Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:30:20.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Colour Polymorphism in Relation to Spatial Distribution in Some Intertidal Isopods in Northern Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Julio Arrontes
Julio Arrontes
Affiliation:
Laboratorio Ecologia, Departamento Biología de Organismos y Sistemas, Universidad de Oviedo, 33005-Oviedo, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The hypothesis that the level of chromatic polymorphism in intertidal isopods is related to their distribution and seasonal fluctuations in abundance was examined in northern Spain. Four species were used, Dynamene bidentata, Dynamene magnitorata, Cymodoce truncata and Cymodoce emarginata. Only for Dynamene species were results consistent with initial hypothesis. The most common colour morph in Dynamene bidentata was uniformis which is the most flexible phenotype, allowing effective concealment in most of the environments where the species occurs. Dynamene bidentata is the most abundant species of isopod in northern Spain, where it is abundant along the shore and throughout the year. Distribution of D. magnitorata, Cymodoce truncata and C. emarginata is restricted to macroalgal assemblages at low tidal levels. Seasonality is also important in D. magnitorata and C. truncata. The number of colour morphs and phenotypic diversity was larger in D. magnitorata than in D. bidentata. Only one colour morph was found in C. truncata and four in C. emarginata.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , November 1991 , pp. 749 - 758
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arrontes, J., 1990. Diet, food preference and digestive efficiency in intertidal isopods inhabiting macroalgae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 139, 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrontes, J. & Anadón, R., 1990a. Distribution of intertidal isopods in relation to geographical changes in macroalgal cover in the Bay of Biscay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 70, 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrontes, J. & Anadón, R., 1990b. Seasonal variation and population dynamics of isopods inhabiting intertidal macroalgae. Scientia Marina, 54, 231–240.Google Scholar
Bishop, J.A., 1969. Changes in the genetic constitution of a population of Sphaeroma rugicauda (Crustacea: Isopoda). Evolution, 23, 589–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bocquet, C. & Lejuez, R., 1963. Premières données génétiques sur le polychromatisme de l'isopode flabellifère Cymodoce truncata Leach. Bulletin Biologique de la France et de la Belgique, 97, 355–359.Google Scholar
Elkaim, B., Hoestlandt, H., Lejuez, R. & Plateaux, L., 1980. Sur le thermopreferendum de Sphaeroma serratum (F.) (Isopode Flabellifere). Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale, 121, 87–96.Google Scholar
Hairston, N.G., 1979. The adaptive significance of colour polymorphism in two species of Diaptomus (Copepoda). Limnology and Oceanography, 24, 15–37.Google Scholar
Heath, D.J., 1974. Seasonal changes in the frequency of the ‘yellow’ morph of the isopod, Sphaeroma rugicauda. Heredity, 32, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, D.J., 1975. Geographical variation in populations of the polymorphic isopod, Sphaeroma rugicauda. Heredity, 35, 99–107.Google Scholar
Hoestlandt, H., 1967. Action différentielle de la température sur la croissance des ovules des races polychromatiques de Sphaeroma serratum (Crustacé Isopode). Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire des Séances de l'Academie des Sciences. Paris, 264, 1053–1055.Google Scholar
Holdich, D.M., 1968. Reproduction, growth and bionomics of Dynamene bidentata (Crustacea: Isopoda). Journal of Zoology, 156, 137–153.Google Scholar
Holdich, D.M., 1969. Polychromatism in the genus Dynamene (Crustacea: Isopoda). Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli, 37, 18–27.Google Scholar
Holdich, D.M., 1976. A comparison of the ecology and life cycles of two species of littoral isopod. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 24, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khazaeli, A.A. & Heath, D.J., 1979. Colour polymorphism, selection and the sex ratio in the isopod Sphaeroma rugicauda (Leach). Heredity, 41, 187–199.Google Scholar
Lee, W.L., 1966a. Pigmentation of the marine isopod Idothea montereyensis Maloney. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 18, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, W.L., 1966b. Colour change and the ecology of the marine isopod Idothea (Pentidotea) montereyensis Maloney, 1933. Ecology, 47, 930–941.Google Scholar
Legrand-Hamelin, E., 1976. Sur le polychromatisme de l'isopode flabellifère Dynamene bidentata (Adams). III. Relations entre les gènes responsables des phénotypes Bimaculata et Lineata. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale, 117, 325–343.Google Scholar
Lejuez, R., 1966. Comparaison morphologique, biologique et génétique de quelques espéces du genre Sphaeroma Latreille (Isopodes Flabellifères). Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale, 107, 469–668.Google Scholar
Lejuez, R., 1979. Génétique des populations de Sphaeroma serratum (F.). XIV. Étude des populations de L'lle de Batz. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 20, 431–448.Google Scholar
Lejuez, R. & Rezig, M., 1979. Recherches sur Sphaeroma ephippium C. (Isopode Flabellifère) des côtes de Tunisie. III. Description et analyse génétique du polychromatisme. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale, 120, 313–336.Google Scholar
Lejuez, R. & Rezig, M., 1982. Polychromatisme de Sphaeroma serratum (F.). Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale, 122, 373–396.Google Scholar
Levins, R., 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maskell, M., Parkin, D.T. & Verspoor, E., 1977. Apostatic selection by sticklebacks upon a dimorphic prey. Heredity, 39, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimchen, T.E., 1979. Substratum heterogeneity, crypsis, and colour polymorphism in an inter-tidal snail (Littorina mariae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 57, 1070–1085.Google Scholar
Salemaa, H., 1978. Geographical variability in the colour polymorphism of ldotea baltica (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic. Hereditas, 88, 165–182.Google Scholar
Valentine, J.W., 1976. Genetic strategies of adaptation. In Molecular Evolution (Ed. Ayala, F.J.), pp. 78–94. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Valentine, J.W. & Ayala, F.J., 1978. Adaptive strategies in the sea. In Marine Organisms: Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution (ed. Battaglia, B. and Beardmore, J.A.), pp. 323–345. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, B.R. & Brusca, R.C., 1982. Fish predation: a preliminary study of its role in the zoogeography and evolution of shallow water idoteid isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda: Idoteidae). Journal of Biogeography, 9, 135–150.Google Scholar
West, D.A., 1964. Polymorphism in the isopod Sphaeroma rugicauda. Evolution, 18, 671–684.Google Scholar