Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:13:39.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Axial Skeleton and Musculature in the Thorax of the Hermit Crab, Pagurus Bernhardus [Anomura:Paguridae]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. L. C. Pilgrim
R. L. C. Pilgrim
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During an examination of the distribution and relationships of muscle receptor organs in the hermit crab, Pagurus bernhardus (Pilgrim, in preparation), it was found that not enough was known about the muscular anatomy of the animal for the experimental work to be described satisfactorily. This paper is therefore an account of the anatomy appropriate to a better understanding of the receptor organs. In the preparation of this account, it was necessary to examine the skeleton of the animal in great detail, since a knowledge of the relationships of especially the movable skeletal parts is basic for an understanding of the muscular system. The study also forms part of a series in which the comparative anatomy of the axial skeleto-muscular systems is examined in the Decapoda. This paper falls naturally into two parts, dealing respectively with the skeleton and the muscles. Although emphasis in this work is on the trunk anatomy of the last six segments of the thorax, it is necessary to extend observations beyond this region for certain interpretations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , May 1973 , pp. 363 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamczik-Scanzoni, H., 1942. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Muskulatur und des Innenskeletts der Krabben. Zoologische Jahrbiicher, Abteilung fúr Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere, 67, 293–380.Google Scholar
Balss, H., 1940–1961. Decapoda. Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, 5 (I, 7), 1–2169.Google Scholar
Boas, J. E. V., 1880 a. Studier over Decapodernes Slaegtskabsforhold. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter, 6 Raekke, naturvidenskabelig og mathematisk Afdeling, 1 (2), 25–210.Google Scholar
Boas, J. E. V., 1880 b. Lithodes und Pagurus. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 3, 349–52.Google Scholar
Boas, J. E. V., 1924. Die verwandtschaftliche Stellung der GattungLithodes. Biologiske Meddelelser, 4 (4), 1–34.Google Scholar
Boas, J. E. V., 1926. Zur Kenntnis symmetrischer Paguriden. Biologiske Meddelelser. 5 (6), 1–52.Google Scholar
Borradaile, L. A., 1916. Crustacea. Part II. Porcellanopagurus: an instance of carcinization. Natural History Report. British Antarctic Terra Nova Expedition, 1910. Zoology, 3 (3), 111–26.Google Scholar
Bourne, G. C., 1922. The Raninidae: a study in carcinology. Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology), 35, 25–79.Google Scholar
Calman, W. T., 1904. On the classification of the Crustacea Malacostraca. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Ser. 7), 13, 144–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapple, W. D., 1966. Sensory modalities and receptive fields in the abdominal nervous system of the hermit crab, Pagurus granosimanus (Stimpson). Journal of Experimental Biology, 44, 209–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapple, W. D., 1969. Postural control of shell position by the abdomen of the hermit crab, Pagurus pollicarus. III. Analysis of movements and calculations of forces exerted by the muscles. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 171, 417–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, D. M., 1935. The skeletal musculature of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus Rathbun.Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 921 (9), 1–76.Google Scholar
De Saint, Laurent-Dechance M., 1966. Remarques sur la classification de la famille des Paguridae et sur la position systématique d’ Iridopagurus de Saint Laurent. Diagnose d’ Anapagrides gen.nov. Bulletin du Muséum d'histoire naturelle, Paris 38, 257–65.Google Scholar
Drach, P., 1950. Les étapes évolutives de l'endosquelette chez les Crustacés Décapodes. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l’ Académic des sciences, Paris 231, 1563–5.Google Scholar
Forest, J., 1966. Crustaces Decapodes: Pagurides. Annales de I'Institut Océanographique. Monaco, 44, 125–72.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H., 1889. In The Crayfish, pp. 1–371. London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Co.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. G., 1913. Eupagurus. L.M.B.C. Memoirs on Typical British Marine Plants and Animals, 21, 1–79.Google Scholar
Manton, S. M., 1960. Concerning head development in the arthropods. Biological Reviews, 35, 265–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mocquard, F., 1883. Recherches anatomiques sur l'estomac des Crustacés podophthalmaires. Annales des sciences naturelles, Zoologie,, 16, 1–311.Google Scholar
Opinion 472, 1957. Addition to the Official List of Generic Names in Zoology of the generic name Pagurus Fabricius, 1775, with Cancer bernhardus Linnaeus, 1758, as type species (Class Crustacea, Order Decapoda). Opinions and Declarations rendered by the International Com-mission on Zoological Nomenclature, London, 16, 213–76.Google Scholar
Parnas, I. & Atwood, H. L., 1966. Phasic and tonic neuromuscular systems in the abdominal extensor muscles of the crayfish and rock lobster. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 18, 701–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, N. F., 1968. The anatomy of the Cape rock lobster, Jasus lalandii (H. Milne Edwards). Annals of the South African Museum, 51, 1–232.Google Scholar
Patwardhan, S. S., 1935. On the structure and mechanism of the gastric mill in Decapoda. III. Structure of the gastric mill in Anomura. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, 1, 405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, J., 1908. Cancer. Liverpool Marine Biology Committee Memoirs on Typical British Marine Plants and Animals, 16, 1–209.Google Scholar
Pike, R. B., 1947. Galathea. Liverpool Marine Biology Committee. Memoirs on Typical Britis Marine Plants and Animals, 34, 1–179.Google Scholar
Pilgrim, R. L. C. & Wiersma, C. A. G., 1963. Observations on the skeleton and somatic musculature of the abdomen and thorax of Procambarus clarkii (Girard), with notes on the thorax of Panulirus interruptus (Randall) and Astacus. Journal of Morphology, 113, 453–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, M. D., 1965. A reinvestigation of the segmentation of the crayfish abdomen and thorax, based on a study of the deep flexor muscles and their relation to the skeleton and innervation. I. The skeleton and intersegmental membranes. Journal of Morphology, 116, 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, W., 1915. Die Muskulatur von Astacus fluviatilis (Potamobius astacus L.). Zeitschrift fúr wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 113, 165–251.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, A., 1909. In A Student's Text-book of Zoology. Ill, pp. 1–905. London: Swan Sonnenscheim.Google Scholar
Selbie, C. M., 1921. The Decapoda Reptantia of the coasts of Ireland. Part II. Paguridea. Scientific Investigations of the Fisheries Branch. Department of Agriculture and Technical Instruction for Ireland, 1, 1–68.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E., 1952. In: A Textbook of Arthropod Anatomy (Fascimile edition of 1971), pp.1–363. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Wolff, T., 1961. Description of a remarkable deep-sea hermit crab, with notes on the evolution of the Paguridea. Galathea Report, 4, 11–32.Google Scholar
Young, J. H., 1959. Morphology of the white shrimp Penaeus setiferus (Linnaeus 1758). Fishery Bulletin. Fish and Wildlife Service. United States Department of Interior 59 (145), 1–168.Google Scholar