Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:26:54.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Eggs and Larvae of the British Prosobranchs with Special Reference to those Living in the Plankton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Marie V. Lebour
Marie V. Lebour
Affiliation:
Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Molluscs are very important members of our marine fauna, and, since many of them are planktonic in their early stages, they contribute largely to the number of organisms available as food for plankton-eating animals. The present work includes the prosobranchs only, particularlythose from Plymouth which have been specially studied during the last few years. Several papers have already been published dealing with the Plymouth species (Lebour, 1931–6), and these are referred to in due course. The present paper brings together the above work and that of others and summarizes our knowledge of the larval prosobranchs of Britain, with a description of the eggs. Naturally there are still many gaps, but it is hoped that these may be filled in time. A preliminary paper on the subject has already appeared (Lebour, 1933f). Closely related foreign species are referred to for comparison with our British forms. Original notes on certain species and information on the echinospira larva of Capulus ungaricus are given here for the first time. Figures of typical eggs and larvae are given.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , November 1937 , pp. 105 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, A., 1857. A new species of Macgillivrayia. Ann. Mag.Nat. Hist., Ser. 2, Vol. XIX, pp. 373–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, A., 1861. On a supposed new genus and on some new species of pelagic Mollusca. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 3, Vol. VIII, pp. 401–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ankel, W. E., 1929. Über die Bildung der Eikapsel bei Nassa-Arten. Zool. Anz. Supp. 4 (Verh. d. Deutsch. Gesellsch. E. V. auf der 33. Jahresversammlung zu Marburg), pp. 219–30.Google Scholar
Ankel, W. E., 1930. Nähreierbildung bei Natica catena (da Costa). Zool. Anz., Bd. 89, pp. 129–35.Google Scholar
Ankel, W. E., 1935a. Die Pantoffelschnecke, ein Schädling der Auster. Natur und Volk, Vol. 65, pp. 173–6.Google Scholar
Ankel, W. E., 1935b. Das Gelege von Lamellaria perspicua L. Zeitschr. Morphol. Ökologie Tiere, Bd. 30, Heft 4, pp. 635–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baster, J., 1762–1765. Naturkundige Uitspanningen. Te Haarlem byJ. Bosch.Google Scholar
Boas, J. E. V., 1886. Bidrag til Pteropodernes Morfologi og Systematik samt til Kundskaben om deres geografiske Udbredelse. Spolia Atlantica. Kgl. Dansk. Vid. Selsk. Skr. (6), Vol. IV, No. 1, 231 pp.Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, S., 1888. Notizie biologiche riguardante specialmente il periodo di maturità sessuale degli animali del golfo di Napoli. Mitt. Zool. Stat. Neapel, Vol. VIII, pp. 385–440.Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, S., 1899. Notizie biologiche riguardante specialmente il periodo di maturitàsessuale degli animali del golfo di Napoli. Mitt. Zool. Stat. Neapel, Vol. XIII, pp. 448–573.Google Scholar
Boutan, L., 1885. Recherches sur l'Anatomie et le Développement de la Fissurelle. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén., 2e Sér., T. III bis. Suppl., 4e Mém. pp. 1–173.Google Scholar
Boutan, L., 1898. Sur le développement de 1'Acmaea virginea. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, CXXVI, pp. 1887–9.Google Scholar
Boutan, L., 1899. La cause principale de l'asymétrie des mollusques gastéropodes. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén., 3e Sér., Vol. VII, pp. 203–342.Google Scholar
Caullery, M. & Pelseneer, P., 1910. Sur la ponte et le développement du Vignot (Littorina littorea). Bull. Sci. France Belgique, T. XLIV, pp. 357–60.Google Scholar
Conklin, E. G., 1891. Preliminary Note on the Embryology of Crepidula fornicata and of Urosalpinx cinerea. Johns Hopkins University Circulars, Vol. 10, No. 88, pp. 89–90.Google Scholar
Conklin, E. G., 1897. The embryology of Crepidula. A contribution to the cell lineage and early development of some marine gastropods. Journ. Morph., Vol. XIII, No. 1, pp. 1–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, A. H., 1895. Molluscs. In the Cambridge Natural History, III, pp. 1–459.Google Scholar
Crofts, D. R., 1929. Haliotis. L.M.B.C. Memoirs, XXIX, pp. 1–174.Google Scholar
Craven, A. E., 1877. Monographic du genre Sinusigera. Ann. Soc. Malac. Belgique, Vol. XII, p. 112.Google Scholar
Craven, A. E., 1883. On the Genus Sinusigera d'Orb. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 5, Vol. XI, pp. 141–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. R.Ainsworth, & Fleure, H. J., 1903. Patella. L.M.B.C. Memoirs, X, pp. 1–76.Google Scholar
Delsman, H. C., 1914. Entwicklungsgeschichte von Littorina obtusata. Tijdschr. Nederl. Dierkundige Vereeniging, Ser. 2, Deel 13, pp. 170–340.Google Scholar
Dons, C., 1913. Om eggloegningen hos enkelte Buccinider Zoologiske notiser. II. Tromsø Museums Aarshefter, 35–36.Google Scholar
Fischer, H., 1892. Recherches sur la Morphologie du Foie des Gastéropodes. Bull. Sci. France Belgique, XXIV (4), Vol. III, pp. 260–346.Google Scholar
Fischer, P., 1880–1887. Manuel de Conchyliologie.Google Scholar
Flattely, F. W. & Walton, C. L., 1922. The Biology of the Sea-Shore. Pp. 1–334. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friele, H., 1882. The Norwegian North-Atlantic Expedition, 1876–78. Mollusca, 1–2 (pt. 1, pp. 38; pt. 2, pp. 44).Google Scholar
Gersch, M., 1936. Der Genitalapparat und die Sexualbiologie der Nordseetxochiden. Zeitsch. Morph. Ökologie Tiere, Bd. 31, Heft 1, pp. 106–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giard, A., 1875. Sur l'Embryologie du Lamellaria perspicua. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, T. LXXX, pp. 736–9.Google Scholar
Giard, A., 1885–1886. Synopsis de la Faune Marine de la France Septentrionale (Suite I). Bull. Sci. Département du Nord, No. 5–6 (1886), pp. 157–78.Google Scholar
Henking, H., 1894. Beiträge zur Kenntnis von Hydrobia ulvaePenn. und deren Brutpflege. Ber. naturf. Ges. zu Freiburg i. B. VIII, pp.89–110.Google Scholar
Herdman, W., 1888–1889. Note in Second Annual Report of the Liverpool Marine Biological Station on Puffin Island. Proc. Liv. Biol. Soc. III, 1888–9.Google Scholar
Hertling, H., 1928. Beobachtung und Versuche an den Eiern von Littorina und Lacuna. Bedeutung der Eihüllen. Wiss. Meeres. Komm. Unt. deutsch. Meere, N.F., Abt. Helgoland, Bd. XVII, 2, 49 pp.Google Scholar
Hertling, H., 1932. Zur Kenntnis des Laichbandes und der Veligerlarven von Natica pulchella Risso. Zool. Anz. Bd. 100, pp. 95–100.Google Scholar
Hertling, H. & Ankel, W. E., 1927. Bemerkungen über Laich und Jugendformen von Littorina und Lacuna. Wiss. Meeres. Komm. Unt. deutsch. Meere, N.F., Abt. Helgoland, Bd. XVI, 7, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Howse, R., 1847. Notes on a Dredging Excursion off the Coast of Durham, with Descriptions of the Ova-capsules of Fusus norvegicus and F. turtoni. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Vol. XIX, pp. 160–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G., 1863–1869. British Conchology, Vol. II,1863; Vol. III, 1865 Vol. IV,1867; Vol. v, 1869.Google Scholar
Krohn, A., 1853. Über einen neuen, mit Wimpersegeln versehenen Gasteropoden. Arch. Naturgesch. XIX. Jahrg. pp. 223–5.Google Scholar
Krohn, A., 1855. Nachtrag zu dem Aufsatze über die Echinospira diaphana. Arch. Naturgesch. XXI. Jahrg. pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Krohn, A., 1857. Fernere Nachträge zu dem Aufsatze über Echinospira nebst Beobachtungen über eine ihr verwandte Larve. Arch. Naturgesch. XXIII. Jahrg. pp. 252–61.Google Scholar
Lamy, E., 1928. La Ponte chez les Gastéropodes prosobranches. Journ. Conchyliologie Vol. LXXII, pp. 25–52, 80–126.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1931a. The larval stages of Nassarius reticulatus and Nassarius incrassatus. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVII, No. 3, pp. 797–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1931b. The larval stages of Trivia europea. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVII, No. 3, pp. 819–32.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1932a. The larval stages of Simnia patula. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, No. 1, May, pp. 107–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1932b. The eggs and early larval stages of two commensal gastropods, Stilifer stylifer and Odostomia eulimoides. Journ. Mar.Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, pp. 117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1933a. The British species of Trivia: T. arctica and T. monacha. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, No. 2, Jan., pp. 477–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1933b. The larval stages of Erato voluta (Montagu). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, No. 2, pp. 485–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1933c. The life-histories of Cerithiopsis tubercularis (Montagu), C. barleei Jeffreys and Triphora perversa (L.). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, No. 2, pp. 491–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1933d. The eggs and larvae of Turritella communis Lamarck and Aporrhais pespelicani (L.). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, No. 2, pp. 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1933e. The eggs and larvae of Philbertia gracilis (Montagu). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, No. 2, pp. 507–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1933f. The importance of larval Mollusca in the plankton. Journ. Cons. Int. Expl. Mer, Vol. VIII, No. 3, pp. 335–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1934a. Rissoid larvae as food of the young herring. The eggs and larvae of the Plymouth Rissoidae. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol.XIX, No. 2, May, pp. 523–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1934b. The eggs and larvae of some British Turridae. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIX, No. 2, May, pp. 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1935 a. The echinospira larvae of Plymouth. Proc.Zool. Soc. London, pp. 163–74.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1935b. The breeding of Littorina neritoides. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XX, No. 2, Aug., pp. 373–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1936. Notes on the eggs and larvae of some Plymouth prosobranchs. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XX, No. 3, pp. 547–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linke, O., 1933a. Morphologie und Physiologie des Genitalsapparates der Nordseelittorinen. Wiss. Meeres. Komm. Unt. deutsch. Meere in Kiel und der Biol. Anst. Helgoland, N.F., Helgoland, Bd. XIX, 5, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Linke, O., 1933b. Der Laich von Skeneopsis planorbis O. Fabricius (Gastrop. Prosobranch.). Zool. Anz., Bd. 103, Heft 11/12, pp. 207–11.Google Scholar
Linke, O., 1935. Der Laich von Littorina (Melaraphe) neritoides (L.). Zool. Anz., Bd. 112, Heft 3/4, pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
Lovén, H., 1839. Bidrag till Kanmadomen af Molluskernas utveckling. Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademien Handlingar Stockholm för år 1839, pp. 227–41.Google Scholar
Lovén, H., 1844. Om Nordiska Hafs-Mollusken. Öfversight af Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akade-mien Förhandlingar Stockholm första ărgăngen, pp. 48–53.Google Scholar
Lund, A., 1834. Recherches sur les enveloppes d'œufs des Mollusques gastéropodes pectinibranches. Ann. Sci. Nat., S. 2, Zool., T. I, pp. 84–112.Google Scholar
MacBride, E. W., 1914. Text-book of Embryology, Vol. I, Mollusca, pp. 291–371.Google Scholar
Macdonald, J., 1855. Note in Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 2, Vol. XVI, pp. 206–7 (Proc. of Learned Societies, April 26).Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. D., 1859. On the probable metamorphosis of Pedicularia and other forms. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Vol. XXII, pp. 241–3.Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. D., 1860. Further observations on the metamorphosis of Gasteropoda. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Vol. XXIII, pt. 1, pp. 69–82.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. A. & Möbius, K., 1872. Fauna der Kieler Bucht, Bd. 2, Die Prosobranchia und Lamellibranchia, pp. I–XXIV, 1–139.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H., 1832. In Audouin & Milne-Edwards. Recherches Hist. Nat. litt. France.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1937. The biology of Littorina littorea. Part I. Growth of the shell and tissues, spawning, length of life and mortality. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, No. 2, pp. 721–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, F. W., 1932. Notes on Trochus niloticus. Great Barrier Reef Expedition, 1928–29. Scientific Reports, Vol. III, No. 5, British Museum (Natural History), PP 145–55Google Scholar
Odhner, N. H., 1914. Notizen über die Fauna der Adria bei Rovigno.Beiträge zur Kenntnis der marinen Molluskenfauna von Rovigno in Istrien. Zool. Anz., Bd. 44, pp. 156–70.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1912–13. An American enemy of the English oyster farmer.Trans. PlymouthInstitution, pp. 247–61.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H.,1928. Observations on Patella vulgata. Part I. Sex phenomena, breeding and shell-growth. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XV. No. 3, pp. 851–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. H. & Amirthalingam, C., 1929. The oyster drills on English oyster beds. Nature, Vol. CXXIV, Aug. 24, pp. 298–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, W., 1886. The embryology of Patella. Arb. Zool.Inst. Wien, Bd. VI, pp. 149–74Google Scholar
Peach, C. W., 1858. A few remarks on Lamellaria tentaculata and its nidification, etc., as observed at Wick. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edinburgh, Vol. 1, pp. 455–8.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1894. Introduction à l'e´tude des Mollusques, pp. 1–217. Bruxelles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1906. Mollusca in A Treatise on Zoology, edited by E. Ray Lankester, Part V, PP. 1–355.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1910. Glandes pédieuses et coques ovigères des Gastropodes. Bull. Sci. France Belgique, T. XLIV, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1911. Recherches sur l'embryologie des Gastropodes. Mém. Acad. Royale Belgique, 2e Sér., T. III, pp. 1–167.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1926. Notes d'Embryologie malacologique. Ponte et developpement de Cypraea europea, Triforis perversa et Lucina lactea. Bull. Biol. France Belgique, T. LX, pp. 88–112.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1932. La métamorphose préadulte des Cypraeidae. Bull. Biol. France Belgique, T. LXVI, 2, pp. 149–63.Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B., 1930. New species of New Zealand Mollusca from shallow-water dredgings. Trans, and Proc. N.Z. Inst., Vol. 60, Part 4, pp. 532–43.Google Scholar
Robert, A., 1902. Recherches sur le Développement des Troques. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén., 3e Sér., X, pp. 269–538.Google Scholar
Schilder, F. A., 1936. Anatomical characters of the Cypraeacea which confirm the conchological classification. Proc. Malacol. Soc., Vol. XXII, Part II, pp. 75–112.Google Scholar
Simroth, H., 1895. Die Gastropoden der Plankton-Expedition. Erg. d. Plank. Exp. der Humboldt-Stiftung, Bd. II, F.d. pp. 1–206.Google Scholar
Simroth, H., 1896–1907. Mollusca in Bronn's Tierreich, Bd. III, Abt. 11, Gastropoda Prosobranchia, pp. 628–720.Google Scholar
Simroth, H., 1911. Die Gastropoden des Nordischen Planktons. Nordisches Plankton, v, pp.1–36.Google Scholar
Smith, F. G. W., 1935. The Development of Patella vulgata. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. No. 520, Vol. 225, pp. 95–125.Google Scholar
Stephenson, T. A., 1924. Notes on Haliotis tuberculata. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIII, No. 2, pp. 480–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersall, W. M., 1908. British Association Reports, Dublin, p. 746; Nature, Vol. 78, Oct. 22, 1908, p. 649.Google Scholar
Tattersall, W. M., 1910. Athenaeum, Feb. 13, pp. 203–4, and at the Challenger Society, Jan. 1910,Google Scholar
Tattersall, W. M., 1920. Notes on the breeding habits and life-history of the periwinkle. Fisheries-Ireland. Sci. Inv. 1920, No. 1, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Thiele, J., 1929. Handbuch der systematischer Weichtierkunde, Teil. 1–2, pp. 1–778.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1935. Studies of the egg capsules and development of Arctic marine prosobranchs. Medd. om Grønland, Bd. 100, Nr. 5, pp. 1–71.Google Scholar
Tryon, G. W., 1881. Manual of Conchology, 310 pp.Google Scholar
Vayssiére, A., 1923. Recherches zoologiques et anatomiques sur les Mollusques de la famille desCypraeidés. Iére Partie. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. Marseille, Zool., T. XVIII, pp. 1–120.Google Scholar
Vayssiére, A., 1930. Étude zoologique et anatomique sur quelques gastéropodes Prosobranches provenant des Campagnes Scientifiques du Prince Albert Ier de Monaco. Rés. Camp. Sci. Albert Ier, Fasc. LXXX, 1930, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E., 1882. Catalogue of Marine Mollusca, added to the Fauna of New England during ten years. Part I. Trans. Connect. Acad. Sci. and Arts v, pp. 447– 586.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, K., 1935. Über den Laich und die Larven von Scalaria communis (Lam.), Nassarius pygmaeus (Lam.) und Bela turricola (Mont.). Zool. Anz., Bd. 109, Heft ⅞, pp. 217–22.Google Scholar
Watson, R. B., 1885. On the Cerithiopsides from the eastern side of the North Atlantic. Journ. Linn. Soc., Vol. XXIX, pp. 89–95.Google Scholar
Wegmann, H., 1884. Contribution à l'Histoire Naturelle des Haliotides. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén., 2e Sér., II, pp. 289–378.Google Scholar
Willcox, M. A., 1905. Biology of Acmaea testudinalis Müll. American Naturalist, Vol. XXXIX, pp. 325–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. B., 1904. Experimental studies in germinal localization. (1)The germ region in the egg of Dentalium. (2) Experiments on the cleavage-mosaic in Patella and Dentalium. Journ. Exp. Zool., Vol. I, pp. 197–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winckworth, R., 1932. The British marine Mollusca. Journ. Conch., Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 211–52.Google Scholar
Winckworth, R., 1934. Names of British Mollusca. II. Journ. Conch., Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 9–15.Google Scholar
Crofts', Miss D. R. monograph “The Development of Haliotis tuberculata, with special reference to Organogenesis during Torsion” (Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci., No. 552, Vol. 228, Oct. 1937) arrived too late to be included in the present work.Google Scholar