Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:24:38.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biometrical Changes During Growth Of Isolated Individuals Of Balanus Improvisus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

E. R. Furman
Affiliation:
Division of Ecology, Department of Zoology, University of Helsinki, P. Rautatiek, 13 00100, Helsinki, Finland.
D. J. Crisp
Affiliation:
School of Animal Biology, UCNW, Menai Bridge, LL59 5EY

Extract

Previous work on barnacle biometry has mainly been concerned with the opercular valves, whose shape is often an important taxonomic character (Barnes & Healy, 1969; Henry & McLaughlin, 1975). The well-known change in shape whereby columnar individuals are produced as a result of crowding has also been described by many workers (e.g. Trusheim, 1932; Barnes & Powell, 1950; Subklew, 1969; Crisp & Bourget, 1985). The influence of environmental variables on the shape of the barnacle shell as a whole has been little studied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, H. & Barnes, M., 1961. Salinity and the biometry of Balanus improvisus. Commentationes Biologicae, 24, 17.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. & Barnes, M., 1962. The distribution and general ecology of Balanus balanoides together with some observations on Balanus improvisus in the waters around the coasts of Denmark, southern Sweden and north-east Germany. Acta Universitatis Lundensis, 58(8), 41 pp.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. & Healy, M.J.R., 1969. Biometrical studies on some common cirripedes. II. Discriminant analysis of measurements on the scuta and terga of Balanus balanus (L.), B. crenatus Brug., B. improvisus Darwin, B.glandula Darwin and B. amphitrite stutsburi Darwin (B. pallidus stutsburi). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 4, 5170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. & Powell, H.T., 1950. The development, general morphology and subsequent elimination of barnacle populations, Balanus crenatus and B. balanoides, after a heavy initial settlement. Journal of Animal Ecology, 19, 175179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourget, E. & Crisp, D.J., 1975. Factors affecting deposition of the shell in Balanus balanoides (L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 231249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costlow, J.D. & Bookhout, C.G., 1957. Body growth versus shell growth in Balanus improvisus. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole Mass., 113, 224232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D.J. & Bourget, E., 1985. Growth in barnacles. Advances in Marine Biology, 22, 200244.Google Scholar
Crisp, D.J. & Patel, B.S., 1967. The influence of the surface contour of the substratum on the shapes of barnacles. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Crustacea, pt 2, Ernakulam, Bangalore, 1965, pp. 612629. Mandapam Camp: Marine Biological Association of India.Google Scholar
Henry, D.P. & McLaughlin, P.A., 1975. The barnacles of the Balanus amphitrite complex (Cirripedia, Thoracica). Zoologische Verhandelingen, 141, 254 pp.Google Scholar
Ricker, W.E. 1973. Linear regressions in fishery research. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 30, 409434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivey, H.R., 1988. Shell morphometry in barnacles: quantification of shape and shape change in Balanus. Journal of Zoology, 216, 265294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subklew, H.-J., 1969. Zur Okologie von Balanus improvisus. Limnologica, 7, 147.Google Scholar
Trusheim, F., 1932. Palaontologisches Bemerkenwertes aus der Okologie rezenter Nordsee-Balaniden. Senckenbergiana, 14, 7087.Google Scholar