Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:30:15.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do juvenile Amphiprion ocellaris (Pisces: Pomacentridae) recognize conspecifics by chemical or visual cues?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2003

Thea Marie Brolund ,
Lis Engdahl Nielsen  and
Michael Arvedlund
Thea Marie Brolund*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, The August Krogh Institute, Universitetsparken 13, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
Lis Engdahl Nielsen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, The August Krogh Institute, Universitetsparken 13, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
Michael Arvedlund
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, The August Krogh Institute, Universitetsparken 13, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
*
‡Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Juvenile anemonefish Amphiprion ocellaris were tested in two behavioural laboratory set-ups for their ability to visually or chemically recognize conspecifics. Individuals of two other species of anemonefish, A. clarkii and Dascyllus aruanus, were also used as test specimens for recognition. The results indicate that juvenile A. ocellaris recognize conspecifics visually rather than by olfaction. This is contrary to their finding mechanism of their host anemone. However, the results also indicate that the juvenile A. ocellaris are neither attracted nor deterred by the presence of conspecifics. This is contrary to the settling mechanisms of the damselfish D. aruanus and D. reticulatus, and of the temperate herring Clupea harengus. Hence the results emphasize the variation of sensory abilities and behaviours in fish larvae and juveniles. It is not an area prone for generalizations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 83 , Issue 5 , October 2003 , pp. 1127 - 1136
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, G.R., 1972. The anemonefishes, their classification and biology. New Jersey: Tropical Fish Hobbyist.Google Scholar
Arvedlund, M., Bundgaard, I. & Nielsen, L.E., 2000a. Host imprinting in anemonefishes (Pisces: Pomacentridae): does it dictate spawning site preferences? Environmental Biology of Fishes, 58, 203–213.Google Scholar
Arvedlund, M., Larsen, K. & Winsor, H., 2000b. The embryonic development of the olfactory system in Amphiprion melanopus (Perciformes: Pomacentridae) related to the host imprinting hypothesis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 80, 1103–1110.Google Scholar
Arvedlund, M., McCormick, M.I., Fautin, D.G. & Bildsoe, M., 1999. Host recognition and possible imprinting in the anemo-nefish Amphiprion melanopus (Pisces: Pomacentridae). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 188, 207–218.Google Scholar
Arvedlund, M. & Nielsen, L.E., 1996. Do the anemone fish Amphiprion ocellaris (Pisces: Pomacentridae) imprint themselves to their host sea anemone Heteractis magnifica (Anthozoa: Actinidae)? Ethology, 102, 197–211.Google Scholar
Bildsoe, M. & Sorensen, J.B., 1994. A method of modelling time dependent data: swimming in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) under threat of a predator. Behavioural Processes, 31, 75–96.Google Scholar
Dempsey, C.H., 1978. Chemical stimuli as a factor in feeding and intraspecific behaviour of herring larvae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 739–747.Google Scholar
Doherty, P.J. & Fowler, T., 1994. An empirical test of recruitment limitation in a coral reef fish. Science, New York, 263, 935–939.Google Scholar
Doherty, P.J. & Williams, D.McB., 1988. The replenishment of coral reef fish populations. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review, 26, 487–551.Google Scholar
Elliott, J.K., Elliott, J.M. & Mariscal, R.N., 1995. Host selection, location, and association behaviors of anemonefishes in field settlement experiments. Marine Biology, 122, 377–389.Google Scholar
Fautin, D.G., 1991. The anemonefish symbiosis: what is known and what is not. Symbiosis, 10, 23–46.Google Scholar
Fautin, D.G., 1992. Anemonefish recruitment: the roles of order and chance. Symbiosis, 14, 143–160.Google Scholar
Fautin, D.G. & Allen, G.R., 1992. Field guide to anemonefishes and their host sea anemones. Perth: Western Australian Museum.Google Scholar
Fricke, H.W., 1973. Ökologie und Sozialverhalten des Korallenbarsches Dascyllus trimaculatus (Pisces, Pomacentridae). Zeitung fu«r Tierpsychologie, 32, 225–256.Google Scholar
Fricke, H.W., 1974. Öko-Ethologie des monogamen Anemonefisches Amphiprion bicinctus (Freiwasseruntersuchung aus dem Roten Meer). Zeitung fu«r Tierpsychologie, 36, 429–512.Google Scholar
Holbrook, S.J. & Schmitt, R.J., 1996. Settlement patterns and process in a coral reef damselfish: in situ nocturnal observations using infrared video. Proceedings of the 8th International Coral Reef Symposium, 24 June, 1143–1143.Google Scholar
Juhl, T., 1992. Commercial breeding of anemonefishes. Sea Scope, 9, 1–4. Kingsford, M.J., 2001. Diel patterns of abundance of presettlement reef fishes and pelagic larvae on a coral reef. Marine Biology, 138, 853–867.Google Scholar
Konno, K., Qin, G. & Nakanishi, K., 1990. Synthesis of amphikuemin and analogs: a synomone that mediates partnerrecognition between anemonefish and sea anemones. Heterocycles, 30, 247–251.Google Scholar
Leis, J.M., 1991. The pelagic stage of reef fishes: the larval biology of coral reef fishes. In The ecology of fishes on coral reef (ed. PF Säle), pp. 183–230. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leis, J.M. & McCormick, M., 2002. The biology, behavior and ecology of the pelagic, larval stage of coral reef fishes. In Coral reef fishes, dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem (ed. P.F. Sale), pp. 171–199. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leis, J.M., Sweatman, H.P.A. & Reader, S.E., 1996. What the pelagic stages of coral reef fishes are doing out in blue water: daytime field observations of larval behavioural capabilities. Marine and Freshwater Reserves, 47, 401–411.Google Scholar
Mariscal, R.N., 1966. The symbiosis between tropical sea anemones and fishes: a review. In The Galdpagos: Proceedings of the Symposia of the Galdpagos International Scientific Project (ed. R.I. Bowman), pp. 157–171. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, K., 1989. Experimental analysis of the symbiosis between anemonefish and sea anemones. Ethology, 80, 19–46.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, K. & Hidaka, T., 1980. Amphiprion clarkii juvenile: innate protection against and chemical attraction by symbiotic sea anemones. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, Physiological and Biological Sciences, 56, 356–361.Google Scholar
Murata, M., Miyagawa-Kohshima, K., Nakanishi, K. & Naya, Y., 1986. Characterization of compounds that induce symbiosis between sea anemone and anemone fish. Science, New York, 234, 585–587.Google Scholar
Sale, P.F., 2002. Coral reef fishes, dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Selset, R. & Do«ving, K.B., 1980. Behavior of mature anadromous char (Salmo alpinus L.) towards odorants produced by smolts of their own population. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 108, 113–122.Google Scholar
Sweatman, H.P.A., 1983. Influence of conspecifics on choice of settlement sites by larvae of two pomacentrid fishes (Dascyllus aruanus and D. reticulatus) on coral reefs. Marine Biology, 75, 225–229.Google Scholar
Sweatman, H.P.A., 1985a. The timing of settlement by larval Dascyllus aruanus: some consequences for larval habitat selection. Proceedings of the 5th International Coral Reef Congress, 5, 367–371.Google Scholar
Sweatman, H.P.A., 1985b. The influence of adults of some coral reef fishes on larval recruitment. Ecological Monographs, 55, 469–485.Google Scholar
Sweatman, H.P.A., 1988. Field evidence that settling coral reef fish larvae detect resident fishes using dissolved chemical cues. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 124, 163–174.Google Scholar
Sweatman, H.P.A. & St. John, J., 1990. Effects of selective settlement and of aggression by residents on distribution of young recruits of two tropical damselfishes. Marine Biology, 105, 247–252.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. & Fairweather, P.G., 1989. Supply-side ecology and benthic marine assemblages. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 16–20.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H., 1996. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar