Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:15:09.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Movement On Population Density Estimates of Mudflat Epifauna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R.S.K. Barnes
R.S.K. Barnes
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The soft-sediment marine benthos is well-known to be patchily distributed. To test whether this could be caused by individual epifaunal movement, spatial and temporal variation in numbers of adult mudsnails, Hydrobia ulvae, were analysed within an area of 40 m2 on an intertidal mudflat over periods of 4 or 6 d on three occasions, two of spring tides and one of neap. Significant spatial variation was always present, and significant temporal variation occurred during the spring tides. There was no variation dependent on the numbers of replicate samples taken from each station. Furthermore, movement of large, individually marked winkles, Littorina saxatilis, in the same habitat was measured and shown to be significantly directional over three series of spring tides, although the mean angle of movement varied widely between the different tidal series; storm-induced movement was particularly large. Such directional movement could account for the temporal and spatial variation seen in H. ulvae. Distances moved by winkles under permanently submerged conditions, however, did not display any directional component. Estimates of the population density and dispersion of potentially mobile or movable, intertidal epibenthos obtained on a series of individual, widely spaced days must therefore be treated with caution, however much replicated on any given occasion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , May 1998 , pp. 377 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A.A., 1971. Intertidal activity, breeding and the floating habit of Hydrobia ulvae in the Ythan Estuary. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armonies, W., 1992. Migratory rhythms of drifting juvenile molluscs in tidal waters of the Wadden Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 83, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J.M. & Wolff, W.J., ed., 1987. Biological surveys of estuaries and coasts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, R.S.K., 1981. Behavioural activities and ecological strategies in the intertidal gastropod Hydrobia ulvae. In Feeding and survival strategies of estuarine organisms (ed. N.V., Jones and W.J., Wolff), pp. 79–90. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R.S.K., 1994. Macrofaunal community structure and life histories in coastal lagoons. In Coastal lagoon processes (ed. B., Kjerfve), pp. 311–362. Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R.S.K., 1996. Breeding, recruitment and survival in a mixed intertidal population of the mudsnails Hydrobia ulvae and H. neglecta. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 76, 1003–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brafield, A.E. & Newell, G.E., 1961. The behaviour of Macoma balthica (L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 41, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, P. & Arias, A.M., 1995. Distribution and production of three Hydrobia species (Gastropoda: Hydrobiidae) in a shallow coastal lagoon in the Bay of Cadiz, Spain. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 61, 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holme, N.A. & McIntyre, A.D., ed., 1984. Methods for the study of marine benthos, 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Little, C. & Nix, W., 1976. The burrowing and floating behaviour of the gastropod Hydrobia ulvae. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 4, 537–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardia, K.V., 1972. Statistics of directional data. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McIntyre, A.D., Elliott, J.M. & Ellis, D.V., 1984. Introduction: design of sampling programmes. In Methods for the study of marine benthos, 2nd ed. (ed. N.A., Holme and A.D., McIntyre), pp. 1–26. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Morrisey, D.J., Howitt, L., Underwood, A.J. & Stark, J.S., 1992. Spatial variation in soft-sediment benthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 81, 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, G.E., 1958. The behaviour of Littorina littorea (L.) under natural conditions and its relation to position on the shore. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probert, P.K., 1984. Disturbance, sediment stability, and trophic structure of soft-bottom communities. Journal of Marine Research, 42, 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varnell, L.M., Havens, K.J. & Hershner, C., 1995. Daily variability in abundance and population characteristics of tidal salt-marsh fauna. Estuaries, 18, 326–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volckaert, F., 1987. Spatial pattern of soft-bottom Polychaeta off Nova Scotia. Marine Biology, 93, 627–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W.H., 1988. Shifting zones in a Bay of Fundy soft-sediment community: patterns and processes. Ophelia, 29, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar