Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:41:36.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution, abundance, population structure and meat yield of the ocean quahog, Arctica islandica, in icelandic waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Gudrún G. Thórarinsdóttir  and
Sólmundur T. Einarsson
Gudrún G. Thórarinsdóttir
Affiliation:
Marine Research Institute, PO Box 1390, Skúlagata 4, 121 Reykjavík, Iceland
Sólmundur T. Einarsson
Affiliation:
Marine Research Institute, PO Box 1390, Skúlagata 4, 121 Reykjavík, Iceland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A hydraulic dredge survey was conducted during January – June 1994 in north-west, north and east Iceland, to provide a first assessment of ocean quahog, Arctica islandica (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) resources in these areas. Ocean quahog was found in significant concentrations and high density. The combined high-density areas were 91.7 km2 with a minimum biomass (live weight) of 304.80 tonnes. Information on population structure and meat yield were also provided. The population in the areas was characterized by unimodal size distributions comprised of mostly larger-sized individuals. Most quahogs were between 70 and 90 mm with no individuals <17 mm which might be due to the selectivity of the dredge or because of poor recruitment in the population. Little difference was observed when comparing the mean shell length for the quahogs from the three areas. The mean shell length in the north-west area was 75.4 mm and 74.8 mm in the north and east areas. The shell length frequency distribution for the north-west area was different in shape from the two others which were not significantly different from each other. Mean quahog meat yields in the areas were from 30.1 to 33%. The meat yield was highest in the 50.55 mm size class in all areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 76 , Issue 4 , November 1996 , pp. 1107 - 1114
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon., , 1993. Report of the 15th Northeast Regional Stock Assessment Workshop (15th SAW), 1993. Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC) Consensus Summary of Assessments. Report. National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA), 1–33.Google Scholar
Anon., , 1995. Report of the 19th Northeast Regional Stock Assessment Workshop (19th SAW), 1995. Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC) Consensus Summary of Assessments. Report. National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA), 177–219.Google Scholar
Bakal, A., Rathjen, W.F. & Mendelsohn, J., 1978. Ocean quahog takes supply spotlight as surf clam dwindles. Food Product Development, 12, 70–78.Google Scholar
Chaisson, D.R. & Rowell, T.W., 1985. Distribution, abundance, population structure, and meat yield of the ocean quahaug (Arctica islandica) and Stimpson's surf clam (Spisula polynyma) on the Scotian Shelf and Georges bank. Canadian Industry Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 155, p. 134.Google Scholar
Eiríksson, H., 1988. Um stofnsaerd og veidimöguleika á kúfskel í Breidafirdi, Faxaflóa og vid SA-land. Ægir, 2, 58–68. [In Icelandic]Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, L., 1980. Íslenskir sjávarhættir, vol 1, pp. 141–160, Reykjavík: Bókaútgáfa Menningarsjóds. [In Icelandic]Google Scholar
Lindgren, B.W., 1993. Statistical theory, 4th ed. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Medcof, J.C. & Caddy, J.F., 1971. Underwater observations on the performance of clam dredges of three types. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Gear and Behaviour Committee (CM Papers and Reports), CM 1971/B:10, 5 pp.Google Scholar
Merill, A.S. & Ropes, J.W., 1969. The general distribution of the surf clam and ocean quahog. Proceedings of the National Shellfisheries Association, 59, 40–5.Google Scholar
Murawski, S.A., Ropes, J.W. & Serchuk, F.M., 1982. Growth of the ocean quahaug, Arctica islandica, in the Middle Atlantic Bight. Fishery Bulletin, NOAA, 80, 21–34.Google Scholar
Murawski, S.A., Ropes, J.W. & Serchuk, F.M., 1983. An assessment of the ocean quahog, Arctica islandica, resource and fishery in FCZ waters off the north-eastern USA, autumn 1983. Marine Biological Laboratories, Woods Hole, Reference Document no. 83–25, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Murawski, S.A. & Serchuk, F.M., 1989. Mechanized shellfish harvesting and its management: the offshore clam fishery of the eastern United States. In Marine invertebrate fisheries: their assessment and management (ed. J.F., Caddy), pp. 479–506. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Ricker, W.E., 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 191, 1–382.Google Scholar
Rowell, T.W. & Chaisson, D.R., 1983. Distribution and abundance of the ocean quahaug (Arctica islandica) and Stimpson's surf clam (Spisula polynyma) resource on the Scotian Shelf. Canadian Industry Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 142, 1–75.Google Scholar