Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:33:30.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biological observations on young scallops, Pecten maximus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Dan Minchin
Dan Minchin
Affiliation:
Fisheries Research Centre, Department of the Marine, Abbotstown, Dublin 15, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The biology of young scallops Pecten maximus (Mollusca: Bivalvia) was examined using SCUBA diving. Within shallow and sheltered bays settlement took place near adult populations. Surfaces to which scallops attached were generally free of silt; these included algae, invertebrate tests and inorganic materials. Detachment could take place amongst individuals of 1 mm; however, in sheltered bays most remained attached until 4–13 mm. Following detachment scallops recessed in sediment. They were subject to dispersal by water turbulence and swimming induced by sea-stars. There was evidence to suggest high mortality from crab and sea-star predation during the summer and autumn.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , November 1992 , pp. 807 - 819
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, F.T. Jr, 1953. Observations on the early life history of the giant scallop (Pecten magellanicus). Research Bulletin. Department of Sea and Shore Fisheries, Maine, no. 14, 7 pp.Google Scholar
Baird, R.H., 1958. On the swimming behaviour of scallops (Pecten maximus L.). Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 33, 67–71.Google Scholar
Baird, R.H. & Gibson, F.A., 1956. Underwater observations on scallop (Pecten maximus L.) beds. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 35, 555–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, A.R., Paul, J.D. & Hoogesteger, J.N., 1980. Spat settlement of the scallops, Chlamys opercularis (L.) and Pecten maximus (L.) on artificial collectors. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, M.F., 1976. Aspects of the biology of the New Zealand scallop, Pecten novaezelandiae Reeve 1853, in the Marlborough Sounds. PhD thesis, University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Caddy, J.F., 1972. Progressive loss of byssus attachment with size in the sea scallop, Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 9, 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickie, L.M. & Medcof, J.C., 1963. Causes of mass mortalities of scallops (Placopecten magellanicus) in the southwestern Gulf of St Lawrence. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 20, 451–4852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggleston, D., 1962. Spat of the scallop (Pecten maximus (L.)) from off Port Erin, Isle of Man. Report. Marine Biological Station, Port Erin, 74, 29–32.Google Scholar
Elmhirst, R., 1945. Clam fishing in the Firth of Clyde. Transactions of the Buteshire Natural History Society, 13, 113–116.Google Scholar
Gibson, F.A., 1953. Tagging of escallops (Pecten maximus, L.) in Ireland. Journal du Conseil, 19, 204–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, F.A., 1956. Scallops (Pecten maximus L.) in Irish waters. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society, 27, 253–271.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J., 1971. Muscular mechanics and the ontogeny of swimming in scallops. Palaeontology, 14, 61–94.Google Scholar
Le Pennec, M., 1974. Une nouvelle forme d'élevage marin: la pectiniculture. Penn ar Bed, 2(77), 328–341.Google Scholar
Mason, J., 1957. The age and growth of the scallop, Pecten maximus (L.) in Manx waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 36, 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J., 1958. The breeding of the scallop Pecten maximus (L.), in Manx waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 653–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J., 1983. Scallop and queen fisheries in the British Isles. Farnham: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
Minchin, D., 1981. The escallop Pecten maximus in Mulroy Bay. Fisheries Bulletin, Dublin, no. 1, 21 pp.Google Scholar
Minchin, D., 1983. Predation on young Pecten maximus (L.) (Bivalvia) by the anemone Anthopleura ballii (Cocks). Journal of Molluscan Studies, 49, 228–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchin, D., 1991a. Observations on shell colour in the scallop, Pecten maximus (L.). Journal of Conchology, 34, 41–46.Google Scholar
Minchin, D., 1991b. Decapod predation and the sowing of the scallop, Pecten maximus (Linnaeus, 1758). In Scallop biology and culture (ed. S.E., Shumway and P.A., Sandifer). World Aquaculture Society.Google Scholar
Minchin, D. & Mathers, N.F., 1982. The escallop, Pecten maximus(L.), in Killary Harbour. Irish Fisheries Investigations. Series B, no. 25, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Motoda, S., 1977. Biology and artificial propagation of Japanese scallop. In Proceedings of the Second Soviet-Japan Joint Symposium on Aquaculture, Moscow (ed. S., Motoda) pp. 75–120. Tokyo: Tokai.Google Scholar
Murphy, E.J., 1986. An investigation of the population dynamics of the exploited scallop, Pecten maximus (L.), in the North Irish Sea. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Olsen, A.M., 1955. Underwater studies on the Tasmanian commercial scallop, Notovola meridionalis (Tate) (Lamellibranchiata: Pectinidae). Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 6, 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, P.S., 1976. Check-list of British marine algae. Third revision. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 527–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, J.D., 1980. Upper temperature tolerance and the effects of temperature on byssus attachment in the queen scallop, Chlamys opercularis (L.). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 46, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Round, F.E., Sloane, J.F., Ebling, F.J. & Kitching, J.A., 1961. The ecology of Lough Ine. X. The hydroid Sertularia operculata (L.) and its associated flora and fauna: effects of transference to sheltered water. Journal of Ecology, 49, 617–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurdsson, J.B., Titman, C.W. & Davies, P.A., 1976. The dispersal of young post-larval bivalve molluscs by byssal threads. Nature, London, 262, 386–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, C.W., 1971. Fish-like crypsis in swimming monomyaria. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 39, 371–376.Google Scholar
Thomas, G.E. & Gruffydd, Ll.D., 1971. The types of escape reactions elicited in the scallop Pecten maximus by selected sea-star species. Marine Biology, 10, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventilla, R.F., 1982. The scallop industry in Japan. Advances in Marine Biology, 20, 309–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkens, L.A., 1991. Neurobiology and behaviour of the scallop. In Scallops: biology, ecology and aquaculture (ed. S.E., Shumway), pp. 429–469. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.H., 1987. Spawning of Pecten maximus (Pectinidae) and the artificial collection of juveniles in two bays in the west of Ireland. Aquaculture, 61, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, G., 1964. Studies on the propagation of the scallop, Patinopecten yessoensis (Jay), in Mutsu Bay. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Translation Series, no. 1054, 64 pp.Google Scholar