Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:21:26.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Behavioural Basis of Predator-Prey Size Relationships Between Shrimp (Crangon Crangon) and Juvenile Plaice (Pleuronectes Platessa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R.N. Gibson
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, PO Box 3, Oban, Argyll, Scotland, PA34 4AD
M.C. Yin
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, PO Box 3, Oban, Argyll, Scotland, PA34 4AD Aquaculrure Department, Shanghai Fisheries University, 334, Jun Gong Road, Shanghai 200090, People's Republic of China
L. Robb
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, PO Box 3, Oban, Argyll, Scotland, PA34 4AD

Extract

The shrimp, Crangon crangon (L.) (Crustacea: Crangonidae), is a significant predator of the smallest sizes of plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L. (Teleostei: Pleuronectidae), during and immediately after the fish settle on sandy beaches when predation rate is strongly dependent on the size of both the predator and the prey. Laboratory experiments showed that this size-dependency is caused principally by the superior escape capabilities of larger fish once captured rather than differences in the ability of different sizes of shrimps to capture their prey. Fish that escape after capture are often wounded and some of these wounds may subsequently be fatal. Many shrimps capture and eat fish that are larger than their stomach volume resulting in long handling times and low prey profitabilities. For all sizes of shrimps used (36–65 mm total length) prey profitability (mg prey ingested min−1) increases with decreasing fish length.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Adhub, A.H.Y. & Naylor, E., 1975. Emergence rhythms and tidal migrations in the brown shrimp Crangon crangon (L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 801810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, A.D. & Gibson, R.N., 1993. The effect of sand and light on predation of juvenile plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) by fishes and crustaceans. Journal of Fish Biology, 43, 837845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, G.P. & Weihs, D., 1978. The hydrodynamics of rheotaxis in the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). Journal of Experimental Biology, 75, 147169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batty, R.S., 1983. Observation of fish larvae in the dark with television and infra-red illumination. Marine Biology, 76, 105107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, W.J., 1991. Searching behaviour. The behavioural ecology of finding resources. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Curio, E., 1976. The ethology of predation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, J.A., 1991. Interactions between predators and prey. In Behavioural ecology, 3rd ed. (ed. J.R., Krebs and N.B., Davies), pp. 169196. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Formanowicz, D.R. Jr, 1982. Foraging tactics of larvae of Dytiscus verticalis (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae): the assessment of prey density. Journal of Animal Ecology, 51, 757767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R.N. & Robb, L., 1992. The relationship between body size, sediment grain size and the burying ability of juvenile plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L. Journal of Fish Biology, 40, 771778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagerman, L., 1970. Locomotory activity patterns of Crangon vulgaris (Fabricius) (Crustacea, Natantia). Ophelia, 8, 255266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kils, U., 1979. Schwimmverhalten, Schwimmleistung und Energiebilanz des antarktischen Krills, Euphausia superba. Ergebnisse derl. deutschen Antarktis-Expedition des FFS ‘Walther Herivig’ im Südsommer 1977/78. PhD thesis, University of Kiel.Google Scholar
Lockwood, S.J. & Daly, C. De B., 1975. Further observations on the effects of preservation in 4% neutral formalin on the length and weight of 0-group flatfish. Journal du Conseil, 36, 170175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, R.L., 1989. Search modes of birds and lizards: evidence for alternative movement patterns. American Naturalist, 133, 654670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinn, E.H. & Ansell, A.D., 1993. The effect of particle size on the burying ability of the brown shrimp Crangon crangon. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 73, 365377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, J.A., Crowder, L.B. & Rose, K.A., 1993. Interactions between size-structured predator and prey populations: experimental test and model comparison. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 122, 481491.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seikai, T., Kinoshita, I. & Tanaka, M., 1993. Predation By Crangonid Shrimp On Juvenile Japanese Flounder Under Laboratory Conditions. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 59, 321326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sih, A., 1980. Optimal foraging: partial consumption of prey. American Naturalist, 116, 281290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiews, K., 1970. Synopsis of biological data on the common shrimp Crangon crangon (Linnaeus, 1758). FAO Fisheries Reports, no. 57, 11671224.Google Scholar
Veer, H.W. Van Der & Bergman, M.J.N., 1987. Predation by crustaceans on a newly settled 0-group plaice Pleuronectes platessa population in the western Wadden Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 35, 203215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, P.W., 1986. Locomotion and predator-prey relationships. In Predator-prey relationships (ed. M.E., Feder and G.V., Lauder), pp. 2441. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Witting, D.A. & Able, K.W., 1993. Effects of body size on probability of predation for juvenile summer and winter flounder based on laboratory experiments. Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, DC, 91, 577581.Google Scholar
Witting, D.A. & Able, K.W., 1995. Predation by sevenspine bay shrimp, Crangon septemspinosa, on winter flounder, Pleuronectes americanus, during settlement: laboratory observations. Marine Ecology Progress Series, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar