Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:46:31.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attachment of the Coral Caryophyllia Smithii S. & B. to Tubes of the Polychaete Ditrupa Arietina (Müller) and other Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

John B. Wilson
John B. Wilson
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, Wormley, Godalming, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the early growth history of solitary corals in relation to the substrates to which they are attached. An understanding of this relationship between coral and substrate, and of how it may change throughout the life of the coral, is particularly important in studies of the life history and ecology of solitary corals living in sand and other soft sediments. A knowledge of the variety of different substrates to which solitary corals are attached in the wide range of different environments in which they live is also of importance to the palaeontologist when attempting palaeoecological interpretation of transported coral debris.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , May 1976 , pp. 291 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, N., 1939. Migration and righting reaction of the coral Fungia actinifonnis var. palawensis Doderlein. Palao Tropical Biological Station Studies, 4, 671–694.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. & Bagenal, T. B., 1952. The habits and habitat of Aporrhais pes-pelecani (L.). Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 29, 101–105.Google Scholar
Bathurst, R. G. C., 1971. Carbonate Sediments and Their Diagenesis. 620 pp. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Best, M. B., 1968. Notes on three common species of madreporian corals known as: Caryophyllia smithii, Caryophyllia clavus, Coenocyathus dohrni. Bijdragen tot de dierkunde, 38, 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornet, E. & Flahault, C., 1889. Sur quelques plantes vivant dans le test calcaire des mollusques. Bulletin de la Société botanique de France, 36 (Ser. 2, 11), CXLVII–CLXXVI. (Congres de Botanique tenu à Paris en août 1889.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouvier, E.-L., 1895. Le commensalisme chez certains polypes madréporaires. Annales des sciences naturelles (Zoologie), 20, 1–30.Google Scholar
Cavaliere, A. R. & Alberte, R. S., 1970. Fungi in animal shell fragments. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society, 86, 203–206.Google Scholar
Duerden, J. E., 1904. The coral Siderastrea radians and its post larval development. Publications. Carnegie Institution of Washington, No. 20, 130 pp.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. M., 1873. A description of the Madreporaria dredged up during the expeditions of H.M.S. ‘Porcupine’ in 1869 and 1870. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, 8, 303–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, J., 1828. A History of British Animals, Exhibiting the Descriptive Characters and Symmetrical Arrangement of the Genera and Species of Quadrupeds, Birds, Reptiles, Fishes, Mollusca and Radiata of the United Kingdom, xxiii, 565 pp. Edinburgh: Bell & Bradfute.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. & Graham, A., 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs: Their Functional Anatomy and Ecology. 755 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Golubic, S., 1969. Distribution, taxonomy, and boring patterns of marine endolithic algae. American Zoologist, 9, 747–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goreau, T. F. & Yonge, C. M., 1968. Coral community on muddy sand. Nature, London, 217, 421–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosse, P. H., 1860. Actinologica Britannica. A History of the British Sea-anemones and Corals. x, 362 pp. London: Van Voorst.Google Scholar
Gripp, K., 1958. Ecologie de quelques madréporaires de la Mediterranée (1). Vie et milieu, 9, 379–411.Google Scholar
Hiscock, K. & Howlett, R. M. (In the Press). The ecology of Caryophyllia smithii Stokes and Broderip on south-western coasts of the British Isles. In Underwater Research (ed. Lythgoe, J. N.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hubbard, J. A. E. B., 1972. Diaseris distorta, an “acrobatic” coral. Nature, London, 236, 457–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L. H., 1959. The Invertebrates: Smaller Coelomate Groups; Chaetognatha, Hemichordata, Pogonophora, Phoronida, Ectoprocta, Brachiopoda, Sipunculida, the Coelomate Bilateria (Volume V). 783 pp. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G., 1862. On an abnormal form of Cyathina smithii. Transactions of the Sections, Report of the Thirty-first Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Manchester, 1861, pp. 146–147.Google Scholar
Johnston, G., 1847. A History of the British Zoophytes, 2nd ed. Two volumes, xiv, 488 pp. London: Van Voorst.Google Scholar
Kohlmeyer, J., 1969. The role of marine fungi in the penetration of calcareous substances. American Zoologist, 9, 741–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacaze-Duthiers, H. De, 1897. Faune du Golfe du Lion, Coralliares Zoanthaires Sclérodermés (deuxième memoire). Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générate, 3 Ser., 5, 1–249.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W. C., 1866. Observations on the marine zoology of North Uist, Outer Hebrides (Coelenterata, Mollusca, Echinodermata, Gephyrea and Pisces). Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 5, 600–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, A. M., 1869. Shetland final dredging report. Part II. On the Crustacea, Echinodermata, Polyzoa, Actinozoa and Hydrozoa. Report of the Thirty-eighth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Norwich, 1868, pp. 247–342.Google Scholar
Riding, R., 1975. Girvanella and other algae as depth indicators. Lethaia, 8, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, D. F., 1967. The evolution of the deep-sea coral family Micrabaciidae. University of Miami, Institute of Marine Science, Studies in Tropical Oceanography, No. 5, 502–510.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. W. & Wells, J. W., 1943. Revision of the suborders, families and genera of the Scleractinia. Geological Society of America Special Papers, No. 44, 363 pp.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. B., 1975a. The distribution of the coral Caryophyllia smithii S. & B. on the Scottish continental shelf. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 611–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. B., 1975b. R.R.S. ‘Challenger’ Cruise 14/74 (Legs 1 & 2) 29 August-21 September 1974. Geological investigations on the continental shelf to the west and north of Scotland. Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Cruise Report, No. 22, 25 pp.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1937. The biology of Aporrhais pes-pelecani (L.) and A. serresiana (Mich.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 21, 687–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1963. Rock-boring organisms. In Mechanisms of Hard Tissue Destruction (ed. Sognneas, R. F.). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington D.C. Publication No. 75, 1–24. 746 pp.Google Scholar
Zibrowius, H., 1970. Étude qualitative et quantitative des salissures biologiques de plaques expérimentales immergées en pleine eau, 3. Caryophyllia smithii Stokes & Broderip et considérations sur autres espèces de madréporaires. Téthys, 2, 615–632.Google Scholar