Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:49:36.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ecology of some parasitic copepods of gadoids and other fishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

N. G. Sproston  and
P. H. T. Hartley
N. G. Sproston
Affiliation:
From the Plymouth Laboratory
P. H. T. Hartley
Affiliation:
From the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The migratory habits of Gadus merlangus and G. pollachius are examined n i relation to the variations in the rate of infection of these fish with Lernaeocera branchialis. A sudden increase in infection in estuarine and inshore waters is found to coincide with the offshore migration of the main stock. The infected fish apparently linger behind and may live for some time in the old habitats after the arrival of the next recruitment. The offshore migrants are seldom infected, and it is probable that infection does not take place in water deeper than about 5 fathoms.

The possible immediate causes of this “lingering” phenomenon are examined, and two suggestions are made as to the nature of the physiological upset brought about by the presence of L. branchialis on these gadoids. Other factors influencing the distribution of the parasite are discussed.

The relative susceptibility of the different species of gadoids to infection with species of Lernaeocera is examined as far as the data allow.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , November 1941 , pp. 361 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dawes, B. 1940. Hexacotyle extensicauda n.sp., a monogenetic trematode from the gills of the tunny (Thunnus thynnus L.). Parasitology, Vol. XXXII, pp. 271–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E., 1931. In the Plymouth Marine Fauna, 2nd ed., p. 320.Google Scholar
Graham, M., 1934. Report on the North Sea cod. Fish. Invest., Ser. II, Vol. XIII, no. 4, London. Section 5: The life cycle of the cod in the North Sea, pp. 68–75.Google Scholar
Gurney, R., 1933. British Fresh-Water Copepoda, Vol. III. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Gurney, R., 1934 The development of certain parasitic copepoda of the families Caligidae and Clavellidae. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., pp. 177–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, P. H. T., 1940. The Saltash tuck-net fishery and the ecology of some estuarine fishes. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIV, pp. 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, E., 1870. Description d'une nouvelle espèce de Crustacé parasite de l'ordre des Lernéidiens de la famille des Lernéocériens, et du genre Lernée, Lernée du Gade-petit, Lernaea gadi minuti (nobis). Ann. Sci. Nat., Ser. 5, Zool., Vol. XIII, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Hesse, E. 1891. Description d'une nouvelle Lernée branchiale du Chaboisseau de Mer à longues épines (Cottus bubalis, nobis). Ann. Set. Nat., Sér. 7, Zool., Vol. XI, pp. 187–95. (As quoted by Wilson, C. B., 1917.)Google Scholar
Jungersen, H. F. E., 1911. On a new gymnoblastic hydroid (Ichthyocodium sarcotretis) epizoic on a new parasitic copepod, Sarcotretes scopeli, infesting Scopelus gladalis Rhdt. Vidensk. Medd. fra Dansk. naturh. Foren., Bd. LXIV, pp. 1–33Google Scholar
Keys, A. B., 1933. The mechanism of adaptation in the common eel and the general problem of osmotic regulation in fishes. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, Vol. CXII, pp. 184–99.Google Scholar
Leigh-Sharpe, W. H., 1935. Two copepods (Lernaeenicus) parasitic on Clupea. Parasitology, Vol. XXVII, pp. 270–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, A., 1913. Notes on the development of Mytilus edulis and Alcyonium digitatum in the Plymouth laboratory. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. IX, pp. 557–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, A., 1916. The Migrations of Fish. London.Google Scholar
Milne, A., 1938. The ecology of the Tamar Estuary. III. Salinity and temperature conditions in the Lower Estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXII, pp. 529–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panikkar, N. K. & Sproston, N. G., 1941. Osmotic relations of some metazoan parasites. Parasitology, Vol. XXXIII, pp. 214–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, E. K., 1939. Investigations upon the parasitic copepod Clavella uncinata (O. F. Müller) in Danish Waters. Vidensk. Medd. fra Dansk. naturh. Foren., Vol. CII, pp. 223–44.Google Scholar
Scott, A., 1901. Lepeophtheirus and Lernaea. L.M.B.C. Memoirs, Vol. VI.Google Scholar
Scott, A., 1907. Report for 1906: Lancashire Sea Fish. Lab., no. 15, p. 9.Google Scholar
Scott, A., 1929. The copepod parasites of Irish sea fishes: Report for 1928. Lancashire Sea Fish. Lab., pp. 81–119.Google Scholar
Scott, T., 1909. Some notes on fish parasites. In 26th Ann. Rep. Fish. Bd. Scotland, Part 3, pp. 73–92.Google Scholar
Scott, T. & Scott, A., 1913. The British parasitic Copepoda, Vol. 1. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Smith, H. W., 1930. The absorption and excretion of water and salts by marine teleosts. Amer. Journ. Physiol., Baltimore, Vol. XCIII, pp. 480–505.Google Scholar
Smith, H. W., 1932. Water regulation and its evolution in the fishes. Quart. Rev. Biol. Baltimore, Vol. VII, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Sproston, N. G., 1941. The developmental stages of Lernaeocera branchialis (L.) (unpublished).Google Scholar
Sproston, N. G. & Hartley, P. H. T., 1941. Observations on the bionomics and physiology of Trebius caudatus and Lernaeocera branchialis (Copepoda). Journ Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXV, pp. 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stekhoven, jr Schuurmans, J. H., 1936. Beobachtungen zur Morphologie und Physiologie der Lernaeocera branchialis L. und der Lernaeocera lusci Bassett-Smith (Crustacea parasitica). Z. Parasitenk., Bd. VIII, Heft 6, pp. 659–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stekhoven, jr, Schuurmans, J. H., & Punt, A. 1937. Weitere Beiträge zur Morphologie und Physiologie der Lernaeocera branchialis L. Z. Parasitenk., Bd. IX, Heft 5, pp. 648–68.Google Scholar
Thompson, I. C., 1893. Revised report on the Copepoda of Liverpool Bay. Proc. Liverpool Biol. Soc., Vol. VII, pp. 175–230.Google Scholar
Vanden Berghe, L., 1933. Observations sur le sang et le peristaltisme alternatif de Pintestine chez les Lemées. Acad. Roy. Belg. Cl. d. sci., Ser. 5, Vol. XIX, pp. 821–36.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. B., 1917. North American parasitic Copepods belonging to the Lernaeidae with a revision of the entire family. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., Vol. LIII, no. 2194, pp. 1–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar