Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:08:43.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Broods of British Mysidacea (Crustacea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. Mauchline
J. Mauchline
Affiliation:
The Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, P.O. Box no. 3, Oban, Argyll
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

All species of the Mysidacea (Crustacea) lay their eggs into a marsupium, thus allowing direct counts of brood sizes to be made. The different forms of the young stages in the marsupium are closely similar in all species. The most detailed embryological studies are those of Manton (1928) on Hemimysis lamornae (Couch), Wagner (1896) and Needham (1937) on Neomysis integer (Leach), and Nair (1939) on the tropical species Mesopodopsis orientalis (W. M. Tattersall). Kinne (1955) describes and figures the general body forms of the different stages of development of the larvae in the marsupium of Neomysis integer; Vannini (1930) examines the larvae of Leptomysis lingvura (G. O. Sars), while Kane (1904) illustrates the most advanced larval stage of Mysis relicta Lovén. The larvae of several non-British species have been described -Boreomysis arctica (Kröyer) by Jepsen (1965), Mysidium columbiae (Zimmer) by Davis (1966) and Neomysis intermedia Czerniavsky by Murano (1964b).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , November 1973 , pp. 801 - 817
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apstein, C., 1906. Lebensgeschichte von Mysis mixta der Ostsee. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 9, 241–60.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M., 1935. Metamysis strauchi (Czern.) Sars, Katamysis warpachowskyi Sars et Paramysis fe//en'(Sars)., Mysidacés nouveaux pour la faune de la Roumanie. Annales scientifiques de l'Universite de Jassy, 21, 468–85.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M., 1936. Hemimysis lamornae sb.sp. reducta et Hemimysis anomala dans les eaux Roumaines de la Mer Noire. Annales scientifiques de FUniversite de Jassy, 23, 70–93.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M., 1954. Crustacea: Mysidacea. Fauna Republicii populare romîlne, 4, Fasc. 3, 126 pp.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M., 1966. Contribution a l'étude du genre Leptomysis et description de trois taxons nouveaux:Leptomysis peresi n.sp., L. apiops banyulensis n.ssp. et L. burgii n.sp. Vie Milieu, 17, 121–42.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M., 1968 a. Afromysis guinensis n.sp. and Brasilomysis castroi n.g., n.sp. from the waters of the tropical Atlantic. Revue Roumaine de Biologie, Serie Zoologie, 13, 75–86.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M., 1968 b. Heteromysini nouveaux des eaux Cubaines: trois especes nouvelles de Heteromysis et Heteromysoid.es spongicola n.g., n.sp. Revue Rownaine de Biologie, Se'rie Zoologie, 13, 221–37.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M., 1968 c. Étude des quelques Leptomysini (Crustacea Mysidacea) des eaux du Brésil et de Cuba; description d'un genre et de cinq autres taxons nouveaux. Annali del Museo civico di storia naturale Giacomo Doria, 77, 231–49.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M., 1968 d. Contributions to the knowledge of the Gastrosaccinae psammobionte of the tropical America, with the description of a new genus (Bowmaniella n.g.) and three new species of its frame. Travaux du Museum d'histoire naturelle ‘Gr. Antipa’, 8, 355–73.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M., 1969. Contribution à la connaissance du genre Metamysidopsis W. Tattersall 1951. M. swifti n.sp.-M. mexicana n.n., confondues avec M. munda Zimmer. Révue Roumaine de Biologie, Série Zoologie, 14, 349–57.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M., 1970. New spongicolous Heteromysis of the Caribbean Sea (H. gomezi n.sp. and H. mariani n.sp.). Revue Roumaine de Biologie, Serie Zoologie, 15, pp. 11–16.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M. & Mayer, R., 1961. Malacostracés (Mysidacea, Euphausiacea, Decapoda, Stomatopoda) du plancton diurne de la Méditerranee, étude basée sur le matériel du Lamont Geological Observatory, Washington. Rapport et procés-verbaux des réunions. Commission Internationale pour l'exploration scientifique de la Mer Mediterranée, 16, 183–202.Google Scholar
Bacescu, M. & Orghidan, T., 1971. Antromysis cubanica n.sp. et Spelaeomysis nuniezi n.sp., My sis cavernicoles nouvelles de Cuba. Revue Roumaine de Biologie, Serie Zoologie, 16, 225–31.Google Scholar
Bary, B. M., 1956. Notes on ecology, systematics and development of some Mysidacea and Euphausiacea (Crustacea) from New Zealand. Pacific Science, 10, 431–67.Google Scholar
Blegvad, H., 1922. On the biology of some Danish gammarids and mysids. Report of the Danishi Biological Station to the Board of Agriculture, 28, 1–103.Google Scholar
Brattegard, T., 1969. Marine biological investigations in the Bahamas. 10. Mysidacea from shallow water in the Bahamas and southern Florida. Part I. Sarsia, 39, 17–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brattegard, T., 1970. Marine biological investigations in the Bahamas. 11. Mysidacea from shallow water in the Bahamas and southern Florida. Part II. Sarsia, 41, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutter, R. I. & Theilacker, G. H., 1971. Ecological efficiency of a pelagic mysid shrimp; estimates from growth, energy budget, and mortality studies. Fishery Bulletin of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. 69, 93–115.Google Scholar
Davis, C. C., 1966. A study of the hatching process in aquatic invertebrates XXII. Multiple membrane shedding in Mysidium columbiae (Zimmer) (Crustacea: Mysidacea). Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean, 16, 124–31.Google Scholar
Fage, L., 1941. Mysidacea. Lophogastrida - I. Dana Reports, 4, No. 19, 1–52.Google Scholar
Fage, L., 1942. Mysidacea. Lophogastrida - II. Dana Reports, 4, No. 23, 1–67.Google Scholar
Fage, L. & Monod, T., 1936. La faune marine du Jameo de Agua, lac souterraine de l'lle de Lanzarote (Canaries). Archives de zoologie experimentale et generate, 28, 97–113.Google Scholar
Genovese, S., 1956. Su due Misidacei dei laghi di Ganzirri e di Faro (Messina). Bollettino di zoologia, pubblicato dalV Unione zoologica italiana, 23, 177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heubach, W., 1969. Neomysis awatschensis in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Estuary. Limnology and Oceanography, 14, 533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenigman, J., 1963. Mysidacea de l'expedition ‘Hvar’ (1948–1949) dans l'Adriatique. Rapport et procés-verbaux des réunions. Commission internationale pour l'exploration scientifique de la Mer Méditerranée, 17, 603–16.Google Scholar
Jepsen, J., 1965. Marsupial development of Boreomysis arctica (Kroyer, 1861). Sarsia, 20, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, W. F. Dev., 1904. Further captures of Mysis relicta in Ireland. Irish Naturalist, 13, 107–9.Google Scholar
Kinne, O., 1955. Neomysis vulgaris Thompson, eine autokologisch-biologische Studie. Biologisches Zentralblatt, 74, 160–202.Google Scholar
Labat, R., 1957. Observations sur le cycle annuel et la sexualité de Paramysis nouveli et Paramysis bacescoi (Crustacés Mysidacés) dans la région de Roscorf. Travaux de la Station biologique de Roscoff, 8, Suppl. 9, No. 40, 12.Google Scholar
Macquart-Moulin, C., 1965. Les mysidaces benthoplanctoniques du Golfe de Marseille. Recueil des travaux de la Station marine d'Endoume, Faculté des sciences de Marseille, 54, 129–253.Google Scholar
Manton, S. M., 1928. On the embryology of a mysid crustacean, Hemimysis lamornae. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 216, 363–463. 53–2Google Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1965. Breeding and fecundity of Praunus inermis [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 45, 663–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1967. The biology of Schistomysis spiritus [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 47, 383–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1968. The biology of Erythrops serrata and E. elegans [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 455–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1969. The biology of Leptomysis gracilis and L. lingvura [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 379–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1970 a. The biology of Schistomysis ornata [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1970 b. The biology of Mysidopsis gibbosa, M. didelphys and M. angusta [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 381–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1971 a. The biology of Paramysis arenosa [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 339–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1971 b. The biology of Neomysis integer [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 347–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1971 c. The biology of Praunus flexuosus and P. neglectus [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 641–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1971 d. The biology of Schistomysis kervillei [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 653–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1971 e. Rare species of Mysidacea [Crustacea] from the west coast of Scotland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 799–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1971 f. Seasonal occurrence of mysids [Crustacea] and evidence of social behaviour. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 809–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1972. The biology of bathypelagic organisms, especially Crustacea. Deep-Sea Research, 19, 753–80.Google Scholar
Murano, M. 1964 a. Fisheries biology of a marine relict mysid Neomysis intermedia Czerniawsky. III. Lifecycle, with special reference to the reproduction of the mysid. Aquiculture (Japan), 12, 19–30.Google Scholar
Murano, M., 1964 b. Fisheries biology of a marine relict mysid Neomysis intermedia Czerniawsky. IV. Lifecycle, with special reference to growth. Aquiculture {Japan), 12, 109–17.Google Scholar
Nair, K. B., 1939. The reproduction, oogenesis and development of Mesopodopsis orientalis Tatt. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, 9, 175–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakazawa, K., 1910. Notes on Japanese Schizopoda. Annotationes zoologicae japonenses, 7, 247–61.Google Scholar
Needham, A. E., 1937. Some points in the development of Neomysis vulgaris. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 79, 559–88.Google Scholar
Nouvel, H., 1940. Observations sur la sexualité d'un Mysidacé, Heteromysis armoricana n.sp. Bulletin de l'Institut oceanographique, Monaco, 789, 1–11.Google Scholar
Nouvel, H., 1954. Description d'un Mysidacé nouveau de Ceylan Mesopodopsis zeylanica n.sp. Zoologische mededeelingen, 33, 33–9.Google Scholar
Nouvel, H., 1965. Mysidacés récoltes par S. Frontier à Nosy-Bé. II. Description de deux Mysini appartenant aux genres Diamysis et Acanthomysis. Bulletin de la Société d'histoire naturelle de Toulouse, 100, 451–64.Google Scholar
Nouvel, H., 1967. Mysidacés recoltes par S. Frontier à Nosy-Bé. IV. Mesacanthomysis pygmaea n. gen., n.sp. et Anisomysis hanseni n.sp. Bulletin de la Société d'histoire naturelle de Toulouse, 103, 105–21.Google Scholar
Nouvel, H., 1971. Mysidacés récoltes par S. Frontier à Nosy-Bé. VI. Anchialina typica (Kröyer) avec distinction de deux sous-espéces, et Anchialina latifrons n.sp. Bulletin de la Société d'histoire naturelle de Toulouse, 107, 325–38.Google Scholar
Pillai, K. & Mariamma, T., 1964. On a new lepidomysid from India. Crustaceana, 7, 113–24.Google Scholar
Tattersall, O. S., 1955. Mysidacea. ‘Discovery’ Report, 28, 1–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersall, O. S., 1957. Report on a small collection of Mysidacea from the Sierra Leone Estuary together with a survey of the genus Rhopalophthalmus Illig and a description of a new species of Tenagomysis from Lagos, Nigeria. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 129, 81–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersall, O. S., 1962. Report on a collection of Mysidacea from South Africa off-shore and coastal waters (1957–1959) and from Zanzibar (1961). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 139, 221–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersall, O. S., 1965. The fauna of the Ross Sea. 4. Mysidacea. Bulletin of the New Zealand Department of Scientific Industrial Research, 167, 1–35.Google Scholar
Tattersall, W. M., 1922. Indian Mysidacea. Record of the Indian Museum, 24, 445–504.Google Scholar
Tattersall, W. M., 1937. New species of mysidacid crustaceans. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 19, No. 26, 1–28.Google Scholar
Tattersall, W. M., 1951. A review of the Mysidacea of the United States National Museum. Bulletin United States National Museum, 201, 1–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersall, W. M. & Tattersall, O. S., 1951. The British Mysidacea, 460 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Vannini, E., 1930. Nota sulle forme larvali di Leptomysis lingvura del Golfo di Napoli. Pubblicazioni della Stazione zoologica di Napoli, 9, 285–96.Google Scholar
Wagner, J., 1896. Einige Beobachtungen über die embryonale Entwicklung von Neomysis vulgaris, var. baltica Czern. Trudy Imperatorskago obshchestva S.-Peterburgskago estestvoispytatelei, 26, 177–221.Google Scholar
Wigley, R. L. & Burns, B. R., 1971. Distribution and biology of mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from the Atlantic coast of the United States in the NMFS Woods Hole collection. Fishery Bulletin of the National Oceanic and atmospheric Administration, U.S., 69, 717–46.Google Scholar