Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:38:20.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Study of Metridium senile (L.) var. dianthus (Ellis) and a Dwarf Variety of this Species occurring in the River Mersey, with a discussion on the Systematic Position of the Genus Metridium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Ruth Rawlinson
Ruth Rawlinson
Affiliation:
Herdman Scholar and Forbes Exhibitioner in the Department of Zoology, Liverpool University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A special study has been made of a small Metridiuni-like anemone found at Dingle, Liverpool, in comparison with the typical form of Metridium senile (L.) var. dianthus (Ellis).

2. Penicilli, formerly believed to be absent from the acontia of typical M. senile, have been discovered in abundance in the young, but rarely in the adults. In young and sexually mature specimens of the Dingle anemone they are also abundant.

3. There is close agreement between the anatomy of the Dingle form and the typical M. senile.

4. A considerable amount of variation occurs in the Dingle anemone, as in M. senile var. dianthus and M. marginatum, Mime-Edwards.

5. The resemblances and differences between the Dingle form and M. senile indicate that the former is a dwarf variety of the latter.

6. The discovery of an abundance of penicilli in the acontia of young typical M. senile and mature specimens of the Dingle variety, in conjunction with the great amount of variation in the genus Metridium, suggests that a reconsideration of the systematic position of the genus is necessary and would justify either the restriction of the family Metridiidæ to the single genus Metridium, or else the fusion of the Metridiidæ with the Sagartiidæ. The sum of the evidence appears to lie in favour of placing the genus in a family by itself.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , May 1934 , pp. 901 - 919
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Fraser, J. H.Observations on the fauna and constituents of an estuarine mud in a polluted area. Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., N.S., Vol. XVIII, No. 1, 1932.Google Scholar
2.Stephenson, T. A.On methods of reproduction as specific characters. Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., N.S., Vol. XVI, No. 1, 1929.Google Scholar
3.Gosse, P. H. Actinologia Britannica. 1860.Google Scholar
4.Torrey, H. B.Anemones, with discussion of variation in Metridium. Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci., Vol. IV, 1902.Google Scholar
5.Torrey, H. B.Observations on monogenesis in Metridium. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., Vol. I, Ser. 3, No. 10, 1898.Google Scholar
6.Elmhirst, R. Notes on the breeding and growth of marine animals in the Clyde Sea Area. Mar. Biol. Ass., West Scotland, Ann. Rep., 1922.Google Scholar
7.MarineBiologicalAssociation, Plymouth Marine Fauna, 1931.Google Scholar
8.McMurrich, J. F.Contributions on the Morphology of the Actinozoa. Journ. Morphology, Boston, Vol. IV, No. 3, 1891.Google Scholar
9.Gemmill, J. P.The development of the sea anemones Metridium dianthus (Ellis) and Adamsia palliata (Bohad). Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, Ser. B., Vol. 209, 1920.Google Scholar
10.Carlgren, O.Studien über Nordische Actinien I. K. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl. Bd. XXV, No. 10, Inaugural Dissertation, Upsala, 1893.Google Scholar
11.Stephenson, E. M.On the anatomy and relationships of new or little known British Actiniaria. Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., N.S., Vol. XIII, No. 4, 1925.Google Scholar
12.Stephenson, T. A.On a new British sea anemone. Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., N.S., Vol. XIII, No. 4, 1925.Google Scholar
13.Hahn, C. W.Dimorphism and regeneration in Metridium. J. Exper. Zool., Baltimore, Vol. II, No. 2, 1905.Google Scholar
14.Parker, G. H.The mesenteries and siphonoglyphs in Metridium marginatum Milne-Edwards. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv., Vol. XXX, No. 5, 1897.Google Scholar
15.Stephenson, T. A.On the classification of the Actiniaria. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., No. 256, 1920.Google Scholar
16.Stephenson, T. A.On the nematocysts of sea anemones. Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., N.S., Vol. XVI, No. 1, 1929.Google Scholar
17.Carlgren, o. The Godthaab Expedition, 1928. Zoantharia and Actiniaria, København, 1933.Google Scholar
18.Hickson, S. J.The Cambridge Natural History, Vol. I. London, 1906.Google Scholar
19.Carlgren, O.Die Ceriantharien, Zoantharien und Actiniarien des arktischen Gebietes. Fauna Arctica, Bd. 6, Jena, 1932.Google Scholar