Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:55:29.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of shipwrecks on associated fish assemblages in the central Mediterranean Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2014

Pierpaolo Consoli*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Milazzo, ISPRA, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, via dei Mille 44, 98057 Milazzo, ME, Italy
Andrea Martino
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Milazzo, ISPRA, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, via dei Mille 44, 98057 Milazzo, ME, Italy
Teresa Romeo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Milazzo, ISPRA, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, via dei Mille 44, 98057 Milazzo, ME, Italy
Mauro Sinopoli
Affiliation:
ISPRA, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, c/o Residence Marbela, via Salvatore Puglisi 9, 90143 Palermo, Italy
Patrizia Perzia
Affiliation:
ISPRA, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, c/o Residence Marbela, via Salvatore Puglisi 9, 90143 Palermo, Italy
Simonepietro Canese
Affiliation:
ISPRA, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Via Vitaliano Brancati, 48, 00166 Roma, Italy
Pietro Vivona
Affiliation:
ISPRA, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, c/o Residence Marbela, via Salvatore Puglisi 9, 90143 Palermo, Italy
Franco Andaloro
Affiliation:
ISPRA, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, c/o Residence Marbela, via Salvatore Puglisi 9, 90143 Palermo, Italy
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: P. Consoli, Laboratory of Milazzo, ISPRA, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, via dei Mille 4498057 Milazzo, ME, Italy email: [email protected]

Abstract

Understanding the role played by sunken vessels in Mediterranean marine ecosystems is acquiring increasing importance. The aim of this research was to study the fish communities associated with four shipwrecks, by means of underwater visual censuses performed by a remotely operated vehicle, and to test the differences in composition of fish assemblages between these shipwrecks and the adjacent soft bottoms, considered as control sites. Multivariate analysis on the total fish assemblage showed significant differences between wrecks and controls. Results also showed higher levels of species richness and abundance near all wrecks than at a short distance from them on soft bottoms, thus indicating that these sunken vessels, thanks to their higher habitat complexity, act as artificial reefs, attracting aggregations of fish species and leading to a greater diversification of the local fish assemblage. Nevertheless, shipwrecks, which are an ideal target for recreational fishermen, could contribute to the over-exploitation of some high-value fish species, such as Mycteroperca rubra, Dentex dentex and Diplodus spp., attracted by the artificial hard substrate of the vessel-reefs. The recent European directives suggest an urgent need for a better understanding of the crucial role played by these potential sources of pollutants on marine environments and ecosystems. An ecosystem approach to study and monitor these pollutant sources is, therefore, mandatory for appropriate remediation and/or mitigation of the potential negative effects on a productive and healthy ocean.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almany, G.R. (2004a) Differential effects of habitat complexity, predators and competitors on abundance of juvenile and adult coral reef fishes. Oecologia 141, 105113.Google Scholar
Almany, G.R. (2004b) Does increased habitat complexity reduce predation and competition in coral reef fish assemblages? Oikos 106, 275284.Google Scholar
Andaloro, F., Castriota, L., Ferraro, M., Romeo, T., Sarà, G. and Consoli, P. (2011) Evaluating fish assemblages associated with gas platforms: evidence from visual census techniques and experimental fishing surveys. Ciencias Marinas 37, 19.Google Scholar
Andaloro, F., Ferraro, M., Mostarda, E., Romeo, T. and Consoli, P. (2012) Assessing the suitability of a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) to study the fish community associated with offshore gas platforms in the Ionian Sea: a comparative analysis with underwater visual censuses (UVCs). Helgoland Marine Research 67, 241250.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J. (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26, 3246.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J., Gorley, R.N. and Clarke, K.R. (2008) PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J. and Legendre, P. (1999) An empirical comparison of permutation methods for tests of partial regression coefficients in a linear model. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 62, 271303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M.J. and ter Braak, C.J.F. (2003) Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 73, 85113.Google Scholar
Arena, P.T., Jordan, L.K.B. and Spieler, R.E. (2007) Fish assemblages on sunken vessels and natural reefs in southeast Florida, USA. Hydrobiologia 580, 157171.Google Scholar
Bell, J.D. and Galzin, R. (1984) Influence of live coral cover on coral reef fish communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 15, 265274.Google Scholar
Bell, S.S., McCoy, E.D. and Mushinsky, H.R. (1991) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Bohnsack, J.A., Johnson, D.L. and Ambrose, R.F. (1991) Ecology of artificial reef habitats and fishes. In Seaman, W. Jr and Sprague, L.M. (eds) Artificial habitats for marine and freshwater fisheries. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 61107.Google Scholar
Buckley, R.M. (1982) Marine habitat enhancement and urban recreational fishing in Washington. Marine Fisheries Review 44, 2837.Google Scholar
Caley, M.J. and St John, J. (1996) Refuge availability structures assemblages of tropical reef fishes. Journal of Animal Ecology 65, 414428.Google Scholar
Chandler, C.R., Sanders, R.M. Jr and Landry, A.M. Jr (1985) Effects of three substrate variables on two artificial reef fish communities. Bulletin of Marine Science 37, 129142.Google Scholar
Chang, K., Lee, S.C. and Shao, K.T. (1977) Evaluation of artificial reef efficiency based on the studies of model reef fish community installed in northern Taiwan. Bulletin Institute of the Zoology, Academia Sinica 16, 2336.Google Scholar
Charbonnel, E., Serre, C., Ruitton, S., Harmelin, J.G. and Jensen, A. (2002) Effects of increased habitat complexity on fish assemblages associated with large artificial reef units (French Mediterranean coast). ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, 208213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. 2nd edition. Plymouth: PRIMER-E, 172 pp.Google Scholar
Consoli, P., Azzurro, E., Sarà, G., Ferraro, M. and Andaloro, F. (2007) Fish diversity associated to gas platforms: evaluation of two underwater visual census. Ciencias Marinas 33, 121132.Google Scholar
Consoli, P., Romeo, T., Ferraro, M., Sarà, G. and Andaloro, F. (2013) Factors affecting fish assemblages associated with gas platforms in the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Sea Research 77, 4552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabi, G., Grati, F., Lucchetti, A. and Trovarelli, L. (2002a) Evolution of the fish assemblage around a gas platform in the northern Adriatic Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, 309315.Google Scholar
Fabi, G., Grati, F., Puletti, M. and Scarcella, G. (2004) Effects on fish community induced by installation of two gas platforms in the Adriatic Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 273, 187194.Google Scholar
Fabi, G., Luccarini, F., Panfili, M., Solustri, C. and Spagnolo, A. (2002b) Effects of an artificial reef on the surrounding soft-bottom community (central Adriatic Sea). ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, 343349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagundes-Netto, E.B., Gaelzer, L.R., Coutinho, R. and Zalmon, I.R. (2011) Influence of a shipwreck on a nearshore-reef fish assemblages off the coast of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 39, 103116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francour, P., Liret, C. and Harvey, E. (1999) Comparison of fish abundance estimates made by remote underwater video and visual census. Il Naturalista Siciliano 23, 155168.Google Scholar
Frontier, S. (1986) La méthode des cotations d'abondance appliquée aux pêcheries artisanales. In Frontier, S. (ed.) Evaluation et optimisation des plans d’échantillonnage en écologie littorale. Piren, ATP 9-82-65. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, pp. 262285.Google Scholar
Garcia Charton, J.A. and Pérez Ruzafa, A. (2008) Correlation between habitat structure and a rocky reef fish assemblage in the Southwest Mediterranean. Marine Ecology 19, 111128.Google Scholar
Gorham, J.C. and Alevizon, W.S. (1989) Habitat complexity and the abundance of juvenile fishes residing on small scale artificial reefs. Bulletin of Marine Science 44, 662665.Google Scholar
Gratwicke, B. and Speight, M.R. (2005) The relationship between fish species richness, abundance and habitat complexity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats. Journal of Fish Biology 66, 650667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidetti, P., Terlizzi, A., Fraschetti, S. and Boero, F. (2003) Changes in Mediterranean rocky-reef fish assemblages exposed to sewage pollution. Marine Ecology Progress Series 253, 269278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, B.C., White, J.L. and Nakamoto, R.J. (2005) Habitat specific biomass, survival, and growth of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) during summer in a small coastal stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries Aquatic Sciences 62, 650658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higo, N., Hashi, H., Takahama, I., Tabata, S., Nagashima, M., Sakono, S., Kasmimizutara, T. and Yamasaki, T. (1980) On the fish gathering effect of the artificial reefs ascertained by the diving observation. VII. At the sea off Maskurazak City. Memoirs of the Faculty of Fisheries, Kagoshima University 29, 5163.Google Scholar
Hixon, M.A. and Beets, J.P. (1989) Shelter characteristics and Caribbean fish assemblages: experiments with artificial reefs. Bulletin of Marine Science 44, 666680.Google Scholar
Hixon, M.A. and Beets, J.P. (1993) Predation, prey refuges, and the structure of coral-reef fish assemblages. Ecology Monographs 63, 77101.Google Scholar
Hixon, M.A. and Menge, B.A. (1991) Species diversity: prey refuges modify the interactive effects of predation and competition. Theoretical Population Biology 39, 178200.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.C., Collins, K.J. and Lockwood, A.P.M. (2000) Artificial reefs in European seas. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Jones, G.P. (1988) Experimental evaluation of the effects of habitat structure and competitive interactions on the juveniles of two coral reef fishes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 123, 115126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassau, S.A. and Hochuli, D.F. (2004) Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 27, 157164.Google Scholar
Lindquist, D.G. and Pietrafesa, L.J. (1989) Current vortices and fish aggregations: the current field and associated fishes around a tugboat wreck in Onslow Bay, North Carolina. Bulletin of Marine Science 44, 533544.Google Scholar
Love, M.S. and Nishimoto, M.M. (2012) Completion of fish assemblage surveys around manmade structures and natural reefs off California. Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California. BOEM OCS Study 2012-020.Google Scholar
Love, M.S., Nishimoto, M.M. and Schroeder, D.M. (2010) Fish assemblages associated with platforms and natural reefs in areas where data are non-existent or limited. Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California. BOEMRE OCS Study 2010-012.Google Scholar
Love, M.S., Schroeder, D.M., Lenarz, W., MacCall, A., Bull, A.S. and Thorsteinson, L. (2006) Potential use of offshore marine structures in rebuilding an overfished rockfish species, bocaccio (Sebastes paucispinis). Fishery Bulletin 104, 383390.Google Scholar
Love, M.S., Schroeder, D.M. and Nishimoto, M.M. (2003) The ecological role of oil and gas production platforms and natural outcrops on fishes in southern and central California: a synthesis of information. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Seattle, Washington, 98104, OCS Study MMS 2003–032.Google Scholar
Love, M.S. and York, A. (2006) The role of bottom crossbeam complexity in influencing the fish assemblages at California oil and gas platforms. Fishery Bulletin 104, 542549.Google Scholar
Luckhurst, B.E. and Luckhurst, K. (1978) Analysis of the influence of the substrate variables on coral reef fish communities. Marine Biology 49, 317323.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R.H. and Levins, R. (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence and divergence of coexisting species. American Naturalist 101, 377385.Google Scholar
Macpherson, E. (1994) Substrate utilization in a Mediterranean littoral fish community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 114, 211218.Google Scholar
McArdle, B.H. and Anderson, M.J. (2001) Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82, 290297.Google Scholar
McClanahan, T.R. (1994) Kenyan coral reef lagoon: effects of fishing, substrate complexity, and sea urchins. Coral Reefs 13, 231241.Google Scholar
McCormick, M.I. (1994) Comparison of field methods for measuring surface topography and their associations with a tropical reef fish community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 112, 8796.Google Scholar
Öhman, M.C. and Rajasuriya, A. (1998) Relationships between habitat structure and fish communities on coral and sandstone reefs. Environmental Biology of Fishes 53, 1931.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2012) The environmental impact of sunken shipwrecks. Resolution 1869.Google Scholar
Rilov, G. and Benayahu, Y. (1998) Vertical artificial structures as an alternative habitat for coral reef fishes in disturbed environments. Marine Environmental Research 45, 431451.Google Scholar
Rilov, G. and Benayahu, Y. (2000) Fish assemblage on natural vs. vertical artificial reefs: the rehabilitation perspective. Marine Biology 36, 931942.Google Scholar
Rilov, G. and Benayahu, Y. (2002) Rehabilitation of coral reef-fish communities: the importance of artificial-reef relief to recruitment rates. Bulletin of Marine Science 70, 185197.Google Scholar
Roberts, C.M. and Ormond, R.F.G. (1987) Habitat complexity and coral reef fish diversity and abundance on Red Sea fringing reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 41, 18.Google Scholar
Rooker, J.R., Dokken, Q.R., Pattengill, C.V. and Holt, G.J. (1997) Fish assemblages on artificial and natural reefs in the Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary, USA. Coral Reefs 16, 8392.Google Scholar
Scarcella, G., Grati, F. and Fabi, G. (2011) Temporal and spatial variation of the fish assemblage around a gas platform in the Northern Adriatic Sea, Italy. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 11, 433444.Google Scholar
Seaman, W. and Jensen, A.C. (2000) Purposes and practices of artificial reef evaluation. In Seaman, W. (ed.) Artificial reef evaluation: with application to natural marine habitats. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Smith, M.P.L. (1988) Effects of observer swimming speed on sample counts of temperate rocky reef fish assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 43, 223231.Google Scholar
Sprovieri, M., Barra, M., Del Core, M., Di Martino, G., Giaramita, L., Gherardi, S., Innangi, S., Oliveri, E., Passaro, S., Romeo, T., Rumolo, P., Manta, D.S., Tamburrino, S., Tonielli, R., Traina, A., Tranchida, G., Vallefuoco, M., Mazzola, S. and Andaloro, F. (2013) Marine pollution from shipwrecks at the sea bottom: a case study from the Mediterranean Basin. In Hughes, T. B. (ed.) Mediterranean Sea: ecosystems, economic importance and environmental threats. New York: Nova Publishers, pp. 3564.Google Scholar
Tessier, E., Chabanet, P., Pothin, K., Soria, M. and Lasserre, G. (2005) Visual census of tropical fish aggregations on artificial reefs: slate versus video recording techniques. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 315, 1730.Google Scholar
Warfe, D.M. and Barmuta, L.A. (2004) Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia 141, 171178.Google Scholar
Willis, S.C., Winemiller, K.O. and Lopez-Fernandez, H. (2005) Habitat structural complexity and morphological diversity of fish assemblages in a neotropical floodplain river. Oecologia 142, 284295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, T.J. (2001) Visual census methods underestimate density and diversity of cryptic reef fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 59, 14011408.Google Scholar