Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T04:49:18.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of China Clay on the Bottom Fauna of St Austell and Mevagissey Bays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

B. R. Howell
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch
R. G. J. Shelton
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch

Extract

This investigation of the bottom fauna of St Austell and Mevagissey Bays was prompted by the feeling among local fishermen that the increasing amount of china-clay waste being deposited in the bays was adversely affecting the local fishery. Physical pollution on a large scale can harm a fishery in a number of ways. The smothering of shellfish grounds is often to be expected, and where the pollutant contains a high proportion of very fine particles there is the danger that unstable clay banks will build up and constitute a purely mechanical hazard to trawling and potting. In this paper, however, we are concerned only with the effects of clay-waste pollution upon the bottom fauna, since it had been suggested that clay deposition might be impairing St Austell and Mevagissey Bays as feeding grounds for demersal fish.

Previous work on the biological effects of china-clay waste includes that of Miss N. Sproston (1945, unpublished), who examined the effects of suspended clay upon some species of pelagic fish. This worker was unable to demonstrate any recognizable effect of mica particles (present in clay waste) upon the gill tissues of fish taken from polluted water at Pentewan. However, Herbert et al. (1961) recorded cases of gill damage in Salmo trutta from china-clay-polluted reaches of the River Fal. These workers also showed that ‘the bottom fauna in the control streams was on average 3.3 times greater than in the polluted part of the Fal and 19 times greater than in the polluted part of the Par’.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J., 1899. On the fauna and bottom deposits near the thirty fathom line from the Eddystone to Start Point. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 5, pp. 365542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E., 1923. Animal communities of the level sea-bottom in the waters adjacent to Plymouth. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 13, pp. 164224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, D. W. M., Alabaster, J. S., Dart, M. C. & Lloyd, R., 1961. The effect of china-clay waste on trout streams. Int. J. Air. Wat. Pollut., Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 5674.Google ScholarPubMed
Herbert, D. W. M. & Merkens, J. C., 1961. The effect of suspended mineral solids on the survival of trout. Int. J. Air. Wat. Pollut., Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 4655.Google ScholarPubMed
Holme, N. A., 1953. The biomass of the bottom fauna in the English Channel off Plymouth. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 149.Google Scholar
Holme, N. A., 1961. The bottom fauna of the English Channel. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. Vol. 41, pp. 397461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holme, N. A., 1966. The bottom fauna of the English Channel. Part II. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 46, pp. 401–93.Google Scholar
Jones, N. S., 1950. Marine bottom communities. Biol. Rev., Vol. 25, pp. 283313.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. G. J., 1918. The sea bottom and its production of fish food. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn, No. 25, pp. 914.Google Scholar
Portmann, J. E., 1970. The effect of china clay on the sediments of St Austell and Mevagissey Bays. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 70, pp. 577591.Google Scholar
Steven, G. A., 1930. Bottom fauna and the food of fishes. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 16, pp. 677–98.Google Scholar
Tebble, N., 1966. British Bivalve Seashells. British Museum (Natural History), London. 212 pp.Google Scholar