Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:21:12.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparative Study of the Reproductive Cycles of Three Northumberland Populations of Chaetozone Setosa (Polychaeta:Cirratulidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Graeme Christie
Affiliation:
Dove Marine Laboratory, Cullercoats, North Shields, Tyne & Wear NE30 4PZ

Extract

During a study of the reproductive cycle of a subtidal population of Chaetozone setosa Malmgren at an 80 m station off the Northumberland coast (Christie, 1981), the discovery of morphological and reproductive differences in an intertidal population lead to an extended comparative study of three Northumberland populations. The two additional populations chosen for comparison are situated at Low Newton by the Sea and Holy Island, Northumberland. All three populations are located within a maximum distance of 65 km from each other which makes these populations very close on a geographical scale.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchanan, J. B. & Warwick, R. M., 1974. An estimate of benthic macrofaunal production in the offshore mud of the Northumberland coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 197222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caullery, M. & Mesnil, F., 1898. Les formes épitoques et l'évolution des cirratuliens. Annales de l'Université de Lyon, no. 39, 200 pp.Google Scholar
Cazaux, C., 1972. Développement larvaire d'Annélides Polychetes (Bassin d'Arcachon). Archives de zoologie expérimental et générate, 113, 71108.Google Scholar
Christie, G., 1981. The Reproductive Biology of Selected Offshore Benthic Polychaeta. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Clark, R. B., 1977. Reproduction, speciation and polychaete taxonomy. In Essays on Polychaetous Annelids in Memory of Dr Olga Hartman (ed. Reish, D. J. and Fauchald, K.), pp. 477501. Los Angeles: Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Curtis, M. A., 1977. Life cycles and population dynamics of marine benthic polychaetes from the Disko Bay area of West Greenland. Ophelia, 16, 958.Google Scholar
Dales, R. P., 1951. Notes on the reproduction and early development of the cirratulid Tharyx marioni (St. Joseph). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 30, 113117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, T., Ayala, F. J., Stebbins, G. L. & Valentine, J. W., 1977. Evolution. 572 pp. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K., 1972. Benthic polychaetous annelids from deep water off Western Mexico and adjacent areas in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Allan Hancock Monographs in Marine Biology, no. 7. 575 pp.Google Scholar
Fischer, A., 1975. The structure of symplasmic early oocytes and their enveloping sheath cells in the polychaete Platynereis dumerilii. Cell and Tissue Research, 160, 327343.Google Scholar
Franzén, Å., 1956. On spermatogenesis. Morphology of the spermatozoon and biology of fertilisation among invertebrates. Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala, 31, 355482.Google Scholar
Franzén, Å., 1958. On sperm morphology and acrosome filament formation in some Annelida, Echiuroidea and Tunicata. Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala, 33, 128.Google Scholar
Garwood, P. R., 1982. The marine fauna of the Cullercoats district, number 10. Polychaeta Sedentaria including Archiannelida. Report of the Dove Marine Laboratory, Cullercoats, Northumberland, no. 23, 270 pp.Google Scholar
George, J. D., 1963. Behavioural differences between the larval stages of Cirriformia tentaculata (Montagu) from Drake's Island (Plymouth Sound) and from Southampton Water. Nature, London, 199, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. D., 1964. The life history of the cirratulid worm, Cirriformia tentaculata, on an intertidal mudflat. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 44, 4765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, P. E., 1971. A comparative study of reproductive cycles in four polychaete species belonging to the Family Cirratulidae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 745769.Google Scholar
Grassle, J. F. & Grassle, J. P., 1974. Opportunistic life histories and genetic systems in marine benthic polychaetes. Journal of Marine Research, 32, 253284.Google Scholar
Grassle, J. P. & Grassle, J. F., 1976. Sibling species in the marine pollution indicator Capitella (Polychaeta). Science, New York, 192, 567569.Google Scholar
Grassle, J. F. & Grassle, J. P., 1977. Temporal adaptations in sibling species of Capitella. In Ecology of Marine Benthos (ed. Coull, B. C.), pp. 177189. University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Grassle, J. P., 1980. Polychaetesibling species. In Aquatic Oligochaete Biology (ed. Brinkhurst, R. O. and Cook, D. G.), pp. 2533. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuda, S. 1946. Studies on the development of Annelida, Polychaeta I. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University (Zoology), 9, 115219.Google Scholar
Olive, P. J. W., 1970. Reproduction of a Northumberland population of the polychaete Cirratulus cirratus. Marine Biology, 5, 259273.Google Scholar
Rice, S. A. & Simon, J. L., 1980. Intraspecific variation in the pollution indicator polychaete Polydora ligni (Spionidae). Ophelia, 19, 79115.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W., 1950. The development of Cirratulus cirratus (O. F. Müller). Report of the Dove Marine Laboratory, Cullercoats, Northumberland, no. 11, 720.Google Scholar