Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:00:55.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cytochemical studies of acid phosphatase in etching cells of boring sponges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Shirley A. Pomponi
Shirley A. Pomponi
Affiliation:
University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, Miami, Florida 33149
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Etching cells of boring sponges effect the excavation of calcium carbonate substrates by partial chemical dissolution. They are characterized by the same features found in active osteoclasts, the cells which effect bone resorption in vertebrates. These similarities include a region of numerous cell processes and a system of cytoplasmic bodies, vesicles, and vacuoles which are structurally connected with a tubular system and with extra-cellular channels (Pomponi, 1979). An extensive rough endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi complex, and lysosomes indicate that a lysosomal system is operative (Pomponi, 1979). The lysosomal system has been implicated as the primary mechanism in the destruction of calcined tissue by osteoclasts (Vaes, 1968; Hancox, 1972, Gothlin & Ericsson, 1976; Holtrop & King, 1977). Vaes (1968) proposed that acid hydrolases of lysosomes are active in the resorption of the organic matrix of bone.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , August 1979 , pp. 785 - 789
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Essner, E., 1973. Phosphatases. In Electron Microscopy of Enzymes: Principles and Methods, vol. I (ed. Hayat, M. A.), pp. 44–76. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar
Gomori, G., 1952. Microscopic Histochemistry: Principles and Practice, pp. 184–194. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gomori, G., 1956. Histochemical methods for acid phosphatase. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 4, 453–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Göthlin, G. & Ericsson, J. L. E., 1971. Fine structural localization of acid phosphomonoesterase in the brush border region of osteoclasts. Histochemie, 28, 337–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Göthlin, G. & Ericsson, J. L. E., 1976. The osteoclast: review of ultrastructure, origin, and structure-function relationship. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 120, 201–231.Google Scholar
Hancox, N. M., 1972. The osteoclast. In The Biochemistry and Physiology of Bone, vol. 1 (ed. Bourne, G. H.), pp. 45–67. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handelman, C. S., Morse, A. & Irving, J. T., 1964. The enzyme histochemistry of the osteoclasts of normal and ‘ia’ rats. American Journal of Anatomy, 115, 363–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holtrop, M. E. & King, G. J., 1977. The ultrastructure of the osteoclast and its functional implications. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 123, 177–196.Google Scholar
Lucht, U., 1971. Acid phosphatase of osteoclasts demonstrated by electron microscopic histo-chemistry. Histochemie, 28, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucht, U., 1972. Cytoplasmic vacuoles and bodies of the osteoclast: an electron microscope study. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und microskopische Anatomie, 135, 229–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucht, U. & Nørgaard, J. O., 1976. Export of protein from the osteoclast as studied by electron microscopic autoradiography. Cell and Tissue Research, 168, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, E. H. & Birbeck, M. S. C., 1966. Electron Microscopy: A Handbook for Biologists. 102 pp. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Novikoff, A. B., 1963. Lysosomes in the physiology and pathology of cells: contribution of staining methods. In Ciba Foundation Symposium on Lysosomes (ed. Dereuck, A. V. S. and Cameron, M. P.), pp. 36–77. London: J. & A. Churchill, Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novikoff, A. B., Essner, E., Goldfischer, S. & Heus, M., 1962. Nucleosidephosphatase activities of cytomembranes. Symposia. International Society for Cell Biology, 1, 149–192.Google Scholar
Pang, R. K., 1973. The systematics of some Jamaican excavating sponges (Porifera). Postilla, 161, 1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomponi, S. A., 1979. Ultrastructure of cells associated with excavation of calcium carbonate substrates by boring sponges. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 777–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, E. S., 1963. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology, 17, 208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rützler, K. & Rieger, R., 1973. Sponge burrowing: fine structure of Cliona lampa penetrating calcareous substrata. Marine Biology, 21, 144–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, B. H., Levin, L. S. & Doty, S. B., 1974. Ultrastructure and lysosomal histochemistry of ia rat osteoclasts. Calcified Tissue Research, 14, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaes, G., 1968. On the mechanisms of bone resorption. Journal of Cell Biology, 39, 676–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed