Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:10:58.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The development of the female gamete in the endosymbiont-bearing bivalve Loripes lucinalis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. A. Johnson
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, URA CNRS D1513, Institut d'Etudes Marines, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, 29287 Brest Cedex, France
M. Le Pennec
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, URA CNRS D1513, Institut d'Etudes Marines, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, 29287 Brest Cedex, France

Extract

The development of the female gonad in Loripes lucinalis (Lamarck) from Brest Harbour (Brittany, France) was examined over a one-year period. Throughout the year, several size classes of eggs were observed, and spawning was seen to occur twice. A major spawning occurred in May leaving the gonad completely empty in June. A minor spawning is also thought to have occurred between the November and December sampling periods. These spawnings do not seem to correlate with the classical environmental factors often associated with gametogenesis and spawning, namely temperature and chlorophyll a levels. The energy for gametogenesis seems to be obtained from the transfer of metabolites to the oocytes via specialized follicle cells. These metabolites are believed to be of heterosynthetic origin. An inverse relationship exists between the thickness of the follicle cell epithelium and the occupancy level of the gametes. During periods of gonadal proliferation, these cells represent the nutritive cells of the gonad, but during periods of non-proliferation they make up a somatic tissue used for metabolite storage until conditions are adequate for gonadal development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayne, B.L. & Newell, R.C., 1983. Physiological energetics of marine molluscs. In The Mollusca, vol. 4 (ed. A.S.M., Saleuddin and K.M., Wilbur), pp. 407515. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dehn, P.F., 1982. The effect of food and temperature on reproduction in Luidia dathrata (Asteroidea). In Echinoderms: Proceedings of the International Conference, Tampa Bay (ed. J.M., Lawrence), pp. 457463. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Eckelbarger, K.J. & Grassle, J.P., 1982. infrastructure of the ovary and oogenesis in the polychaete Capitella jonesi (Hartman, 1959). Journal of Morphology, 171, 305320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabe, M., 1968. Techniques histologiques. Paris-Ve: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Giese, A.C. & Kanatani, H., 1987. Maturation and spawning. In Reproduction of marine invertebrates, vol. IX. General aspects: seeking unity in diversity (ed. A.C., Gieseet al.), pp. 251329. California: Blackwell Scientific Publications and Boxwood Press.Google Scholar
Giorgi, G., 1980. Coated vesicles in the oocyte. In Coated vesicles (ed. C.D., Ockleford and A., Whyte), pp. 135177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herry, A., Diouris, M. & Le Pennec, M., 1989. Chemoautotrophic symbionts and translocation of fixed carbon from bacteria to host tissues in the littoral bivalve Loripes lucinalis (Lucinidae). Marine Biology, 101, 305312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herry, A., Diouris, M. & Le Pennec, M., 1990. Transfert du carbone des bactéries chimoautotrophes intra-branchiales à différents tissus de l'hôte chez Loripes lucinalis (Lucinidae). Abstracts from the 8ème Congrès National, Brest. Société Française de Malacologie.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.A., 1993. Estimation de la contribution des bactéries endosymbiotiques chimioautotrophes dans l'apport de carbone chez le mollusque bivalve Loripes lucinalis par le calcul du rapport 13C/12 C. Abstracts from the 9ème Congrès National, La Rochelle. Société Française de Malacologie.Google Scholar
Kraeuter, J.N., Castagna, M. & Dessel, R. Van, 1982. Egg size and larval survival of Mercenaria mercenaria (L.) and Argopecten irradians (Lamarck). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 56, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, B.S., 1976. The biology, ecology and functional aspects of the organs of feeding and digestion of the SE Asian mangrove bivalve, Enigmonia aenigmatica (Mollusca: Anomiacea). Journal of Zoology, 179, 437466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R.I.E., Hilbish, T.J., Koehn, R.K. & Newell, C.J., 1982. Temporal variation in the reproductive cycle of Mytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia, Mytilidae) from localities on the east coast of the United States. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 162, 299310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimitz, Sister M.A. & Giese, A.C., 1964. Histochemical changes correlated with reproductive activity and nutrition in the chiton Katharina tunicata. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 105, 481495.Google Scholar
Pearse, J.S., Pearse, V.B. & Davis, K.K., 1986. Photoperiodic regulation of gametogenesis and growth in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 237, 107118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sastry, A.N., 1983. Ecological aspects of reproduction. In The biology of Crustacea, vol. 8 (ed. F.J., Vernberg and W.B., Vernberg), pp. 179270. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, P.C., 1987. Endogenous control of gametogenesis. In Reproduction of marine invertebrates, vol. IX. General aspects: seeking unity in diversity (ed. A.C., Gieseet al.), pp. 179249. California: Blackwell Scientific Publications and Boxwood Press.Google Scholar
Sumikawa, S. & Ishimatsu, S., 1984. Phasic activity in the digestive diverticula of the lamellibranch Cyclina sinensis. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries, 50, 19992004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, P.A.W.J. De & Berghuis, E.M., 1978. Laboratory experiments on the spawning of Macoma balthica: its implication for production research. In Physiology and behaviour of marine organisms (ed. D.S., McLusky and A.J., Berry), pp. 375384. Oxford: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wourms, J.P., 1987. Oogenesis. In Reproduction of marine invertebrates, vol. IX. General aspects: seeking unity in diversity (ed. A.C., Gieseet al.), pp. 49178. California: Blackwell Scientifc Publications and Boxwood Press.Google Scholar