Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:16:41.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digenetic trematodes in cephalopods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Robin M. Overstreet  and
F. G. Hochberg
Robin M. Overstreet
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564
F. G. Hochberg
Affiliation:
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California 93105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Cephalopod molluscs have attracted little attention as potential hosts for digenetic trematodes. Though none appears to serve as a first intermediate host, many do act as second intermediate, paratenic, or final hosts. Hence, they probably play a more important role in the life history and dissemination of Digenea in the marine environment than is generally recognized.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , November 1975 , pp. 893 - 910
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, F. R., 1966. A new species of adult Allocreadidae from Octopus maorum Hutton. Record of the Canterbury Museum, 8, 81–5.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E., 1847. Recherches sur l'organization des vers. Annales des sciences naturelles, Zoologie, Ser. 3, 8, 271–341.Google Scholar
Braun, M. G. C. C., 1889–1893. Vermes. la. Mionelminthes, Trichoplax und Trematodes. In: Klassen und Ordnungen des Thier-Reichs wissenschaftlich dargestellt in Wort und Bild, ed. Bronn, H. G., vol. 4, 209–925. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, A. Jr, 1967. Some trematodes from marine fishes in the waters of Rhodes. Arbok for Universitetet i Bergen Matematisk-naturvitenskapelig serie, for 1966, 10, 1–13.Google Scholar
Buttel-Reepen, H. B. Von, 1902. Zur kenntnis der Gruppe des Distomum clavatum, insbesondere des D. ampullaceum und des D. siemersi. Zoologischer Jahresbericht. Zoologische Station zu Neapel, 17, 165–202.Google Scholar
Carus, J. V., 1885. Vermes. In:Prodromus faunae Mediterraneae [etc.] vol. 1, 112–282. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. R., 1966. A review of the systematics and ecology of oceanic squids. Advances in Marine Biology, 4, 91–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbold, T. S., 1860. Synopsis of the Distomidae. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, Ser. 17, 5, 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuvier, G., 1829. Memoire sur un ver parasite d'un nouveau genre (Hectocotylus octopodis). Annales des sciences naturelles, 18, 147–56.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G., 1830a. Ueber einen Schmarotzerwurm einer neuen Gattung (Hectocotylus octopodis). Notizen und Tagsberichte aus dem Gebiete der Natur- und Heilkunde, 27, 6–10.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G., 1830 b. On parasitic animals, and on a new genus of that family. Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal, 22, 101–4.Google Scholar
Dawes, B., 1946. The Trematoda: with special reference to British and other European forms. 644 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delle, Chiaje S., 1822 [i.e., 1830 ?]. Memorie sulla storia e notomia degli animali senza vertebre del regno di Napoli, 34–109. [i.e., 114 pis.] Napoli: Fratelli Fernandes.Google Scholar
Delle, Chiaje S., 1825 [i.e., 1828 ?] Nota sul mollusco dell'Argonauta argo, su una nuova specie di epizoo che vi ospita, e sulla Medusa velella. In: Memorie sulla storia e notomia degli animali senza vertebre del regno di Napoli, vol. 2, 219–45. Napoli: Fratelli Fernandes.Google Scholar
Delle, Chiaje S., 1829 [i.e., 1831 ?]. Su' cefalopedi [sic] In: Memorie sulla storia e notomia degli animali senza vertebre del regno di Napoli, vol. 4, 38–116, 151–2. Napoli: Fratelli Fernandes.Google Scholar
Delle, Chiaje S., 1841. Descrizione e notomia degli animali invertebrati del la Sicilia citeriore osservati vivi regli anni 1822–30, vol. 3, 1–142. Napoli: Stabilimento Tipografico di C. Batelli.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditlevsen, H., 1917. Trematoder. Meddelelser om Grenland, 23, 1143–52.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1923 a. Remarques sur le cycle evolutif des Hémiurides. Annales de parasitologie humaine et comparée, 1, 345–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1923 b. Énumération des cestodes du plancton et des invertebres marins. Annales de parasitologie humaine et comparee, 1, 363–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1942. Études critiques sur les Tétrarhynques du Muséum de Paris. Archives du Muséum d'histoire naturelle Paris, Ser. 6, 19, 1–466.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1955. Metacercaire progénétique de Derogenes (Trematoda, Hemiuroidea) chez un copepode parasite de poisson. Vie et milieu, 5 (for 1954), 565–8.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1958. Copépodes, isopodes et helminthes parasites de cephalopodes de la Méditerranée et de l'Atlantique Europeen. Faune marine des Pyrenées-orientales, 1, 61–72.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1960 a. Distomes des chaetognathes. Bulletin de l'Institut des pêches maritimes du Maroc, 4, 1–27.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1960 b. Critique des récentes innovations apportées à la classification des Accacoeliidae (Trematoda, Digenea). Observations sur des metacercaires de cette famille. Annales de parasitologie humaine et comparée, 35, 648–71.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1963. Liste des coelentérés marins, palaearctiques et indiens ou ont eté trouves des trématodes digénetiques. Bulletin de l'Institut des pêches maritimes du Maroc, 9–10, 33–57.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1971. Larves de Didymozooidae chez un cephalopode. In: Proceedings of the second international congress of parasitology, Sept. 6–12, 1970, Washington, D.C., 4, 47–8. [Abstract]Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1973. Parasitologia mauritanica. Digénétiques de Téléostéens, 1rc note. Du genre Stephanochasmus A. Looss, 1900 (Trematoda, Digenea). Bulletin de I'lnsthut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire, 34, Sér. 4, 809–27.Google Scholar
Doss, M. A., 1964. Index-catalogue of medical and veterinary zoology. Subjects: Trematoda and trematode diseases. Part 3: Supergenera and Genera D, pp. 359–595. Washington, D.C.: U S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1845. Histoire Naturelle des Helminthes ou Vers Intestinaux. 645 pp. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields, W. C. & Gauley, V. A., 1972. A report on cephalopods collected by Stanford Oceanographic Expedition 20 to the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean September to November, 1968. Veliger, 15, 113–18.Google Scholar
Fischthal, J. H. & Kuntz, R. E., 1964. Digenetic trematodes of fishes from Palawan Island, Philippines. IV. Some immature didymozoidae, a bucephalid; a new hemiuroid genus and subfamily. Journal of Parasitology, 50, 253–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischthal, J. H. & Thomas, J. D., 1968. Digenetic trematodes of marine fishes from Ghana; families Acanthocolpidae, Bucephalidae, Didymozoidae. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 35, 237–47.Google Scholar
Gros, G., 1847. De la génération spontanée ou primitive en général et en particulier des helminthes. Bulletin de la Société Imperiale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 20, 517–40.Google Scholar
Hall, M. C., 1929. Arthropods as intermediate hosts of helminths. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 81, 1–77.Google Scholar
Hewitt, G. C. & Hine, P. M., 1972. Checklist of parasites of New Zealand fishes and of their hosts. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 6, 69–114 (Fisheries Research Publication No. 181).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, F. G., 1969. Cephalopods as intermediate hosts for larval didymozoids. In: American Society of Parasitologists. Annual Meeting, Nov. 3–7, 1969, Washington, D.C., Program and Abstracts, p. 55. [Abstract]Google Scholar
Hutton, R. F., 1954. Metacercaria owreae n. sp., an unusual trematode larva from Florida current chaetognaths. Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean, 4, 104–9.Google Scholar
Johnstone, J., 1907. Internal parasites and diseased conditions of fishes. Procéedings and Transactions of the Liverpool Biological Society, 21, 270–303.Google Scholar
Joyeux, C. & Baer, J. G., 1936. Cestodes. Faune de France, 30, 1–613.Google Scholar
Kolliker, A. Von, 1845. Some observations upon the structure of two new species of Hectocotyle parasitic upon Tremoctopus violaceus, Delle Chiaje, and Argonauta Argo, L.; with an exposition of the hypothesis that these Hectocotyle are the males of the Cephalopoda upon which they are found. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 1, 236–8.Google Scholar
Kolliker, A. Von, 1846. Some observations upon the structure of two new species of Hectocotyle, parasitic upon Tremoctopus violaceus, D. Ch., and Argonauta Argo, Linn.; with an exposition of the hypothesis that these Hectocotylae are the males of the Cephalopoda upon which they are found. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 20, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolliker, A. Von, 1849 a. Zwei neue Distomen, Distoma pelagiae nov. sp. und D. okenii nov. sp. Berichte von der Königlichen Zootomischen Anstalt zu Wurzburg, 2, 53–8.Google Scholar
Kolliker, A. Von, 1849 b. Ueber Dicyema paradoxum, den Schmarotzer der Venenanhange der Cephalopoden. Berichte von der Koniglichen Zootomischen Anstalt zu Wurzburg, 2, 59–66.Google Scholar
Kolliker, A. Von, 1849 c. Hectocotylus argonautae D. Ch. und Hectocotylus tremoctopodis Kö11., die Männchen von Argonauta argo und Tremoctopus violaceus D. Ch. Berichte von der Koniglichen Zootomischen Anstalt zu Würzburg, 2, 67–89.Google Scholar
Kulachkova, V. G., 1970. [Helminths of Sagitta elegans in the White Sea.] In: Voprosy morskoi parazitologii [All-Union symposium (isf) on parasites and diseases of marine animals, Sevastopol, 1970]. Kiev: Izdat.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1908. Fish trematodes of the Northumberland coast. Fisheries Officer's Reports, Northumberland Sea Fisheries Committee, 1907, 11–67.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1917. Some parasites of Sagitta bipunctata. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 11, 201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuckart, R. & Pagenstecher, A., 1858. Untersuchungen iiber niedere Séethiere. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und Wissenschaftliche Median, 1858, 558–613.Google Scholar
Levinsen, G. M. R., 1881. Bidrag til Kundskab om Gronlands Trematodfauna. Oversigt over det K. Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger, 1, 52–84.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1761. Fauna Suecica sistens animalia Sueciae regni: mammalia, aves, amphibia, pisces, insecta, vermes. Distributa per classes et ordines, genera et species [etc.]. Editio altera, auctior. 578 pp. Stockholmiae.Google Scholar
Lloyd, L. C., 1938. Some digenetic trematodes from Puget Sound fish. Journal of Parasitology, 24, 103–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Looss, A., 1902. Ueber die Gattung Orophocotyle n. g. (Zur Kenntnis der Trematodenfauna des Triester Hafens. 1). Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene (Jena), 31, 637–44.Google Scholar
Madhavi, R., 1968. A didymozoid metacercaria from the copepod, Paracalanus aculeatus Giesbrecht, from Bay of Bengal. Journal of Parasitology, 54, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manter, H. W., 1966. Parasites of fishes as biological indicators of recent and ancient conditions. In: Host-parasite relationships. Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual biology colloquium, April 23–24, 1965, ed. McCauley, J. E., 59–71. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1957. Plymouth Marine Fauna, 3rd ed, 457 pp.Google Scholar
Martin, W. E., 1939. Studies on the trematodes of Woods Hole. II. The life cycle of Stephanostomum tenue (Linton). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 77, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monticelli, F. S., 1892. Studi sui trematodi endoparassiti, Monostomum cymbium Diesing. Contribuzione allo studio dei monostomidi. Memorie della R. Accademia delle scienze di Torino, Serie 2, 42, 683–727.Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S., 1893. Studii sui trematodi endoparassiti: Primo contributo di osservazioni sui distomidi. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Supplement (Jena), 3, 1–229.Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S., 1914. Ricerche sulla Cercaria setifera di Joh. Müller. Atti della R. Accademia delle scienze Fisiche e Matematiche (Napoli), Serie 2, 15, 1–48.Google Scholar
Moulinié, J. J., 1856. De la reproduction chez les trematodes endoparasites. Mémoires de I'Institut Genevois, 3, 7–278.Google Scholar
Müller, H., 1853 a. Ueber das Mannchen von Argonauta Argo und die Hectocotylen. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 4, 1–35.Google Scholar
Müller, H., 1853 b. Upon the male of Argonauta Argo and the Hectocotyli. In: Scientific Memoirs, Selected from the Transactions of Foreign Academies of Science, and from Foreign Journals, pp. 52–91. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Nasir, P. & Diaz, M. T., 1971. A revision of genus Lecithochirium Luehe, 1901, and redescription of L. monticellii (Linton, 1898) Skrjabin and Guschanskaja, 1955. Rivista di Parassitologia, 32, 27–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Nicoll, W. & Small, W., 1909. Notes on larval trematodes. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 8, 3, 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, V. M., 1965. [On the development cycle of trematodes belonging to the family Didymozoidae (Monticelli, 1888) Poche, 1907. Zoologicheskiĭ zhurnal, 44, 1317–27. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, V. M., 1968. [On finding Accacoeliidae larvae in the fishes and invertebrates.] Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR. Institut Biologii Yuzhnyka Morei im. A. O. Kovalevskogo, Biologiya Morya, Kiev, 14, 83–9.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, V. M., 1970. [Didymozoidae metacercaria in Red Sea fishes.] Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR. Institut Biologii Yuzhnyka Morei im. A. O. Kovalevskogo, Biologiya Morya, Kiev, 20, 113–29. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Odhner, T., 1905. Die Trematoden des arktischen Gebietes. Fauna arctica, 4, 291–372.Google Scholar
Packard, A., 1972. Cephalopods and fish: the limits of convergence. Biological Reviews, 47, 241–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palombi, A., 1942. Il ciclo biologico di Ptychogonimus megastoma (Rud.). Osservazioni sulla morfologia e fisiologia delle forme larvali e considerazioni filogenetiche. Rivista di Parassitologia, 6, 117–72.Google Scholar
Parona, C., 1894. L'elmintologia italiana da suoi primi tempi all'anno 1890. Storia, sistematica, corologia e bibliografia. Atti della R. Università di Genova, 13, 1–733.Google Scholar
Parona, C., 1912. L'elmintologia italiana da'suoi primi tempi all'anno 1910. Bibliografia, sistematica, corologia, storia. Vol. 2: Sistematica, corologia, storia, 540 pp. Novara.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1928. Les parasites des Mollusques et les Mollusques parasites. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 53, 158–89.Google Scholar
Poirier, J., 1885. Contribution à l'historie des trematodes. Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générate. Serie 2, 3, 465–624.Google Scholar
Prudhoe, S. & Bray, R. A., 1973. Digenetic trematodes from fishes. B.A.N.Z. Antarctic Research Expedition Reports, Series B, 8, Part 10, 195–225.Google Scholar
Rebecq, J., 1965. Considerations sur la place des trematodes dans le zooplancton marin. Annales de la Faculte des sciences de Marseille, 38, 61–84.Google Scholar
Reimer, L. W., 1974. The position of cephalopods in life cycles of helminths of marine fishes. In: Proceedings of third international congress of parasitology, 3, 1727–8. Vienna: Facta Publication. [Abstract]Google Scholar
Reimer, L. W., Gerger, C., Hener, B., Lainka, H., Rosenthal, I. & Scharnweber, I., 1971. [On the distribution of larval helminths in planktonic animals of the North Sea.] Parazitologiya (Leningrad), 5, 542–50. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Short, R. B. & Powell, E. C., 1968. Mature digenetic trematodes from New Zealand octopuses. Journal of Parasitology, 54, 757–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, J., 1907. Preliminary report on the trematodes of Canadian marine fishes. Further Contributions to Canadian Biology, 1902–1905, 91–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stunkard, H. W., 1961. Cercaria dipterocerca Miller and Northup, 1926 and Stephanostomum dentatum (Linton, 1900) Manter, 1931. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 120, 221–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uspenskaja, A. V., 1963. [Parasitic fauna of benthic crustaceans from the Barents Sea.] Akademii Nauk SSSR (Moscow, Leningrad), 128 pp. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Vaullegeard, A., 1896. Notices helminthologiques. Bulletin de la Societe linne'enne de Normondie, Serie 4, 10, 50–60.Google Scholar
Wagener, C. R., 1860, Über Distoma appendiculatum, Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, 26, 165–94.Google Scholar
Wirz, K., 1958. Céphalopodes. Faune marine des Pyrénées-orientates, 1, 1–59.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1942. Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 38. Larval trematodes of fishes. Japanese Journal of Medical Sciences, 6, 131–60.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1970. Digenetic trematodes of Hawaiian fishes. 436 pp. Tokyo: Keigaku Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1971. Synopsis of digenetic trematodes of vertebrates. 1800 pp. Tokyo: Keigaku Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Zaika, V. E. & Kolesnikov, A. N., 1967. [On mass infection of Sagitta elegans arctica Aurivillus by sexually mature trematodes.] Zoologicheskiĭ zhurnal, 46, 1121–4. [In Russian]Google Scholar