Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:15:06.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Eyestalk Removal, Wounding and Limb Loss Upon Moulting and Proecdysis in the Prawn Palaemon Elegans (Rathke)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

S. G. Webster
S. G. Webster
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Port Erin, Isle of Man
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most current literature concerning moult control in crustaceans concludes that initiation of premoult is controlled by changes in the level of moult-inhibiting hormone (MIH) produced by the eyestalk neurosecretory organs. MIH is thought to act by repressing the secretory activity of the Y-organs, preventing increases in circulating ecdysteriod levels, necessary for moulting (see Kleinholz & Keller, 1979). This hypothesis is based upon the observation that eyestalk removal, by removing the source of MIH, leads to accelerated moulting (see Passano, 1960; Vernet-Cornubert, 1961; Sochasky, 1973, for reviews), and it survives despite many contrary reports indicating that moulting is unaffected by eyestalk removal (Sochasky, 1973). Perhaps the best known of the most contradictory data of this nature have been reported for Palaemon serratus for which Drach (1944, 1947), Panouse (1946, 1947) have shown that eyestalk removal generally accelerates moulting in this species. In contrast, Scheer & Scheer (1954) and Carlisle (1953) demonstrated no moult inhibition in this species following eyestalk removal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , May 1985 , pp. 279 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adiyodi, K. G. & Adiyodi, R. G., 1970. Endocrine control of reproduction in decapod Crustacea. Biological Reviews, 45, 121–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aiken, D. E., 1969. Photoperiod, endocrinology and the crustacean moult cycle. Science, New York, 164, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazin, F., 1977. Mise en évidence des caractères cytologiques des glandes steroidogènes dan les glandes mandibulaires et les glandes Y du Crabe Carcinus maenas (L.) normal et épodoncule. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de V Académie des sciences, 282, 739—741.Google Scholar
Bliss, D. E., 1956. Neurosecretion and the control of growth in a decapod crustacean. In Bertil Hanstrom: Zoological Papers in Honour of his Sixty-fifth Birthday (ed. Wingstrand, K. G.), pp. 56–75. Lund, Sweden: Zoological Institute.Google Scholar
Carlisle, D. B., 1953. Moulting hormones in Leander (Crustacea Decapoda). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 32, 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, D. B. & Dohrn, P. F. R., 1953. Studies on Lysmata seticandata Risso. II. Experimental evidence for a growth- and moult-accelerating factor obtainable from eyestalks. Pubblicazioni della Statione zoologica di Napoli, 24, 69–83.Google Scholar
Carlisle, D. B. & Knowles, F., 1959. Endocrine Control in Crustaceans. 120 pp. Cambridge University Press. [Cambridge Monographs in Experimental Biology, no. 10.]Google Scholar
Drach, P. 1944. Étude préliminaire sur le cycle d'intermue et son conditionment hormonal chez Leander serratus (Pennant). Bulletin biologique de la France et de la Belgique, 78, 40–62.Google Scholar
Drach, P., 1947. Lumiere, glande du sinus et vitesse de parcours des intermues chez Leander serratus (Pennant). Compte rendu hebdomadaire des seances de I'Academie des sciences, 225, 1375–1378.Google Scholar
Drach, P. & Tchernigovtzeff, C, 1967. Sur la methode de détermination des stades d'intermue et son application générale aux crustaces. Vie et milieu (ser. A), 18, 595–616.Google Scholar
Fingerman, M., 1970. Perspectives in crustacean endocrinology. Scientia, 105, 422–444.Google Scholar
Fingerman, M. & Fingerman, S. W., 1974. The effects of limb removal on the rates of ecdysis of eyed and eyestalkless fiddler crabs, Uca pugilator. Zoologische Jahrbiicher (Abteilung Allgemeine Zoologie und Physiologie der Tiere), 78, 301—309.Google Scholar
Fingerman, S. W. & Fingerman, M., 1976. Effects of time of year and limb removal on rates of ecdysis of eyed and eyestalkless fiddler crabs, Uca pugilator. Marine Biology, 37, 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. A. & Bartell, C. K., 1975. Characterisation of the moult cycle and its hormonal control in Palaemonetes pugio (Decapoda, Caridea). General and Comparative Endocrinology, 25, 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabe, M., 1966. Neurosecretion. 872 pp. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Highnam, K. C. & Hill, L., 1969. The Comparative Endocrinology of the Invertebrates. 270 pp. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.Google Scholar
Holland, C. A. & Skinner, D. M., 1976. Interactions between moulting and regeneration in the land crab. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 150, 222–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, P. M., Bliss, D. E., Sheehan, S. W. & Boyer, J.R., 1979. Limb growth controlling factors in the crab Gecarcinus lateralis with special reference to the limb growth-inhibiting factor. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 39, 192—207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humbert, C, 1965. Étude expérimentale du rôle de l'organe X (pars distalis) dans les changements de couleur et la mue de la crevette Palaemon serratus. Travaux de I'institut scientifique chérifien (sér. zoologie), no. 32, 86 pp.Google Scholar
Kleinholz, L. H. & Keller, R., 1979. Endocrine regulations of Crustacea. In Hormones and Evolution, vol. 1 (ed. Barrington, E. J. W.), pp. 160–213: New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nakatani, I. & ōtsu, T., 1979. The effects of eyestalk, leg and uropod removal on the moulting and growth of young crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 157, 182—188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noulin, G. & Maissiat, J., 1974. Étude du role de l'organe Y et de l'effet de l'ecdysterone dans la régén´eration d'un appendice chez l'oniscoide Porcellio dilatatus. Journal of Insect Physiology, 20, 1963–1974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nouvel Van Rysselberge, L., 1937. Contribution a l'étude de la mue, de la croissance et de la régénération chez les Crustacés Natantia. Recueil de l'institut zoologique Torley-rousseau, 6 (2), 5–61.Google Scholar
Panouse, J. B., 1946. Recherches sur les phénomènes humoraux chez les Crustacés. L'adaptation chromatique et la croissance ovarienne chez la crevette Leander serratus. Annales de l'lnstitut océanographique, 23, 65–147.Google Scholar
Panouse, J.-B., 1947. La glande du sinus et la maturation des produits génitaux chez les crevettes. Bulletin biologique de la France et de la Belgique (supplement 33), 160–163.Google Scholar
Passano, M., 1960. Moulting and its control. In The Physiology of Crustacea, vol. 1 (ed. Waterman, T. H.), pp. 473–536. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pasteur-Humbert, C, 1962. Influence de l'ablation de l'organe X (pars distalis) sur la mue, chez le crevette Palaemon ( =Leander) serratus (Pennant). Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l'Academie des sciences, 254, 1160–1162.Google Scholar
Scheer, B. T., 1960. Aspects of the intermoult cycle in natantians. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 1, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheer, B. T. & Scheer, M. A. R., 1954. The hormonal control of metabolism in crustaceans. VII. Moulting and colour change in the prawn Leander serratus. Pubblicazioni della Stazione zoologica di Napoli, 25, 397–418.Google Scholar
Skinner, D. M. & Graham, D. E., 1972. Loss of limbs as a stimulus to ecdysis in Brachyura (true crabs). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 143, 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sochasky, J. B., 1973. Failure to accelerate moulting following eyestalk ablation in decapod crustaceans: a review of the literature. Technical Report. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, no. 431, 127 pp.Google Scholar
Stoffel, L. A. & Hubschman, J. H., 1974. Limb loss and the moult cycle in the freshwater shrimp, Palaemonetes kadiakensis. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 147, 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernet-Cornubert, G., 1961. Connaissances actuelles sur le déterminisme hormonal de la mue chez les Décapodes et étude de quelques phénomenes qui lui sont liés. Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générate, 99. Notes et revue, no. 5, p57–76.Google Scholar
Webster, S. G., 1982. Seasonal anecdysis and moulting synchrony in field populations of Palaemon elegans (Rathke). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 15, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, S. G., 1983. Effects of exogenous ecdysterone upon moulting, proecdysial development, and limb regeneration in the prawn Palaemon elegans. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 49, 459–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed