Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:46:40.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coral farming: effects of light, water motion and artificial foods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2011

Zac H. Forsman ,
Bethany K. Kimokeo ,
Christopher E. Bird ,
Cynthia L. Hunter  and
Robert J. Toonen
Zac H. Forsman*
Affiliation:
Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, PO Box 1346, Kaneohe HI 96744
Bethany K. Kimokeo
Affiliation:
Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, PO Box 1346, Kaneohe HI 96744
Christopher E. Bird
Affiliation:
Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, PO Box 1346, Kaneohe HI 96744
Cynthia L. Hunter
Affiliation:
Biology Department, 2450 Campus Road, University of Hawaii, Honolulu HI 96822
Robert J. Toonen
Affiliation:
Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, PO Box 1346, Kaneohe HI 96744
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Z.H. Forsman, Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, PO Box 1346, Kaneohe HI 96744 email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Improved coral cultivation will facilitate the reduction of wild harvesting, reef restoration, preservation of biodiversity, and the use of corals as model experimental organisms. In this study, we examine species-specific responses in growth and survival of corals from the effects of light, water motion and artificial (i.e. non-living aquarium trade) food supplements. Three species representing distinct, diverse and abundant coral genera were chosen (Montipora capitata(Mc), Porites compressa (Pc) and Pocillopora damicornis (Pd)) for three experiments to examine: (1) the interaction of water flow and light on growth and survival of Mc and Pc; (2) the effects of artificial foods on Mc, Pc and Pd; and (3) the effects of increasing dosage of artificial foods in an open system on Mc and Pc. Pc thrived at the highest light levels with low flow, while Mc exhibited bleaching and reduced growth in the same conditions and grew best in shaded treatments. High constant flow (~11 cm s-1) resulted in slightly less overall growth than low constant flow (~4 cm s-1). Some artificial foods resulted in a significant increase in growth in Mc and Pd, but not in Pc. These combined results suggest that Mc may be more heterotrophic than Pc. This study illustrates that each species has unique requirements for optimal growth conditions that can be determined by relatively simple and low cost experiments, but that ideal conditions for one species might not be generalized to others.

Keywords

coral aquaculturecoral foodslightwater flowPorites compressaPocillopora damicornisMontipora capitata
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 92 , Issue 4: Coral Reefs, the Aquarium Trade and the Maritime Industry , June 2012 , pp. 721 - 729
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anthony, K.R.N. (1999) Coral suspension feeding on fine particulate matter. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 232, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, K.R.N. and Connolly, S.R. (2004) Environmental limits to growth: physiological niche boundaries of corals along turbidity–light gradients. Oecologia 141, 373–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anthony, K.R.N and Fabricius, K. E. (2000) Shifting roles of heterotrophy and autotrophy in coral energetics under varying turbidity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 252, 221–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bak, R.P.M., Joenje, M., de Jong, I., Lambrechts, D.Y.M. and Nieuwaland, G. (1998) Bacterial suspension feeding by coral reef benthic organisms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 175, 285–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buddemeir, R.W. and Kinzie, R.A. (1976) Coral growth. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 14, 183–225.Google Scholar
Clark, S. and Edwards, A.J. (1995) Coral transplantation as an aid to reef rehabilitation: evaluation of a case study in the Maldive Islands. Coral Reefs 14, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delbeek, J.C. (2001) Coral farming: past, present and future trends. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennison, W.C. and Barns, D.J. (1988) Effect of water motion on coral photosynthesis and calcification. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 155, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A.J. and Clark, S. (1998) Coral transplantation: a useful management tool or misguided meddling? Marine Pollution Bulletin 37, 474–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, K.E. (2006) Effects of irradiance, flow, and colony pigmentation on the temperature microenvironment around corals: implications for coral bleaching? Limnology and Oceanography 51, 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrier-Pagès, C., Witting, J., Tambutté, E. and Sebens, K.P. (2003) Effect of natural zooplankton feeding on the tissue and skeletal growth of the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata. Coral Reefs 22, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finelli, C.M., Helmuth, B.S., Pentcheff, N.D. and Wethey, D.S. (2005) Water flow influences oxygen transport and photosynthetic efficiency in corals. Coral Reefs 25, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsman, Z., Rinkevich, B. and Hunter, C. (2006) Investigating fragment size for culturing reef-building corals (Porites Lobata and P. Compressa) in ex situ nurseries. Aquaculture 261, 89–97.Google Scholar
Gochfeld, D.J. and Aeby, G.S. (1997) Control of populations of the coral feeding nudibranch Phestilla sibogae by fish and crustacean predators. Marine Biology 130, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, L. (2007) Evaluation of live food versus artificial food on the growth of juvenile Pocillopora damicornis cultured from planulae. Advanced Aquarist Online Magazine VI. http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2007/6/aafeature1Google Scholar
Goreau, T.F., Goreau, N.I. and Yonge, C.M. (1971) Reef corals: autotrophs or heterotrophs. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 141, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotolli, A.G., Rodriguez, L.J. and Palardy, J.E. (2006) Heterotrophic plasticity and resilience in bleached corals. Nature 440, 1186–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highsmith, R.C. (1982) Reproduction by fragmentation in corals. Marine Ecology Progress Series 7, 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokiel, P.L. (1978) Effects of water motion on reef corals. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 35, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuffner, I.B. (2000) Effects of ultraviolet radiation and water motion on the reef coral Porites compressa Dana: a flume experiment. Marine Biology 138, 467–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuffner, I.B. (2002) Effects of ultraviolet radiation and water motion on the reef coral Porites compressa Dana: a transplantation experiment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 270, 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larned, S.T. (1998) Nitrogen-versus phosphorous-limited growth and sources of nutrients for coral reef macroalgae. Marine Biology 132, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesser, M.P., Weis, V.M., Patterson, M.R. and Jokiel, P.L. (1994) Effects of morphology and water motion on carbon delivery and productivity in the reef coral Pocillopora damicornis (Linnaeus): diffusion barriers, inorganic carbon limitation, and biochemical plasticity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 178, 153–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, J.W. and Polsenberg, J.F. (2004) Coral–algal phase shifts on coral reefs: ecological and environmental aspects. Progress in Oceanography 60, 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muscatine, L. (1990) The role of symbiotic algae in carbon and energy flux in reef corals. In Dubinsky, Z. (ed.) Ecosystems of the world: coral reefs. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 75–87.Google Scholar
Nakamura, T., van Woesik, R. and Yamasaki, H. (2005) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis is reduced by water flow in the reef-building coral Acropora digitifera. Marine Ecology Progress Series 301, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinkevich, B. (1995) Restoration strategies for coral reefs damaged by recreational activities: the use of sexual and asexual recruits. Restoration Ecology 3, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinkevich, B. (2000) Steps towards the evaluation of coral reef restoration by using small branch fragments. Marine Biology 136, 807–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinkevich, B. (2005) Conservation of coral reefs through active restoration measures: recent approaches and last decade progress. Environmental Science and Technology 39, 4333–4342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawall, Y., Teichberg, M.C., Seemann, J., Litaay, M., Jompa, J. and Richter, C. (2011) Nutritional status and metabolism of the coral Stylophora subseriata along a eutrophication gradient in Spermonde Archipelago (Indonesia). Coral Reefs 30, 841–853. DOI:10.1007/s00338-011-0764-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K.P., Vandersall, K.S., Savina, L.A. and Graham, K.R. (1996) Zooplankton capture by two scleractinian corals, Madracis mirabilis and Montastrea cavernosa, in a field enclosure. Marine Biology 127, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K.P., and Done, T.J. (1992) Water flow, growth form and distribution of scleractinian corals: Davies Reef (GBR), Australia. Proceedings of the Seventh International Coral Reef Symposium 1, 557–568.Google Scholar
Stambler, N., Popper, N., Dubinsky, Z. and Stimson, J. (1991) Effects of nutrient enrichment and water motion on the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Pacific Science 45, 299–307.Google Scholar
Titlyanov, E.A., Leletkin, V.A., Ermak, V.D. and Voskoboinikov, G.M. (1990) Light adaptation of mass species of reef-building corals. Soviet Journal of Marine Biology 16, 25–31.Google Scholar
Titlyanov, E.A., Titlyanova, T.V., Yamazoto, K. and van Woesik, R. (2001) Photo-acclimation of the hermatypic coral Stylophra pistillata while subjected to either starvation or food provisioning. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 257, 163–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Titlyanov, E.A. and Titlyanova, T.V. (2002) Reef-building corals—symbiotic autotrophic organisms: 1. general structure, feeding pattern, and light-dependent distribution in the shelf. Russian Journal of Marine Biology 28, 51–515.Google Scholar
Toonen, RJ., Batchelor, K. and Mai, T. (2002) Planktonic foods for the reef aquarium: if you feed the tank, are these foods for you? Marine Fish & Reef USA Annual 2002 4, 18–31.Google Scholar
Wellington, G.M. (1982) An experimental analysis of the effects of light and zooplankton on coral zonation. Oecologia 52, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeij, M.J.A. and Bak, R.P.M. (2002) How are coral populations structured by light? Marine light regimes and the distribution of Madracis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 233, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar