Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:56:00.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eggs of the Microchirus species (Soleidae) from the Bay of Algiers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. Y. Marinaro
J. Y. Marinaro
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, Université de Perpignan, 66025 Perpignan, Cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Soleid eggs caught in the plankton off Algiers were reared and identified. Thus, the egg and the yolk sac stages of Microchirus ocellatus (L.) and M. azevia (Capello) were described, compared and differentiated from the corresponding stages of M. variegatus (Donovan). For the latter species, a large perivitelline space was often discernible.

In 1889, Cunningham referred some pelagic eggs caught near Eddystone (English Channel) to Solea variegata, owing to their similarity to the mature ovarian eggs of this species. Moreover, he considered the embryonic and larval stages described, illustrated and named ’species no. 1'by Raffaele (1888) as belonging to the same soleid. In further works, Cunningham studied the two-day-old larva (1890) and the newly hatched larva (1896). These papers and some others relating to Microchirus variegatus (Donovan, 1808) (present name of S. variegata) were reviewed by Ehrenbaum (1905), Padoa (1956), Nichols (1976) and Russell (1976).

Such eggs are often collected in the plankton of the Bay of Algiers, but I noted a great variability in their features. According to Quero et al.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 117 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbault, S. & Boutin, N. 1968. Ichthyoplancton. Oeufs et larves de poissons téleostéens dans le golfe de Gascogne en 1964. Revue des Travaux de l'lnstitut Scientifique et Technique des Píches Maritimes, 32, 413–476.Google Scholar
Belaid, B. & Marinaro, J.Y. 1983. Biologie de la reproduction de Microchirus azevia (Capello) (Téléostéen soléidé). Rapports et Procès-verbaux des Réunions. Commission Internationale pour l'Exploration Scientifique de la Mer Méditerranée, 28, 59–60.Google Scholar
Cunningham, J.T. 1889. Studies of the reproduction and development of teleostean fishes occurring in the neighbourhood of Plymouth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 1, 10–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J.T. 1890. A Treatise on the Common Sole. Plymouth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J.T. 1896. The Natural History of the Marketable Marine Fishes of the British Islands. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Desoutter, M. 1987. Statut de Microchirus boscanion Chabanaud, 1926 et Buglossidium luteum (Risso, 1810) (Pisces, Pleuronectiformes, Soleidae). Cybium, 11, 427–439.Google Scholar
Ehrenbaum, E. 1905. Eier und Larven von Fischen. Nordisches Plankton, 1, 216 pp.Google Scholar
Hefford, A.E. 1910. Notes on teleostean ova and larvae observed at Plymouth in spring and summer, 1909. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 9, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, E.W.L. 1891. Survey of fishing grounds west coast of Ireland, 1890. On the eggs and larvae of teleosteans. Scientific Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society, 4, 435–1474.Google Scholar
Holt, E.W.L. 1899. Recherches sur la reproduction des poissons osseux. Principalement dans le Golfe de Marseille. Annales du Musee d'Histoire Naturelle de Marseille (Zoologie), 5(2), 128 pp.Google Scholar
Kyle, H.M. 1913. Flat fishes (Heterosomata). Report on the Danish Oceanogmphical Expeditions, 1908–1910, to the Mediterranean, 2(A1), 150 pp.Google Scholar
Lee, J.Y. 1966. Oeufs et larves planctoniques de poissons. Revue des Travaux de l'lnstitut Scientifique et Technique des Peches Maritimes, 30, 171–208.Google Scholar
Maigret, J. & Boubacar, L.Y. 1986. Les Poissons deMerdeMauritanie. Compiegne: Sciences Naturelles.Google Scholar
Marinaro, J.Y. 1971. Contribution à l'étude des oeufs et larves pélagiques de poissons méditerranéens. V. Oeufs pélagiques de la Baie d'Alger. Pelagos, 3(1), 118 pp.Google Scholar
Marinaro, J.Y.Grim, Z. & Sorbe, J.C. 1979. Rapport sur les soléidés d'Algérie. V. Aspects du cycle sexuel. Pelagos, 5(2), 65–77.Google Scholar
Nichols, J.H. 1976. Soleidae of the eastern north Atlantic. Fiches d'Identification du Zooplancton, no. 150/151, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Padoa, E. 1956. Heterosomata. Faunae Flora del Golfo di Napoli, 38, 783–877.Google Scholar
Palomera, M.I. & Rubiés, P. 1977. Description de huevos y larvas de Microchirus ocellatus y M. azevia (Pleuronectiformes - Soleidae) de las costas del NW de Africa. Investigatión Pesquera Supplement. (Resultados Expediciones Cientificas del Buque Oceanografico ‘Cornidede Saavedra’, no. 6), 211–220.Google Scholar
QuéroJ.C., J.C.,Desoutter, M. & Lagardère, F. 1986. Soleidae. In Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, vol. 3 (Ed. Whitehead, P.J.P.et al), pp. 1308–1324. Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
Raffaele, F. 1888. Le uova gallegianti e le larve dei Teleostei nel Golfo di Napoli. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Station zu Neapel, 8, 1–84.Google Scholar
Russell, F.S. 1976. The Eggs and Planktonic Stages of British Marine Fishes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thomopoulos, A. 1956. Sur quelques oeufs planctoniques de Teleosteens de la Baie de Villefranche. II. Píches du mois de Septembre. Bulletin de l'lnstitut Oceanographique de Monaco, no. 1072, 16 pp.Google Scholar