Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:36:06.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Behaviour, Survival and Respiration of the Cockles Cerastoderma Edule and C. Glaucum in Air

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. R. Boyden
C. R. Boyden
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Comparative Physiology, Queen Mary College, London E 1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Aspects of the physiology of the two cockles Cerastoderma edule (L.) and C. glaucum (Poiret) in air have been investigated. Both cockles exhibit bradycardia during exposure and are similarly tolerant of anoxic conditions, but C. edule survives longer in air than C. glaucum. This is accounted for by the fact that C. edule displays a behaviour pattern of valve movements upon emersion which allows air-breathing. Oxygen uptake rates of this cockle measured in air lie close to the lowest rates recorded in water, and are considered to approximate to a basal or quiescent level. C. glaucum does not air-breathe and is restricted to lowest shore levels. Values for ‘maximal’ levels of oxygen uptake in water have also been obtained together with estimates of metabolic scope for the cockle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , August 1972 , pp. 661 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, H. & Barnes, M. 1957. Resistance to desiccation in intertidal barnacles. Science, N.Y., N.S., Vol. 126, p. 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. & Finlayson, D. M. & Piatigorsky, J. 1963. The effect of desiccation and anaerobic conditions on the behaviour, survival and general metabolism of three common cirripedes. J. Anim. Ecol, Vol. 32, pp. 233–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. & Reese, E. S. 1960. Behaviour of the stalked intertidal barnacle Pollicipes polymerus (J. B. Sowerby) with special reference to its ecology and distribution. J. Anim. Ecol, Vol. 29, pp. 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyden, C. R. 1969. Ecology of the cockle Cardium glaucum (Bruguière) Essex Nat., Vol. 32, pp. 223–6.Google Scholar
Boyden, C. R. 1971a. A comparative study of the reproductive cycles of the cockles Cerastoderma edule and C. glaucum. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 51, pp. 605–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyden, C. R. 1971b. A note on the nomenclature of two British cockles. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), Vol., 50, pp. 307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyden, C. R. & Russell, P. J. C. 1972. The distribution and habitat of the brackish water cockle Cardium (Cerastoderma) glaucum in the British Isles. J. Anim Ecol, Vol. 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braefield, A. E. & Chapman, G. 1967. The respiration of Pteroides griseum (Bohadsch) a pennatulid coelenterate. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 46, pp. 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catlett, R. H. 1971. Rapid acclimation and oxygen consumption of the rough limpet Acmea Scabra. Life Sci., Vol. 10, Part II, pp. 355–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, H. A. 1956. A preliminary study of growth rate in cockles (Cardium edule L.) in relation to commercial exploitation. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer., Vol. 22, pp. 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, W. A. M. & Newell, R. C. 1965. Ciliary activity and oxygen uptake in Branchiostoma lanceolatum (Pallas). J. exp. Biol., Vol. 43, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, P. S. 1966. Physiological ecology of Patella. I. The effect of body size and temperature on metabolic rate. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 46, pp. 647–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. S. 1969. Physiological ecology of Patella. III. Dessication effects. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 49, pp. 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. S. 1967. The Marine Fauna of the Blackwater Estuary and adjacent waters, Essex. Essex Nat., Vol. 32, pp. 2–61.Google Scholar
Franklin, A. 1972. The cockle and its fisheries. Lab. Leafl. Fish. Lab. Lowestoft., N.S., No. 26.Google Scholar
Franklin, A. & Pickett, G. D. 1968. Cockle resources of the Wash 1967–8. Shellfish inf. Leafl., No. 11.Google Scholar
Fry, F. E. J. 1947. Effect of environment on Animal activity. Publs Ont. Fish. Res. Lab., No. 55.Google Scholar
Grainger, F. & Newell, G. E. 1965. Aerial respiration in Balanus balanoides. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 45, pp. 469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halcrow, K. & Boyd, C. M. 1967. The oxygen consumption and swimming activity of the amphipod Gammarus oceanicus at different temperature. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Vol. 23, PP. 233–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, M. M. & Trueman, E. R. 1967. The effect of exposure on the heart rate of the mussel Mytilus edulis L. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Vol. 21, pp. 171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Høpner-Petersen, G. 1958. Notes on the growth and biology of the different Cardium species in the Danish brackish water areas. Meddr. Danm. Fisk-og. Havunders, Bd. 2, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Kreger, D. 1940. On the ecology of Cardium edule L. Archs néerl. Zool., Vol. 4, pp. 157–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, I. 1956. Differences in density and growth in a cockle population in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Archs néerl. Zool., Vol. 12, pp. 351–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A. 1941. The Comparative Physiology of Respiratory Mechanisms. William J. Cooper Fundation Lectures, 1939. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenzler, E. J. 1961. Structure and energy flow of a mussel population in a Georgia Salt marsh. Limnol. Oceanogr., Vol. 6, pp. 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lent, C. M. 1968. Air gaping by the ribbed mussel Modiolus demissus (Dillwyn): effects and adaptive significance. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 134, pp. 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linke, O. 1939. Die Biota des Jadebusenwattes. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters, Vol. 1, pp. 201–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangum, C. P. & Sassaman, C. 1969. Temperature sensitivity of active and resting metabolism in a polychaetous annelid. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Vol. 30, pp. 111–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcfarland, W. N. & Pickens, P. E. 1965. The effects of season, temperature, and salinity on standard and active oxygen consumption of the grass shrimp, Palaemontes vulgaris (say), Can. J. Zool., Vol. 43, pp. 571–85.Google Scholar
Micallef, H. 1967. Aerial and aquatic respiration of certain Trochids. Experientia, Vol. 23, p. 52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Micallef, H. & Bannister, W. H. 1967. Aerial and aquatic oxygen consumption of Monodonta turbinata (Mollusca, Gastropoda). J. Zool., Vol. 151, pp. 479–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, B. S. 1970. The tidal rhythm and rhythm of feeding and digestion in Cardium edule. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 50, pp. 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, G. E. 1954. The marine fauna of Whitstable. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 12, Vol. 7, pp. 321–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R. C. 1970. Biology of Intertidal Animals, 555 pp. London: Lagos Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Newell, R. C. & Northcroft, H. R. 1967. A re-interpretation of the effect of temperature on the metabolism of certain marine invertebrates. J. Zool., Vol. 151, pp. 277–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. H. 1926. On the rate of growth of Cardium edule. I. Experimental observations. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 14, pp. 239–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, P. J. C. 1971. A reappraisal of the geographical distribution of the cockles Cardium edule L. and G. glaucum Bruguière. J. Conch., Vol. 27, pp. 225–34.Google Scholar
Sandison, E. E. 1966. The oxygen consumption of some intertidal gastropods in relation to zonation. J. Zool., Vol. 149, pp. 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlieper, C. 1957. Comparative study of Asterias rubens and Mytilus edulis from the North Sea (30‰) and the Western Baltic Sea (15‰). Année biol. (fase 3–4), Vol. 33, pp. 117–27.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1961. Statistical Methods applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology. Iowa State University Press, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Spooner, G. M. & Moore, H. B. 1940. The ecology of the Tamar Estuary. VI. An account of the macrofauna of the intertidal muds. J. mar. biol. Ass., U.K., Vol. 24, 283–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thandrup, H. M. 1935. Beiträge zur Ökologie de Wattenfauna auf experimenteller Grundlage. Meddr. Danm. Fisk-og. Havunders, Bd 10 (2), pp. 1–125.Google Scholar
Trueman, E. R. 1967. Activity and heart rate of bivalve molluscs in their natural habitat. Nature, Lond., Vol. 214, pp. 832–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trueman, E. R. & Lowe, G. A. 1971. The effect of temperature and littoral exposure on the heart rate of a bivalve mollusc Isognomon alatus, in tropical conditions. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Vol. 38A, pp. 555–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar