Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-mgq6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-01T22:49:59.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Contribution of Amphipoda to the Diet of Certain Inshore Fish Species in Kames Bay, Millport

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D.J. Beare  and
P.G. Moore
D.J. Beare
Affiliation:
University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland, KA28 OEG
P.G. Moore
Affiliation:
University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland, KA28 OEG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Thirteen species of Amphipoda have been recorded from the stomachs of plaice and 11 species from dabs, with Perioculodes longimanus the most notable prey oedicerotid in both flatfish species sampled from the shallow sublittoral zone (<-6 m depth) at Kames Bay, Millport. Plaice took mostly bivalve siphon tips (Angulus sp.). Polychaetes were more numerous in larger plaice. Sand gobies specialized on small crustaceans, taking 13 amphipod species inter alia (with P. longimanus again the most notable oedicerotid). Amphipod numbers in sand goby stomachs increased with the length of the fish. Neither dabs nor sand gobies consumed bivalve siphon tips and only rarely consumed polychaetes. Although amphipods formed only a minor part of the diet of plaice, at the population density known for this species in this bay, its depredations would still constitute an important selective agency governing patterns of activity in epibenthic oedicerotids.

Type
Short Communications
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , August 1997 , pp. 907 - 910
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basimi, R.A. & Grove, D.J., 1985. Gastric emptying rate in Pleuronectes platessa L. Journal of Fish Biology, 26, 545–552.Google Scholar
Beare, D.J., 1994. The comparative ecology of eight species of oedicerotid amphipod. PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Doornbos, G. & Twisk, F., 1987. Density, growth and annual food consumption of gobiid fish in the saline Lake Grevelingen, the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research. 21, 45–74.Google Scholar
Downie, A.J., 1990. The reproduction and development of flatfish in the proximity of the sludge dump site in the Firth of Clyde, PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Hyslop, E.J., 1980. Stomach contents analysis - a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology, 17, 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poxton, M.G., Eleftheriou, A. & Mclntyre, A.D., 1983. The food and growth of 0-group flatfish on nursery grounds in the Clyde Sea area. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 17, 319–337.Google Scholar
Thorman, S. & Wiederholm, A.-M., 1983. Seasonal occurrence and food resource use of an assemblage of nearshore fish species in the Bothnian Sea, Sweden. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 10, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorman, S. & Wiederholm, A.-M., 1984. Species composition and dietary relationships in a brackish shallow water fish assemblage in the Bothnian Sea, Sweden. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 19, 359–371.Google Scholar
Thorman, S. & Wiederholm, A.-M., 1986. Food, habitat and time niches in a coastal fish species assemblage in a brackish water bay in the Bothnian Sea, Sweden. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 95, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlas, J. De, 1979. Annual food intake by plaice and flounder in a tidal flat area in the Dutch Wadden Sea, with special reference to consumption of regenerating parts of macrobenthic prey. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 13, 117–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar