Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:39:55.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of the fish assemblages on natural and artificial reefs off Sal Island (Cape Verde)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2012

Miguel N. Santos ,
Miguel T. Oliveira  and
João Cúrdia
Miguel N. Santos*
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional dos Recursos Biológicos (INRB, I.P./L-IPIMAR), Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal
Miguel T. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Oceanário de Lisboa S.A., Esplanada D. Carlos I, 1990-005 Lisboa, Portugal Universidade do Algarve, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
João Cúrdia
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional dos Recursos Biológicos (INRB, I.P./L-IPIMAR), Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM) & Departamento de Biologia, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810–193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M.N. Santos, Instituto Nacional dos Recursos Biológicos (INRB, I.P./L-IPIMAR), Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tourism is a growing activity in Cape Verde, which can lead to more intensive and uncontrolled fishing and diving activities, affecting the quality of marine habitats. To mitigate this biodiversity problem, a private diving operator, supported by the local authorities, decided to deploy the first artificial reefs (ARs) in the Archipelago just off Santa Maria Bay (Sal Island). To evaluate the ARs capacity to promote marine fish biodiversity in Santa Maria Bay, the fish assemblages were compared to those from nearby natural reefs (NRs), located at the same depth (10 and 28 m depth), by means of visual census. All study sites were surveyed by visual census in August 2009. A total of 64 species were recorded, mostly consisting of sedentary and/or benthophagous demersal species, followed by highly-sedentary benthic cryptic species. ‘Tchuklassa’ NR showed the highest species richness (58 species), while the lowest was recorded at ‘Santo Antão’ AR (48 species). An overall positive relationship was observed between habitat rugosity and mean species richness. The results showed a high percentage of common species on both reef types. Higher mean values of community descriptors (number of species, Shannon–Weaver diversity index, Simpson dominance index and equitability) and fish density were found on the ARs, with slightly higher densities recorded on the deeper reefs. These results suggest that ARs can have an important role promoting the local fish biodiversity and supporting local sustainable development of diving tourism.

Keywords

natural and artificial reefsfish assemblageshabitat complexitydiving tourismSanta Maria BaySal Island (Cape Verde)
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Special Issue 2: Fish and Fisheries , March 2013 , pp. 437 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, M.J. (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26, 32–46.Google Scholar
Anon (2004) Plano de acção nacional para o ambiente (PANA II). Volume I. Ministério do Ambiente, Agricultura e Pescas, Cabo Verde, 34 pp.Google Scholar
Anon (2009) Plano estratégico para desenvolvimento do turismo 2010–2013. Ministério da Economia crescimento e Competitividade, Direcção Geral de Turismo, Cabo Verde, 132 pp.Google Scholar
Anon (2011) Boletim estatístico nº 18, dados sobre pesca artesanal, pesca industrial, conservas e exportações—ano de 2009. Instituto Nacional de Desenvolvimento das Pescas, Ministério do Ambiente, do Desenvolvimento Rural e dos Recursos Marinhos, Cabo Verde, 74 pp.Google Scholar
Ardizzone, G.D., Belluscio, A. and Somaschini, A. (1997) Fish colonisation and feeding habits on a Mediterranean artificial habitat. In Hawkins, L.E., Hutchinson, S., Jensen, A.C., Sheader, M. and William, J.A. (eds) The responses of marine organisms to their environments. Proceedings of the 30th European Biological Symposium, University of Southampton, UK, pp. 265–273.Google Scholar
Baine, M. and Side, J. (2003) Habitat modification and manipulation as a sea ranching management tool. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 13, 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benaka, L.R. (1999) Summary of panel discussions and steps toward an agenda for habitat policy and science. In Benaka, L.R. (ed.) Fish habitat: essential fish habitat and rehabilitation, Proceedings of the Sea Grant Symposium of the American Fisheries Society 22, Bethesda, Maryland (USA), pp. 455–459.Google Scholar
Bingham, N.H. and Fry, J.M. (2010) Regression–linear models in statistics. London: Springer, 284 pp.Google Scholar
Bohnsack, J.A., Johnson, D.L. and Ambrose, R.F. (1991) Ecology of artificial reefs habitats and fishes. In Seaman, W. Jr and Sprague, L. (eds) Artificial habitats for marine and freshwater fisheries. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc., pp. 61–107.Google Scholar
Bortone, S.A., Brandini, F.P., Fabi, G., and Otake, S. (eds) (2011) Artificial reefs in fisheries management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 332 pp.Google Scholar
Bortone, S.A., Samoilys, M.A. and Francour, P. (2000) Fish and macroinvertebrate evaluation methods. In Seaman, J.W. Jr (ed) Artificial reef evaluation with application to natural marine habitats. New York: CRC Press, pp. 127–164.Google Scholar
Bortone, S.A., Tassell, J.V., Brito, A., Falcon, J.M., Mena, J. and Bundrick, C.M. (1994) Enhancement of the nearshore fish assemblage in the Canary Islands with artificial reefs. Bulletin of Marine Science 55, 602–608.Google Scholar
Brock, V.E. (1954) A preliminary report on a method of estimating reef fish populations. Journal of Wildlife Management 18, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, R.M. and Hueckel, G.J. (1989) Analysis of visual transects for fish assessment on artificial reefs. Bulletin of Marine Science 44, 893–898.Google Scholar
Bustos, R., Luque, A. and Pajuelo, J.G. (2009) Age estimation and growth pattern of the island grouper, Mycteroperca fusca (Serranidae) in an island population on the northwest coast of Africa. Scientia Marina 73, 319–328.Google Scholar
Carr, M.H. and Hixon, M.A. (1997) Artificial reefs: the importance of comparisons with natural reefs. Fisheries 22, 28–33.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. 2nd edition. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R., Somerfield, P.J. and Chapman, M.G. (2006) On resemblance measures for ecological studies, including taxonomic dissimilarities and a zero-adjusted Bray–Curtis coefficient for denuded assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 330, 55–80.Google Scholar
Clewell, A.F., Rieger, J. and Munro, J. (2000) Guidelines for developing and managing ecological restoration projects. Washington, DC: Publications Working Group, Society for Ecological Restoration, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Debelius, H. (1997) Mediterranean and Atlantic fish guide. Frankfurt, Germany: IKAN, 305 pp.Google Scholar
D'Itri, F.M. (ed.) (1986) Artificial reefs: marine and fresh water applications. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers, Inc., 589 pp.Google Scholar
Dufrêne, M. and Legendre, P. (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67, 345–366.Google Scholar
Ferreira, C.E.L., Goncalves, J.E.A. and Coutinho, R. (2001) Community structure of fishes and habitat complexity on a tropical rocky shore. Environonmental Biology of Fishes 61, 353–369.Google Scholar
Franca, M.L.P. and Vasconcelos, M.S. (1962) Peixes do Arquipélago de Cabo Verde. Notas Mimeografadas do Centro de Biologia Piscatória 28, 1–86.Google Scholar
Friedlander, A.M. and Parrish, J.D. (1998) Habitat characteristics affecting fish assemblages on a Hawaiian coral reef. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 204, 1–30.Google Scholar
Gascon, D. and Miller, R.A. (1981) Colonization by near-shore fish on small artificial reefs in Barkley Sound, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59, 1635–1646.Google Scholar
Gorham, J.C. and Alevizon, W.S. (1989) Habitat complexity and the abundance of juvenile fishes residing on small scale artificial reefs. Bulletin of Marine Science 44, 662–665.Google Scholar
Gratwicke, B. and Speight, M.R. (2005) The relationship between fish species richness, abundance and habitat complexity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats. Journal of Fish Biology 66, 650–667.Google Scholar
Harmelin, J.G. (1987) Structure et variabilité de l'ichtyofaune d'une zone rocheuse protégée en Méditerranée (Parc National de Port-Cros, France). Marine Ecology 8, 263–284.Google Scholar
Harmelin-Vivien, M., Harmelin, J.G., Chauvet, C., Duval, C., Galzin, R., Lejeune, P., Barnabé, G., Blanc, F., Chevalier, R., Duclerc, L. and Lassèrre, G. (1985) Evaluation visuelle des peuplements et populations de poissons: problèms et méthodes. Revue d’Écologie (Terre et Vie) 40, 467–539.Google Scholar
Herrera, R., Espino, F., Garrido, M. and Haroun, R.J. (2002) Observations on fish colonization and predation on two artificial reefs in the Canary Islands. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, S69–S73.Google Scholar
Heyman, W., Carr, L. and Lobel, P. (2010) Diver ecotourism and disturbance to reef fish spawning aggregations: it is better to be disturbed than to be dead. Marine Ecology Progress Series 419, 201–210.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.C., Collins, K.J. and Lockwood, A.P.M. (eds) (2000) Artificial reefs in European seas. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R.S. and Thompson, M.J. (1978) Comparison of Florida reef fish assemblages using a rapid visual technique. Bulletin of Marine Science 28, 159–172.Google Scholar
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modeling. Volume 20. 2nd edition. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lloris, D., Rucabado, J. and Figueroa, H. (1991) Biogeography of the Macaronesian ichthyofauna. Boletim do Museu Municipal do Funchal 43 (Supplement 234), 191–241.Google Scholar
Luckhurst, B.E. and Luckhurst, K. (1978) Analysis of the influence of substrate variables on coral reef fish communities. Marine Biology 49, 317–323.Google Scholar
Luna, B., Pérez, C.V. and Sánchez-Lizaso, J.L. (2009) Benthic impacts of recreational divers in a Mediterranean Marine Protected Area. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66, 517–523.Google Scholar
Mitchell-Thomé, R. (1972) Outline of the geology of the Cape Verde Archipelago. International Journal of Earth Sciences 61 (Supplement 3), 1087–1109.Google Scholar
Monteiro, P., Ribeiro, D., Silva, J.A., Bispo, J. and Gonçalves, J.M.S. (2008) Ichthyofauna assemblages from two unexplored Atlantic seamounts: Northwest Bank and João Valente Bank (Cape Verde archipelago). Scientia Marina 72, 133–143.Google Scholar
Ody, D. and Harmelin, J.G. (1994) Influence de l'architecture et de la localisation des récifs artificiels sur leurs peuplements de poissons en Méditerranée. Cybium 18, 14.Google Scholar
PADI (2011) Worldwide corporate statistics 2010. Available at http://www.padi.com/scuba/uploadedFiles/2010%20WW%20Statistics.pdf (accessed 23 January 2012).Google Scholar
Palmer-Zwahlen, M.L. and Aseltine, D.A. (1994) Successional development of the turf community on a quarry rock artificial reef. Bulletin of Marine Science 55, 902–923.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.Google Scholar
Reiner, F. (1996) Catálogo dos peixes do arquipélago de Cabo Verde. Instituto Português de Investigação Marítima. Publicações Avulsas do IPIMAR No. 2, 339 pp.Google Scholar
Rilov, G. and Benayahu, Y. (2000) Fish assemblage on natural versus vertical artificial reefs: the rehabilitation perspective. Marine Biology 136, 931–942.Google Scholar
Roberts, C.M. and Ormond, R.F.G. (1987) Habitat complexity and coral reef fish diversity and abundance on Red Sea fringing reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 41, 1–8.Google Scholar
Roberts, C.M., McClean, C.J., Veron, J.E.N, Hawkins, J.P., Allen, G.R., McAllister, D.E., Mittermeier, C.G., Schueler, F.W., Spalding, M., Wells, F., Vynne, C. and Werner, T.B. (2002) Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs. Science 295, 1280–1284.Google Scholar
Rooker, J.R., Dokken, Q.R., Pattengill, C.V. and Holt, G.J. (1997) Fish assemblages on artificial and natural reefs in the Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary, USA. Coral Reefs 16, 83–92.Google Scholar
Rouphael, A.B. and Inglis, G.J. (1997) Impacts of recreational SCUBA diving at sites with different reef topographies. Biological Conservation 82, 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, M.N., Monteiro, C.C. and Lassèrre, G. (2005) Observations and trends on the intra-annual variation of the fish assemblages on two artificial reefs in Algarve coastal waters (southern Portugal). Scientia Marina 69, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, M.N., Leitão, F., Lino, P.G., Moura, A., Cerqueira, M. and Monteiro, C.C. (2011) Diplodus spp. assemblages on artificial reefs of different ages: influence of the associated epibenthic macrofauna. ICES Journal of Marine Science 68, 87–97.Google Scholar
Seaman, W. Jr and Sprague, L.M. (1991) Artificial habitats practices in aquatic systems. In Seaman, J.W. Jr and Sprague, L. (eds) Artificial habitats for marine and freshwater fisheries. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc., pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, J. (1987) Introduction to biostatistics. 2nd edition. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Thanner, S.E., McIntosh, T.L. and Blair, S.M. (2006) Development of benthic and fish assemblages on artificial reef materials compared to adjacent natural reef assemblages in Miami—Dade County, Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science 78, 57–70.Google Scholar
Thompson, M.J. and Schmidt, T.W. (1977) Validation of the species/time random count technique for sampling fish assemblages. Proceedings of the 3rd International Coral Reef Symposium, Miami, Florida 1, 283–288.Google Scholar
Tratalos, J.A. and Austin, T.J. (2001) Impacts of recreational SCUBA diving on coral communities of the Caribbean island of Grand Cayman. Biological Conservation 102, 67–75.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uyarra, M.C. and Coté, I.M. (2007) The quest for cryptic creatures: impacts of species-focused recreational diving on corals. Biological Conservation 136, 77–84.Google Scholar
Walsh, W.J. (1985) Reef fish community dynamics on small artificial reefs: the influence of isolation, habitat structure, and biogeography. Bulletin of Marine Science 36, 357–376.Google Scholar
Wilson, S.K., Graham, N.A.J. and Polunin, N.V.C. (2007) Appraisal of visual assessments of habitat complexity and benthic composition on coral reefs. Marine Biology 151, 1069–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakai, D. and Chadwick-Furman, N.E. (2002) Impacts of intensive recreational diving on reef corals at Eilat, Red Sea. Coral Reefs 105, 179–187.Google Scholar
Zhou, M., Paduan, J. and Niiler, P. (2000) Surface currents in the Canary Basin from drifter observations. Journal of Geophysical Research 105, 21893–21911.Google Scholar