Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:14:12.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determining body condition of nesting loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in the South-west Indian Ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2020

C. R. Nolte Open the ORCID record for C. R. Nolte [Opens in a new window] ,
R. Nel  and
M. C. Pfaff
C. R. Nolte*
Affiliation:
Institute for Coastal and Marine Research and Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, Summerstrand South Campus, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
R. Nel
Affiliation:
Institute for Coastal and Marine Research and Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, Summerstrand South Campus, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
M. C. Pfaff
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Affairs, Oceans and Coasts, Cape Town, South Africa Department of Biological Sciences, MARE Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
*
Author for correspondence: C. R. Nolte, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sea turtles are long-lived migratory species that are sensitive to anthropogenic impacts. Their condition reflects that of marine ecosystems and can serve as an indicator for environmental monitoring. However, evaluating body condition parameters, as a proxy for health, is challenging and often overlooked. The purpose of this study was to validate a straightforward method for assessing the body condition of nesting loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta), and to investigate whether body condition was correlated with epibiont loading. To achieve this, 60 nesting loggerhead sea turtles were sampled and categorized into five body conditions ranging from very poor to very good. Injuries, skin deformities and plastron shape were used for this classification. Epibionts were collected from the same turtles and identified, with species richness, diversity, community structure and barnacle loading compared among body conditions. Epibiont communities were correlated with body condition as both species richness and abundance increased with a decline in turtle body condition. Barnacle epibionts showed great variation among different body conditions, having significantly higher numbers on turtles in poor condition. All parameters in this study showed similar distinctive relationships with body condition of loggerhead turtles from poor to very good body condition. The body condition index used in this study can be applied readily and, along with barnacle counts, can provide basic baseline information on turtle health.

Keywords

EpibiontsindicatoriSimangalisoloading
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 100 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 291 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguirre, AA and Lutz, PL (2004) Marine turtles as sentinels of ecosystem health: is fibropapillomatosis an indicator? EcoHealth 1, 275–283.Google Scholar
Aguirre, A, Limpus, C, Spraker, T and Balazs, G (1999) Survey of fibropapillomatosis and other potential diseases in marine turtles from Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. In Kalb, H and Wibbels, T (eds), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Conservation and Biology. Miami, FL: NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-443, p. 36.Google Scholar
Anderson, MJ and Walsh, DC (2013) PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: what null hypothesis are you testing? Ecological Monographs 83, 557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, MJ, Gorley, RN and Clarke, KR (2008) PRIMER+ for PERMANOVA: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Barnard, JL and Karaman, GS (1991) The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda (except marine gammaroids). Records of the Australian Museum Supplement 13, 1–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorndal, KA, Bolten, AB and Chaloupka, MY (2000) Green turtle somatic growth model: evidence for density dependence. Ecological Applications 10, 269–282.Google Scholar
Branch, G, Griffiths, C, Beckley, L and Branch, M (2017) Two Oceans: A Guide to the Marine Life of Southern Africa. Cape Town: Penguin Random House South Africa.Google Scholar
Clarke, KR and Warwick, R (2001) Change in Marine Communities. An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Clarke, KR and Gorley, RN (2006) Primer v6: User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Day, JH (1974) A Guide to Marine Life on South African Shores. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Deem, SL, Norton, TM, Mitchell, M, Segars, A, Alleman, RA, Cray, C, Poppenga, RH, Dodd, M and Karesh, WB (2009) Comparison of blood values in foraging, nesting, and stranded loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) along the coast of Georgia, USA. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 45, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epibiont Research Cooperative (2007) A synopsis of the literature on the turtle barnacles (Cirripedia: Balanomorpha: Coronuloidea) 1758–2007. Epibiont Research Cooperative Special Publication 1, 62.Google Scholar
Flint, M, Morton, JM, Limpus, CJ, Patterson-Kane, JC, Murray, PJ and Mills, PC (2010) Development and application of biochemical and haematological reference intervals to identify unhealthy green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas). The Veterinary Journal 185, 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frick, MG and Zardus, JD (2010) First authentic report of the turtle barnacle Cylindrolepas darwiniana since its description in 1916. Journal of Crustacean Biology 30, 292–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frick, MG, Williams, KL, Veljacic, D, Jackson, JA and Knight, SE (2002) Epibiont community succession on nesting loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, from Georgia, USA. In Mosier, A, Foley, A and Brost, B (eds), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation. Miami, FL: NOAA Technical Memorandum, NMFS-SEFSC-447, pp. 280–282.Google Scholar
George, RH (1997) Health problems and diseases of sea turtles. In Lutz, PL and Musick, JA (eds), The Biology of Sea Turtles, Vol. I. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 363–386.Google Scholar
Gibbon, JW, Scott, DE, Ryan, TJ, Buhlmann, KA, Tuberville, TD, Metts, BS, Greene, JL, Mills, T, Leiden, Y and Poppy, S (2000) The global decline of reptiles, déjà vu amphibians: reptile species are declining on a global scale. Six significant threats to reptile populations are habitat loss and degradation, introduced invasive species, environmental pollution, disease, unsustainable use, and global climate change. Bioscience 50, 653–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D (1998) Epizoites of Galapagos green turtles. In Byles, R and Fernandez, Y (eds), Proceedings of the 16th Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation. NOAA Tech. Memo, NMFSSEFSC-412.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, RJ, Work, TM, Balazs, GH, Sutton, CA, Casey, RN and Casey, JW (2004) The Ozobranchus leech is a candidate mechanical vector for the fibropapilloma-associated turtle herpesvirus found latently infecting skin tumors on Hawaiian green turtles (Chelonia mydas). Virology 321, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, CL (1976) Guide to the Benthic Marine Amphipods of Southern Africa. Trustees of the South African Museum.Google Scholar
Guinet, C, Roux, JP, Bonnet, M and Mison, V (1998) Effect of body size, body mass, and body condition on reproduction of female South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus) in Namibia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76, 1418–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, R and Tsuji, K (2008) Spatial distribution of turtle barnacles on the green sea turtle, Chelonia mydas. Ecological Research 23, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heithaus, MR (2013) Predators, prey, and the ecological roles of sea turtles. In Wyneken, J, Lohmann, KJ and Musick, JA (eds), The Biology of Sea Turtles, Vol. III. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 249–285.Google Scholar
Heithaus, MR, McLash, JJ, Frid, A, Dill, LM and Marshall, GJ (2002) Novel insights into green sea turtle behaviour using animal-borne video cameras. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 82, 1049–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, LH and Jacobson, ER (2003) Practical approaches for studying sea turtle health and disease. In Lutz, PL, Musick, JA and Weaken, J (eds), The Biology of Sea Turtles, Vol. II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 385–410.Google Scholar
Hughes, G (1974) The sea turtles of South-east Africa. 2. The biology of the Tongaland loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta L. with comments on the leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea L. and the green turtle Chelonia mydas L. in the study region. Durban: Oceanographic Research Institute.Google Scholar
Jessop, TS, Hamann, M and Limpus, CJ (2004) Body condition and physiological changes in male green turtles during breeding. Marine Ecology Progress Series 276, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labrada-Martagón, V, Méndez-Rodríguez, LC, Gardner, SC, Cruz-Escalona, VH and Zenteno-Savín, T (2010) Health indices of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) along the Pacific coast of Baja California Sur, Mexico. II. Body condition index. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 9, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Gouvello, DZ, Nel, R, Harris, LR, Bezuidenhout, K and Woodborne, S (2017) Identifying potential pathways for turtle-derived nutrients cycling through beach ecosystems. Marine Ecology Progress Series 583, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lezama, C, Carranza, A, Fallabrino, A, Estrades, A, Scarabino, F and López-Mendilaharsu, M (2013) Unintended backpackers: bio-fouling of the invasive gastropod Rapana venosa on the green turtle Chelonia mydas in the Río de la Plata Estuary, Uruguay. Biological Invasions 15, 483–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, T-H, Chang, C-C, Cheng, I-J and Lin, S-C (2015) Development of a summarized health index (SHI) for use in predicting survival in sea turtles. PLoS ONE 10, e0120796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monroe, R (1979) Barnacles on turtles in Queensland waters with descriptions of three new species. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 19, 197–223.Google Scholar
Nájera-Hillman, E, Bass, JB and Buckham, S (2012) Distribution patterns of the barnacle, Chelonibia testudinaria, on juvenile green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in Bahia Magdalena, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 83, 1171–1179.Google Scholar
Nel, R, Punt, AE and Hughes, GR (2013) Are coastal protected areas always effective in achieving population recovery for nesting sea turtles? PLoS ONE 8, e63525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrault, JR, Miller, DL, Eads, E, Johnson, C, Merrill, A, Thompson, LJ and Wyneken, J (2012) Maternal health status correlates with nest success of leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) from Florida. PLoS ONE 7, e31841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaller, JB, Bjorndal, KA, Reich, KJ, Williams, KL and Frick, MG (2006) Distribution patterns of epibionts on the carapace of loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom Marine Biodiversity Records 1, e36.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Robinson, NJ, Lazo-Wasem, EA, Paladino, FV, Zardus, JD and Pinou, T (2017) Assortative epibiosis of leatherback, olive ridley and green sea turtles in the Eastern Tropical Pacific. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 97, 1233–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, NJ, Lazo-Wasem, EM, Butler, BO, Lazo-Wasem, EA, Zardus, JD and Pinou, T (2019) Spatial distribution of epibionts on olive ridley sea turtles at Playa Ostional, Costa Rica. PLoS ONE 14, e0218838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, CA, Rasband, WS and Eliceiri, KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seminoff, JA, Jones, TT, Resendiz, A, Nichols, WJ and Chaloupka, MY (2003) Monitoring green turtles (Chelonia mydas) at a coastal foraging area in Baja California, Mexico: multiple indices to describe population status. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 1355–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamper, MA, Harms, C, Epperly, SP, Braun-McNeill, J, Avens, L and Stoskopf, MK (2005) Relationship between barnacle epibiotic load and hematologic parameters in loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta), a comparison between migratory and residential animals in Pamlico Sound, North Carolina. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 36, 635–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R and Woods, WA Jr (2006) Condition indices for conservation: new uses for evolving tools. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46, 1169–1190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, JA, Burkholder, D, Heithaus, MR and Dill, LM (2009) Validation of a rapid visual-assessment technique for categorizing the body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in the field. Copeia 2009, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman-Culleré, MH and Foltz, CJ (1999) Body condition scoring: a rapid and accurate method for assessing health status in mice. Comparative Medicine 49, 319–323.Google ScholarPubMed
Whiting, SD, Guinea, ML, Limpus, CJ and Fomiatti, K (2007) Blood chemistry reference values for two ecologically distinct populations of foraging green turtles, eastern Indian Ocean. Comparative Clinical Pathology 16, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witherington, B, Kubilis, P, Brost, B and Meylan, A (2009) Decreasing annual nest counts in a globally important loggerhead sea turtle population. Ecological Applications 19, 30–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zardus, JD, Nedvved, BT, Huang, Y, Tran, C and Hadfield, MG (2008) Microbial biofilms facilitate adhesion in biofouling invertebrates. Biological Bulletin 214, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed