Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:39:13.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ecology of the Tamar Estuary IV. The distribution of the fauna and flora on buoys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. Milne
A. Milne
Affiliation:
From the Plymouth Laboratory and Marischal College, Aberdeen University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Buoys differ from the intertidal area in that they are constantly immersed near the surface of the water and the slope and texture of their surface is constant. The horizontal and vertical distribution of the macrofauna and macroflora on a series of buoys stretching from the open sea up the Tamar estuary is given.

There are differences in estuarine penetration even among species belonging to the same genus. Distribution is likely to be affected by the time of laying the buoys and the period in the water. But the six buoys farthest from the sea were laid down and lifted at approximately the same time. For these, at least thirty species were available for colonization, but little more than half that number was found even on the most seaward; and the number decreased up-river.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1940 , pp. 69 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, W. B., Southgate, B. A., and Bassindale, R., 1935. Survey of the River Tees. Part II. The Estuary-chemical and biological. D.S.I.R. Water Pollution Research, Tech. Paper No. 5, H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Atkins, W. R. G., 1916. Some Recent Researches in Plant Physiology. London, 1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, S. M., 1910. On the causes of zoning of brown seaweeds on the seashore. II. New Phytologist, Vol. IX, pp. 54–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Børgesen, F., 1908. The algal-vegetation of the Faroese coasts with remarks on the phyto-geography. Botany of the Faroes, Part III, pp. 683–834.Google Scholar
Colman, J. S., 1933. The nature of the intertidal zonation of plants and animals. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, pp. 435–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, L. H. N. & Milne, A., 1938. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. II. Underwater illumination. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXII, pp. 509–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, L. H. N. & Milne, A. 1939. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. V. Under-water illumination. Revision of data for red light. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. Vol. XXIII, pp. 391–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, G. I., 1937. The fauna of certain estuaries in West England and South Wales with special reference to the Tanaidacea, Isopoda arid Amphipoda. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 647–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, C., 1927. Animal Ecology. New edition, 1935. London: Sidgwick and Jackson.Google Scholar
Fischer, E., 1928. Recherches de bionomie et d'océanographie littorales sur la Ranee et le littorale de la Manche. Ann. Inst. Océanogr. Paris. Tome I, V, fasc. 3, pp. 201–429.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1931. Sur la pénétration des diverses espéces marines sessiles dans les estuaires et sa limitation par l'eau douce. Ann. Inst. Océanogr. Tome X, fasc. 8. pp. 217–43.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1933. Nouvelles observations sur l'ordre d'euryhalinité des espéces littorales. Bull. Inst. Océanogr., No. 619, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E. 1934. Faune et flore de Saint-Servain en 1934. Bull. Lab. Saint-Servain., fasc. 13, pp. 22–30.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E. 1935. Histoire d'une mouliére. Observations sur une phase de déséquilibre faunique. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg., Tome LXIX, fasc. 2, pp. 153–77.Google Scholar
Flattely, F. W. & Walton, C. L., 1922. The Biology of the Seashore. London: Sidgwick and Jackson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, J. H., 1938. The fauna of fixed and floating structures in the Mersey estuary and Liverpool Bay. Proc. Trans. L'pool Biol. Soc. Vol. LI, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Hamel, G., 1923. Sur la limite de la végétation dans la Manche d'aprés les dragages effectués par le “Pourquoi-Pas?” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Tome 176, pp. 1568–70.Google Scholar
Hartley, P. H. T. & Spooner, G. M., 1938. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. I. Introduction. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXII, pp. 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntsman, A. G., 1918. The vertical distribution of certain intertidal animals. Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, Sect. IV, p. 53.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association. 1931. Plymouth Marine Fauna. 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Milne, A., 1938. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. III. Salinity and temperature conditions in the lower estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXII, pp. 529–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, L., 1931. A Handbook of the British Seaweeds. British Museum, London.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1929. Observations on Patella vulgata. Part III. Habitat and habits. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 277–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. H. 1930. Growth-inhibitive value of paints. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 373–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percival, E., 1929. A report on the fauna of the estuaries of the River Tamar and the River Lynher. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1936. Submarine illumination in relation to animal life. Rapp. Proc. Verb. Cons. Int. Expl. Mer., vol. CI, 2éme Partie, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Serventy, D. L., 1935. Observations on Gammarus zaddachi Sexton, an estuarine amphipod. Rev., Hydrob. Hydrog. Bd XXXII.Google Scholar