Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:45:09.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consumption Rates of Six Species of Marine Benthic Naked Amoebae (Gymnamoebia) From Sediments in The Clyde Sea Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Helen Butler
Affiliation:
University Marine Biological Station Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, KA28 OEG, Scotland.
Andrew Rogerson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701, USA.

Extract

Six species of naked amoebae, ranging in size from 45 to 3258 μm3, were isolated from benthic sediments of the Clyde Sea area. The number of fluorescently labelled bacteria (FLB) consumed by these amoebae was determined at 5, 10, 15 and 20°C. Consumption rates varied markedly, ranging from 0·2 to 194·7 bacteria h−1 (equivalent to 0·16–155·8 μim3 bacterial biomass). However, only some of these values were considered to be optimal; several of the uptake values were too low to account for the measured growth rates of amoebae. Using the optimal consumption rate data, the mean specific rates increased from 0·042 bacteria h−1 μm3 at 5°C to 0·131 bacteria h−1 μm−3 at 20°C. This is the first study to detail the ingestion rates of a range of bacterivorous marine gymnamoebae.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, P. & Fenchel, T., 1985. Bacterivory by microheterotrophic flagellates in seawater samples. Limnology and Oceanography, 30, 198202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, O.R. & Rogerson, A., 1995. Annual abundances and growth potential of Gymnamoebae in the Hudson Estuary with comparative data from the Firth of Clyde. European Journal of Protistology, 31, 223233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antai, E.E., 1989. Seasonal trophodynamics of bacterioplankton and heterotrophic microflagellates in Southampton water. PhD thesis, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
Bird, D.F. & Kalff, J., 1993. Protozoan grazing and size-activity structure in limnetic bacterial communities. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50, 370380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloem, J., Ellenbroek, F.M., Baer-Gilissen, M.-J. & Cappenberg, T.E., 1989. Protozoan grazing and bacterial production in stratified Lake Vechten estimated with fluorescently labelled bacteria and by thymidine incorporation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 55, 17871795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, H.G., 1994. The ecological importance of marine benthic naked amoebae. PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Butler, H. & Rogerson, A., 1995. Temporal and spatial abundance of naked amoebae (Gymnamoebae) in marine benthic sediments of the Clyde Sea area, Scotland. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 42, 724730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, H. & Rogerson, A., 1996. Growth potential, production efficiency and annual production of marine benthic naked amoebae (Gymnamoebae) inhabiting sediments of the Clyde Sea area, Scotland. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 10, 123129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capriulo, G.M., 1991. Community grazing in heterotrophic marine protista - session summary. In Protozoa and their role in marine processes (ed. P.C., Reid et al.), pp. 205218. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. [NATO ASI Series, vol. G25.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlough, L.A. & Meyer, J.L., 1991. Bacterivory by sestonic protists in a southeastern backwater river. Limnology and Oceanography, 36, 873883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, D. A., Goldman, J.C. & Dennett, M.R., 1986. Effect of temperature on growth, respiration and nutrient regeneration by an omnivorous microflagellate. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 52, 13401347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caron, D.A., Lim, E.L., Miceli, G., Waterbury, J.B. & Valois, F.W., 1991. Grazing and utilization of chroococcoid cyanobacteria and heterotrophic bacteria by protozoa in laboratory cultures and a coastal plankton community. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 76, 205217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J.W. & Stoecker, D.K., 1989. Effects of fixation on cell volume of marine planktonic protozoa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 55, 17611765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cynar, F.J. & Sieburth, J.McN., 1986. Unambiguous detection and improved quantification of phagotrophy in apochlorotic nanoflagellates using fluorescent microspheres and concomitant phase contrast and epifluorescence microscopy. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 32, 6170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenchel, T., 1975. The quantitative importance of the benthic microfauna of an Arctic tundra pond. Hydrobiologia, 46, 445464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groscop, J.A. & Brent, M.M., 1964. The effects of selected strains of pigmented microorganisms on small free-living amoebae. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 10, 579584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hondeveld, B.J.M., Bak, R.P.M. & Duyl, F.C. van, 1992. Bacterivory by heterotrophic nanoflagellates in marine sediments measured by uptake of fluorescently labelled bacteria. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 89, 6371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, K. & Güde, H., 1991. Seasonal changes in the grazing impact of phagotrophic flagellates on bacteria in Lake Constance. Marine Microbial Food Webs, 5, 2737.Google Scholar
Kemp, P.F., 1988. Bacterivory by benthic ciliates: significance as a carbon source and impact on sediment bacteria. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 49, 163169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, P.F., 1990. The fate of benthic bacterial production. Reviews in Aquatic Sciences, 2, 109124.Google Scholar
Kuuppo-Leinikki, P. & Kuosa, H., 1990. Estimation of flagellate grazing on bacteria by size fractionation in the northern Baltic Sea. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, beiheft Ergebnisse der Limnologie, 34, 283290.Google Scholar
Laybourn, J. & Whymant, L., 1980. The effect of diet and temperature on reproductive rate of Arcella vulgaris Ehrenberg (Sarcodina: Testacida). Oecologia, 45, 282284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levrat, P., Pussard, M., Steinberg, C. & Alabouvette, C., 1991. Regulation of Fusarium oxysporum populations introduced into soil: the amoebal predation hypothesis. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 86, 123130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, G.B. & Okubo, A., 1991. On the use of surrogate food particles to measure protistan ingestion. Limnology and Oceanography, 36, 613617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, K., Børsheim, K.Y. & Thingstad, T.F., 1988. Grazing rates on bacteria by marine heterotrophic microflagellates compared to uptake rates of bacterial-sized monodispersed fluorescent latex beads. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 44, 159165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pace, M.L., McManus, G.B. & Findlay, S.E.G., 1990. Planktonic community structure determines the fate of bacterial production in a temperate lake. Limnology and Oceanography, 35, 795808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, F.C., 1983. Marine Gymnamoebae. Cambridge: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.Google Scholar
Polne-Fuller, M., Rogerson, A., Amano, H. & Gibor, A., 1990. Digestion of seaweeds by the marine amoeba Trichosphaerium sieboldi. Hydrobiologia, 204/205, 409413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, A., 1981. The ecological energetics of Amoeba proteus (Protozoa). Hydrobiologia, 85, 117128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, A., Butler, H.G. & Thomason, J.C., 1994. Estimation of amoeba cell volume from nuclear diameter and its application to studies in protozoan ecology. Hydrobiologia, 284, 229234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, A., Hannah, F. & Gothe, G., 1996. The grazing potential of some unusual marine benthic amoebae feeding on bacteria. European Journal of Protistology, 32, 271279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, A. & Laybourn-Parry, J., 1992. The abundance of marine naked amoebae in the water column of the Clyde Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 34, 187196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherr, B.F. & Sherr, E.B., 1991. Proportional distribution of total numbers, biovolume and bacterivory among size classes of 2–20 μm nonpigmented marine flagellates. Marine Microbial Food Webs, 5, 227237.Google Scholar
Sherr, B.F., Sherr, E.B. & Berman, T., 1983. Grazing, growth and ammonium excretion rates of a heterotrophic microflagellate fed with four species of bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 45, 11961201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherr, B.F., Sherr, E.B. & Fallon, R.D., 1987. Use of monodispersed, fluorescently labelled bacteria to estimate in situ protozoan bacterivory. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53, 958965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherr, E.B., 1988. Direct use of high molecular weight polysaccharide by heterotrophic flagellates. Nature, London, 335, 348351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaqué, D., Pace, M.L., Findlay, S. & Lints, D., 1992. Fate of bacterial production in a heterotrophic ecosystem: grazing by protists and metazoans in the Hudson Estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 89, 155163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verity, P.G., 1985. Grazing, respiration, excretion and growth rates of tintinnids. Limnology and Oceanography, 30, 12681282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weekers, P.H.H., Bodelier, P.L.E., Wijen, J.P.H. & Vogels, G.D., 1993. Effects of grazing by the free-living soil amoebae Acanthamoeba castellanii, Acanthamoeba polyphaga and Hartmannella vermiformis on various bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59, 23172319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwart, K.B. & Darbyshire, J., 1992. Growth and nitrogenous excretion of a common soil flagellate Spumella sp. - a laboratory experiment. Journal of Soil Science, 43, 145147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar