Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:56:26.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Biology of Eurydice Pulchra [Crustacea: Isopoda]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Susan Fish
Susan Fish
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Eurydice pulchra Leach is a common intertidal isopod of sandy beaches. Its occurrence around the British Isles has been described by Jones & Naylor (1967), and Salvat (1966) has described the life cycle and intertidal distribution of the species on the west coast of France. There are several records of its intertidal distribution in Britain (Elmhirst, 1931; Pirrie, Bruce & Moore, 1932; Rees, 1939; Watkin, 1942; Brady, 1942; Holme, 1949; Southward, 1953; Colman & Segrove, 1955; Perkins, 1956; M. Ladle, unpublished) and these suggest that its distribution is variable. Watkin (1942) found that the population structure of E. pulchra in late March and early April was comprised of ‘two distinct groups’ and similar findings were made in July by Scott (1960). The present study was made on a large intertidal population in the sands of the Dovey Estuary, Cardinganshire.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , August 1970 , pp. 753 - 768
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brady, F., 1942. The distribution of the fauna of some intertidal sands and muds on the Northumberland coasr. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 12, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Calman, W. T., 1909. A Treatise on Zoology, Part 7, Fasc. 3, 346 pp., ed. Sir, Ray Lankaster. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Colman, J. S. & Segrove, F., 1955. The fauna living in Stoupe Beck Sands, Robin Hood's Bay (Yorkshire, North Riding). J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 24, pp. 426–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davant, P. & Salvat, B., 1961. Recherches écologiques sur la macrofaune inter-cotidale du bassin d'Arcachon. Vie Milieu, T. 12, pp. 405–71.Google Scholar
Elmhirst, R., 1931. Studies on the Scottish marine fauna. The Crustacea of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 51, pp. 169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsman, B., 1944. Beobachtungen über Jaera albifrons Leach an der schwedischen Westküste. Ark. Zool., Bd. 35 A, NO. 11, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Harding, J. P., 1949. The use of probability paper for the graphical analysis of poly-modal frequency distributions. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 141–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdich, D. M., 1968. Reproduction, growth and bionomics of Dynamene bidentata (Crustacea: Isopoda). J. Zool., Lond., Vol. 156, pp. 137–53.Google Scholar
Holme, N. A., 1949. The fauna of the sand and mud banks near the mouth of the Exe Estuary. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 189–237.Google Scholar
Howes, N. H., 1939. Observations on the biology and post-embryonic development of Idotea viridis (Slabber) [Isopoda, Valvifera] from New England Creek, south east Essex. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 23, pp. 279–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. P., 1955. Biological observations on the isopod Sphaeroma hookeri Leach. Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren., Bd. 117, pp. 305–39.Google Scholar
Jones, D. A., 1970. Population densities and breeding in Eurydice pulchra and Eurydice affinis in Britain. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 50, pp. 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. A., & Naylor, E., 1967. The distribution of Eurydice (Crustacea: Isopoda) in British Waters, including E. affinis new to Britain. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 47, pp. 373–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjennerud, J., 1950. Ecological observations on Idotea neglecta G. O. Sars. Univ. Bergen Årb., Vol. 7, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Menzies, R. J., 1954. The comparative biology of reproduction in the wood boring isopod crustacean, Limnoria. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv., Vol. 112, pp. 263–388.Google Scholar
Naylor, E., 1955 a. The comparative external morphology and revised taxonomy of the British species of Idotea. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 34, pp. 467–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, E., 1955 b. The life cycle of the isopod Idotea emarginata (Fabricus). J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 24, pp. 270–81.Google Scholar
Perkins, E. J., 1956. The fauna of a sand bank in the mouth of the Dee Estuary. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Vol. 98, Ser. 9, pp. 112–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirrie, M. E., Bruce, J. R., & Moore, H. B., 1932. A quantitative study of the sandy beach at Port Erin. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 18, pp. 279–96.Google Scholar
Rees, C. B., 1939. Notes on the ecology of the sandy beaches of North Donegal. Proc. R. Ir. Acad., Vol. 45, pp. 215–29.Google Scholar
Salvat, B., 1966. Eurydice pulchra (Leach 1815), Eurydice affinis (Hansen 1905), [Isopodes Cirolanidae]—taxonomie, éthologie, écologie, répartition verticale, et cycle reproducteur. Act. Soc. linn. Bordeaux, T. 103, Sér. A 1, pp. 1–77.Google Scholar
Saudray, Y. & Lemercier, A., 1960. Observations sur le développement des œufs de Ligia oceanica Fabr. Crustacé Isopode oniscoïde. Bull. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, No. 1162, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Scott, A., 1960. The fauna of the Sandy Beach, Village Bay, St. Kilda: a dynamic relationship. Oikos, Vol. 2, pp. 153–60.Google Scholar
Southward, A. J., 1953. The fauna of some sandy and muddy shores in the south of the Isle of Man. Proc. Trans. Lpool biol. Soc., Vol. 59, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1942. The macrofauna of the intertidal sand of Kames Bay, Millport, Buteshire. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 60, pp. 543–61.Google Scholar