Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:08:26.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Light of Different Intensities, Reduced Selectively and Non-selectively, upon the Rate of Growth of Nitzschia closterium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

F. A. Stanbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The effect of light upon plant growth is a problem which has attracted many workers since the discovery of Priestly, in 1771, that a plant could purify fixed air, carbon dioxide, which was followed by the supplementary work of Ingen-Housz and Senebier, who showed that the phenomenon was associated with the nourishment of the plant, and took place only in sunlight and through the agency of the green portions of the plant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , October 1931 , pp. 633 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J. 1914. On the culture of the Plankton Diatom Thallasiosira gravida Cleve, in Artificial Sea Water. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., 10, Vol. X, pp. 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, E. J. 1919. A Contribution to the Quantitative Study of Plankton. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XII.Google Scholar
Allen, E. J., and Nelson, E. W. 1910. On the Artificial Culture of Marine Plankton Organisms. Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci., Vol. LV, Pt. 2, p. 373.Google Scholar
Atkins, W. R. G., and Poole, H. H. 1926. Photo-electric measurements of illumination in relation to plant distribution. Part 1, Sci. Proc. Royal Dublin Soc., Vol. XVIII, No. 25, pp. 277–298.Google Scholar
Atkins, W. R. G., and Poole, H. H. 1929. 2. The photo-electric measurement of illumination in buildings. Loc.-cit., Vol. XIX, No. 18, pp. 173–188.Google Scholar
Atkins, W. R. G. 1928. Seasonal Variations in the Phosphate and Silicate Content of Sea-water during 1926 and 1927 in Relation to the Phytoplankton Crop. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XV, No. 1, pp. 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, W. R. G., and Poole, H. H. 1929. Methods for the Photo-electric and Photo-chemical Measurement of Daylight. Conference of Empire Meteorologists, 1929. Agricultural Sections.Google Scholar
Blackman, F. F. 1904. Chromatic Adaptation. New Phytologist, Vol. III, pp. 237–242.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P. A. 1927. Recherches sur l'assimilation chlorophyllienne et les questions qui s'y rattachent le Botaniste. Le Botaniste, Series XIX.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. 1929. Chlorophyll Content and Rate of Photosynthesis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 281–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerson, R. 1929. Photosynthesis as a function of Light Intensity and of Temperature with Different Concentrations of Chlorophyll. Journ. Gen. Physiol., Vol. XII, No. 5, pp. 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, R. 1929. Relation Between Maximum Rate of Photosynthesis and Concentration of Chlorophyll. Loc. cit., Vol. XII, No. 5, pp. 609–622.Google Scholar
Gage, H. P. 1924. Coloured Glass for Stage Illumination. Trans. Soc. Motion Picture Eng., U.S.A., May, 1924.Google Scholar
Hodgetts, 1922. A Study of some of the factors controlling the Periodicity of Freshwater Algae in Nature. New Phytologist, Vol. XX, pp. 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodak Co. 1925. Wratten Light Filters.Google Scholar
Klugh, Brooker A. 1925. Effect of Light of Different Wave Lengths on Rate of Reproduction of Volvox aurens and Closterium acerosum. New Phyt., Vol. XXIV, pp. 186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klugh, Brooker A. 1927. Light Penetration into the Bay of Fundy and into Lake Charncoot, New Brunswick. Ecology, Vol. 8, pp. 90–93.Google Scholar
Klugh, Brooker A. 1930. Studies on the Photosynthesis of Marine Algæ. No. 1. Photosynthetic Rates of Enteromorpha linza, Porphyra umbilicalis and Deleseria sinuosa, in Red, Green and Blue Light. Cont. to Canadian Biology and Fisheries, Vol. II, No. 1, pp. 41–63.Google Scholar
Mann, A. 1921. Dependence of Fishes on Diatoms. Ecology, Vol. II, No. 2, pp. 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. M., and Orr, A. P. 1928. Photosynthesis of Diatom cultures in the Sea. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XV, No. 1, pp.321–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miquel, . 1892. Recherches Experimentales sur la Physiologie, la Morphologie et la Pathologie Des Diatoms. Annals De Micrographie.Google Scholar
Poole, H. H., and Atkins, W. R. G. 1926. On the penetration of light into Sea-water. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XIV, No. 1, pp. 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, H. H., and Atkins, W. R. G. 1928 Further photo-electric measurements of the penetration of light into sea-water. Loc. cit., Vol. XV, No. 2, pp. 455–483.Google Scholar
Poole, H. H., and Atkins, W. R. G. 1929 Photo-electric measurements of submarine illumination throughout the year. Loc. cit., Vol. XVI, pp. 297–324.Google Scholar
Shirley, H. 1929. The influence of Light Intensity and Light Quality upon the Growth of Plants. Amer. Journ. Bot., Vol. XVI, pp. 354–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, W. 1925. Photosynthesis. London.Google Scholar