Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:01:46.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The distribution of larval sand eels (Ammodytidae) in the southern North Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. T. Macer
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft

Extract

The distributions of four species of larval Ammodytidae in the Southern North Sea are described. Two separate broods of Ammodytes lancea larvae were found, in spring and autumn. The spring larvae occurred in the areas of the Thames and Wash, and the autumn type mainly off the French and Dutch coasts.

A description of these larvae is given. Larvae of Gymnamtnodytes semisquamatus were found in the Southern Bight area and in several areas off the Humber. Few larvae of Ammodytes lanceolatus were taken: they occurred in the Southern Bight and Dowsing areas. A. marinus larvae were found in two areas off the Humber and in the Southern Bight. There is evidence for a spawning area some distance to the west of the Dover Strait.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowman, A., 1914. The spawning areas of sand-eels in the North Sea. Set. Invest., Fish. Bd Scot., 1913, No. 3.Google Scholar
Bridger, J. P., 1958. On efficiency tests made with a modified Gulf III high-speed tow-net. J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 23, pp. 357–65.Google Scholar
Cameron, J., 1959. The larval and post-larval stages of Gymnammodytes semisquamatus (Jourdain). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 38, pp. 1725.Google Scholar
Corbin, P. G., 1950 a. Ammodytes immaculatus, a new species of sand-eel found in European seas. Nature, Lond., Vol. 166, pp. 525–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, J., 1950 b. The occurrence of the smooth sand-eel Gymnammodytes semisquamatus (Jourdain), in the Plymouth area, with notes on G. cicerelus (Rafinesque), and G. capensis (Barnard). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 8389.Google Scholar
Corbin, P. G. & Vati, V., 1949. The post-larval sand-eels (Ammodytidae) of the Celtic Sea and Plymouth area. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 287313.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Meadows, P. S., 1962. The chemical basis of gregariousness in cirripedes. Proc. roy. Soc. B, Vol. 156, pp. 500–20.Google Scholar
Duncker, G. & Mohr, E., 1939. Revision der Ammodytidae. Mitt. zool. Mus. Berl., Bd. 24, pp. 131.Google Scholar
Ehrenbaum, E., 1904. Eier und Larven von Fischen der Deutschen Bucht. III. Fische mit festsitzenden Eiern. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., Abt. Helgoland, N.F. Bd. 6, pp. 127200.Google Scholar
Ehrenbaum, E., 1909. Eier und Larven von Fischen. Nord. Plankt., Bd. 1, Teil 2, pp. 217414.Google Scholar
Ehrenbaum, E. & Strodtmann, S., 1904. Eier und Jugenformen der Ostseefische. I. Bericht. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., Abt. Helgoland, N.F. Bd. 6, pp. 57126.Google Scholar
Einarsson, H., 1951. The post-larval stages of sand-eels (Ammodytidae) in Faroe, Iceland and W. Greenland waters. Acta nat. islandica, Vol. 1, No. 7.Google Scholar
Einarsson, H., 1955. On the post-larval stages of Ammodytes lancea Cuvier. Acta nat. islandica, Vol 2, No. 1.Google Scholar
Ford, E., 1920. The post-larval stages of Ammodytes species captured during the cruises of s.s. ‘Oithona’ in Plymouth waters in the year 1919. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 12, pp. 241–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehringer, J. W., 1952. An all-metal plankton sampler (model Gulf III). Spec. sci. Rep. U.S. Fish. Wildl. Serv., No. 88, pp. 712.Google Scholar
Henderson, G. T. D., 1954. Continuous plankton records; the young fish and fish eggs, 1932–39 and 1946–49. Hull Bull. mar. Ecol., Vol. 3, pp. 215–52.Google Scholar
Jensen, Ad. S., 1941. On subspecies and races of the lesser sand eel (Ammodytes lancea s. lat.). A contribution to the discussion of the species problem in fishes. Biol. Medd. Kbh., Bd 16, Nr. 9.Google Scholar
Kändler, R., 1941. Untersuchungen über Fortpflanzung, Wachstum und Variabilität der Arten des Sandaals in Ost- und Nordsee, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Saisonrassen von Ammodytes tobianus L. Kieler Meeresforsch., Bd. 5, pp. 45145.Google Scholar
Macer, C. T. Sand eels (Ammodytidae) in the south-western North Sea: their biology and fishery. Fish. Invest., Lond., Ser. 2 (in preparation).Google Scholar
Mcintosh, W. C., 1889. On the pelagic fauna of the Bay of St Andrews during the months of 1888. Part 1. Rep. Fish. Bd Scot., 1888, pp. 259310.Google Scholar
Mcintosh, W. C., 1891. Further observations on the life-histories and development of food and other fishes. Rep. Fish. Bd Scot., 1890, pp. 317–42.Google Scholar
Mcintosh, W. C. & Prince, E. E., 1890. On the development and life-histories of the teleostean food- and other fishes. Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 35, pp. 665944.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (in preparation). Studies with the Woodhead sea-bed drifter in the Southern North Sea. Laboratory Leaflet, No. 6.Google Scholar
Raiit, D. S., 1934. A preliminary account of the sandeels of Scottish waters. J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 9, pp. 365–72.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. C., 1949 a. Notes on the occurrence of fish eggs and larvae in the Southern Bight of the North Sea during the winter of 1946–47. Ann. biol., Copenhague, Vol. 4, pp. 90–4.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. C., 1949 b. Notes on the occurrence of fish eggs and larvae in the Southern Bight of the North Sea during the winter of 1947–48. Ann. biol., Copenhague, Vol. 5, pp. 90–7.Google Scholar
Thomopoulos, A., 1954. Sur l'œuf d'équille (Ammodytes tobianus L.). Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., T. 79, pp. 112–20.Google Scholar
Wisby, W. J. & Hasler, A. D., 1954. Effect of olfactory occlusion on migrating silver salmon (O. kisutch). J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., Vol. 11, pp. 472–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar