 167–302.Google Scholar
Ursin, E., 1960. A quantitative investigation of the echinoderm fauna of the central North Sea. Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havundersøgelser, 2(24), 204 pp.Google Scholar
Wigley, R.L. & Emery, K.O., 1967. Benthic animals, particularly Hyalinoecia (Annelida) and Ophiomusium (Echinodermata), in sea bottom photographs from the continental slope. In Deep Sea Photography (ed. J.B., Hersey), pp. 235–249. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins Press. [The Johns Hopkins Oceanographic Studies, no. 3. ]Google Scholar
Wintzell, J., 1918. Bidrag till de Skandinaviska Ophiuridernas biologi och fysiologi. Uppsala University Doctoral Dissertation. Uppsala: Akademsk Abhandling, 161 pp.Google Scholar