Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:29:50.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Development, Morphology and Budding of the Ascidian Diazona

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

N. J. Berrill
Affiliation:
From the Plymouth Laboratory and McGill University, Montreal

Extract

Diazona is represented in European waters only by Diazona violacea Savigny. It is a compound ascidian forming massive colonies of spectacular size and appearance. In many ways it is the most interesting of all ascidians, for in its adult structure it straddles two commonly accepted orders and in itself is a strong argument against such a division; it is the only oviparous and small egged compound ascidian, two features undoubtedly primitive; and its manner of budding is the simplest and probably is the basic type for the group as a whole. Only fragmentary descriptions of the morphology and reproduction exist, and a more or less complete account of the various stages of the life cycle may be of some value. The family Diazonidae includes, in addition to Diazona itself, the genera Tylobranchion of subantarctic regions, and Rhopalea of Mediterranean and northern waters. In its entirety Diazona appears to link with such divergent forms as Ciona on the one hand and Archidistoma on the other. The fact that Diazona is obtained by dredging in relatively swift offshore waters and lives poorly in an aquarium probably accounts for the existing unsatisfactory state of knowledge of most of its phases. Most of what is known concerns asexual reproduction; and attention has been given, at various times, primarily to the process of regeneration, rather than bud formation, for example by Della Valle (1884), Caullery (1914), Oka (1906) under the name Aphanobranchion, and by Salfi (1926).

The material of the present account was collected at various times in the Plymouth area from the Mewstone and Eddystone grounds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brien, P., 1925. Contribution à l'étude de la blastogénèse des Tuniciers. Bourgeonnement chez Aplidium zostericola (Giard). Arch. Biol., T. XXXV, pp. 155205.Google Scholar
Caullery, M., 1914. Sur Diazona geayi n.sp., Ascidie nouvelle de la Guyane, et sur la régénération et le bourgeonnement de Diazona. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, T. XXXIX, pp. 204–11.Google Scholar
Della Valle, A., 1884. Sul ringiovanimento delle colonie di Diazona violacea Sav. Rend. Accad. Sc. Fis. Mat. Napoli, Vol. XXIII, pp. 23–6.Google Scholar
Garstang, W., 1891. Report on the Tunicata of Plymouth. Part I. Clavelinidae, Perophoridae, Diazonidae. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. II, pp. 4767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oka, A., 1906. Aphanibranchion, eine neue Synascidiengattung aus Japan. Annot. zool. Jap., Vol. V, pp. 253–65.Google Scholar
Salfi, M., 1925. Sul ringiovanimento della Rhopaloea neapolitana Phil. Boll. Soc. Nat. Napoli, Vol. XXXVII, pp. 85–9.Google Scholar
Salfi, M., 1926. Richerche sul ringiovanimento e sulla blastogenesi in Diazona violacea Sav. Pubbl. Staz. Zool. Napoli, Vol. VII, pp. 335–66.Google Scholar
Spek, J., 1927. Über die Winterknospenentwicklung, Regeneration und Reduktion bei Clavelina lepadiformis und die Bedeutung besonderer “Omnipotenter” Zellelemente für diese Vorgänge. Arch. Entw. Mech., Bd. CXI, pp. 119–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar