Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:19:29.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Mytilicola Intestinalis on the Biochemical Composition of Mussels1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. S. Williams
C. S. Williams
Affiliation:
Biological Laboratories, The Polytechnic, Regent Street, London, W.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The biochemical constituents of mussels both infected and free from the copepod parasite Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer have been determined over a period of 2 years. All the constituents except moisture content (i.e. lipid, protein, carbohydrate and ash) were determined from dried mussel flesh, and all showed seasonal variation, the changes of which were correlated to the breeding cycle of the mussel.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , February 1969 , pp. 161 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansell, A. D., Loosmore, F. A. & Lander, K. F., 1964. Studies on the hard shell clam Venus mercenaria in British waters. II. Seasonal cycle in condition and biochemical composition. J. appl. Ecol., Vol. 1, pp. 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H., Barnes, M. & Finlayson, D. M., 1963. The seasonal changes in body weight, biochemical composition, and oxygen uptake of two common boreo-arctic cirripedes, Balanus balanoides and B. balanus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolster, G. C., 1954. The biology and dispersal of Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer. Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Brand, T., 1966. Biochemistry of Parasites. 429 pp. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, T. C., 1965. Histochemical observations on changes in the lipid composition of the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin), parasitized by the Trematode Bucephalus sp. J. Invert. Path., Vol. 7, pp. 398–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, T. C. & Burton, R. W., 1966. Relationships between Bucephalus sp. and Crassostrea virginica: a histochemical study of some carbohydrates and carbohydrate complexes occurring in the host and parasite. Parasitology, Vol. 56, pp. 111–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chipperfield, P. N. J., 1953. Observations on the breeding and settlement of Mytilus edulis (L.) in British waters. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 449–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couteaux-Bargeton, M., 1953. Contribution à l'étude de Mytilus edulis L. parasite par Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 19, pp. 80–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniell, R. J., 1920. Seasonal changes in the chemical composition of the mussel (Mytilus edulis). Rep. Lanes. Sea-Fish. Labs, 1920, pp. 74–84.Google Scholar
Daniell, R. J., 1921. Seasonal changes in the chemical composition of the mussel (Mytilus edulis), continued. Rep. Lanes. Sea-Fish. Labs, 1921, pp. 205–21.Google Scholar
Daniell, R. J., 1922. Seasonal changes in the chemical composition of the mussel (Mytilus edulis), concluded. Rep. Lanes. Sea-Fish. Labs, 1922, pp. 27–50.Google Scholar
Fraga, F., 1956 a. Average seasonal variation of chemical constituents of the mussel (M. edulis). Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 140, p. 35.Google Scholar
Fraga, F., 1956 b. Variatión estaciónal de la composition quimica del mejillon (Mytilus edulis). Investigatión pesq., Vol. 4, pp. 109–25.Google Scholar
Giese, A. C., 1959. Comparative physiology: annual reproductive cycles of marine invertebrates. A. Rev. Physiol., Vol. 21, pp. 547–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giese, A. C., 1967. Some methods for study of the biochemical constitution of marine invertebrates. Oceanogr. mar. Biol., Vol. 5, pp. 159–86.Google Scholar
Hepper, B. T., 1955. Environmental factors governing the infection of mussels, Mytilusedulis,by Mytilicolaintestinalis. FisheryInvest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Korringa, P., 1952. Epidemiological observations on the mussel parasite Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer, carried out in the Netherlands, 1951. Annls biol., Copenh., Vol. 8, pp. 182–5.Google Scholar
Lubet, P., 1955. Le determinisme de la ponte chez les Lamellibranches (Mytilus edulis L.). C. r. hebd. Seanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, Vol. 241, pp. 254–6.Google Scholar
Mann, H., 1956. The influence of Mytilicola intestinalis (Copepoda parasitica) on the development of the gonads of Mytilus edulis. Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer., Vol. 140, pp. 57–8.Google Scholar
Mendel, B., Kemp, A. & Myers, D. K., 1954. A colorimetric micro-method for the determining of glucose. Biochem. J., Vol. 56, pp. 639–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, P. F. & Mann, H., 1950. Beitrage zur Epidemiologie und Physiologie des parasitischen Copepoden Mytilicola intestinalis. Arch. FischWiss., Bd. 2, pp. 120–34.Google Scholar
Sparks, A. K., 1962. Metaplasia of the gut of the oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg) caused by infection with the copepod Mytilicola orientalis Mori. J. Insect Path., Vol. 4, pp. 57–62.Google Scholar