Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:32:11.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of particle size on the burying ability of the brown shrimp Crangon crangon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Eunice H. Pinn
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Molecular Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA. Present address: University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, KA28 0EG.
Alan D. Ansell
Affiliation:
Present address: University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, KA28 0EG. Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, PO Box 3, Oban, PA34 4AD

Extract

The burial mechanism of Crangon crangon was examined in detail using high-speed video-recording equipment. Four stages of burial were identified which were associated with three modes of burial. As the mode of burial changed, a change in the angle of substratum penetration was also noted.

The effect of particle size on the burying ability of three discrete size classes of shrimp was examined using both artificially graded and naturally occurring sediments. Particle size was found to be a major influencing factor on the degree of burial achieved by C. crangon, but no significant effect of shrimp size on burying ability was found over the size range tested.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Adhub, A. H. Y. & Naylor, E., 1975. Emergence rhythms and tidal migrations of the brown shrimp Crangon crangon (L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 801810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R. R., Stanton, R. J. & Dodd, J. R., in press. Influence of sediment grain size on the burrowing of bivalves: correlation with distribution and stratigraphic persistence of selected neogene clams. Palaios.Google Scholar
Arnold, G. P. & Weihs, D., 1978. The hydrodynamics of rheotaxis in the plaice (Pleumnectes platessa L.). Journal of Experimental Biology, 75, 147169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aziz, K. A. & Greenwood, J. G., 1982. Response of juvenile Metapenaeus bennettae Racek & Dall, 1965 (Decapoda, Penaeidae) to sediments of differing particle size. Crustaceana, 43, 121126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. C. & Trueman, E. R., 1991. Burrowing of sandy-beach molluscs in relation to penetrability of the substratum. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 57, 134136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. B. & Kain, J. M., 1971. Measurement of the physical and chemical environment. In Methods for the study of marine benthos (ed. Holme, N. A. and McIntyre, A. D.), pp. 3058. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Cook, P. H., 1985. The behaviour of the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) in relation to bottom current and sediment type. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
Dall, W., 1958. Observations on the biology of the greentail prawn, Metapenaeus mastersii (Haswell) (Crustacea Decapoda: Penaeidae). Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 9, 111134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, W., Hill, B. J., Rothlisberg, P. C. & Sharpies, D. J., 1990. Behavioural responses to the environment. Advances in Marine Biology, 27, 333356.Google Scholar
Freundlich, H. & Röder, H. L., 1938. Dilatancy and its relation to thixotropy. Transactions of the Faraday Society, London, 31, 308316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuss, C. M. Jr, 1964. Observations on burrowing behavior of the pink shrimp, Penaeus duorarum Burkenroad. Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean, 14, 6273.Google Scholar
Fuss, C. M. Jr & Ogren, L. H., 1966. Factors affecting activity and burrowing habits of the pink shrimp, Penaeus duorarum Burkenroad. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 130, 170191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. N. & Robb, L., 1992. The relationship between body size, sediment grain size and the burying ability of juvenile plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L. Journal of Fish Biology, 40, 771778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, P. A. & Holmes, R. H. A., 1987. On the population biology of the common shrimp Crangon crangon (L.) (Crustacea: Caridea) in the Severn Estuary and Bristol Channel. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 67, 825847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, P. A., Seaby, R. & Marsh, S. J., 1990. The population zoogeography of the common shrimp (Crangon crangon) in British waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 70, 8997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindley, J. P. R, 1975. Effects of endogenous and some exogenous factors on the activity of the juvenile banana prawn Penaeus merguiensis. Marine Biology, 29, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, B. R. & Canario, A. V. M., 1987. The influence of sand on the estimation of resting metabolic rate of juvenile sole, Solea solea (L.). Journal of Fish Biology, 31, 277280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, M. L., 1992. Behavioral avoidance of predation in an intertidal hermit crab. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 157, 143158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, A. J. & Yonge, C. M., 1947. The biology of Crangon vulgaris L. in the Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 26, 626661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minello, T. J., Zimmerman, R. J. & Martinez, E. X., 1987. Fish predation on juvenile brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus Ives: effects of turbidity and substratum on predation rates. Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, DC, 85, 5970.Google Scholar
Moller, T. H. & Jones, D. A., 1975. Locomotory rhythms and burrowing habits of Penaeus semisulcatus (de Haan) and P. monodon (Fabricius) (Crustacea: Penaeidae). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 18, 6177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otazu-Abrill, M. & Ceccaldi, H. J., 1981. Contribution à l'étude du comportement de Penaeus japonicus (Crustacé, Décapode) en élevage, vis-à-vis de la lumiére et du sédiment. Téthys, 10, 149156.Google Scholar
Peyraud, C. & Labat, R., 1962. Réactions cardio-respiratoires observées chez la sole au cours de l'ensablement. Hydrobiologia, 19, 351356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruello, N. V., 1973. Burrowing, feeding, and spatial distribution of the school prawn Metapenaeus macleayi (Haswell) in the Hunter River region, Australia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 13, 189206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rulifson, R. A., 1981. Substrate preferences of juvenile penaeid shrimps in estuarine habitats. Contributions in Marine Science. University of Texas, 24, 3552.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L., 1958. Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. I. Animal-sediment relationships. Limnology and Oceanography, 3, 245258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smaldon, G., 1979. British coastal shrimps and prawns. Keys and notes for the identification of the species. Synopses of the British Fauna, New Series, Linnean Society. London, no. 15, 126 pp.Google Scholar
Stein, R. A. & Magnuson, J. J., 1976. Behavioral response of crayfish to a fish predator. Ecology, 57, 751761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiews, K., 1970. Synopsis of biological data on the common shrimp Crangon crangon (Linnaeus, 1758). FAO Fisheries Reports, no. 57, 11671224.Google Scholar
Trueman, E. R. & Ansell, A. D., 1969. The mechanisms of burrowing into soft substrata by marine animals. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review. London, 7, 315366.Google Scholar
Webb, J. E., 1969. Biologically significant properties of submerged marine sands. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (B), 174, 355402.Google Scholar
Williams, A. B., 1958. Substrates as a factor in shrimp distribution. Limnology and Oceanography, 3, 283290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar