Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Santos, M. B.
Pierce, G. J.
Learmonth, J. A.
Reid, R. J.
Ross, H. M.
Patterson, I. A. P.
Reid, D. G.
and
Beare, D.
2004.
VARIABILITY IN THE DIET OF HARBOR PORPOISES (PHOCOENA PHOCOENA) IN SCOTTISH WATERS 1992–2003.
Marine Mammal Science,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Trites, Andrew W.
and
Joy, Ruth
2005.
DIETARY ANALYSIS FROM FECAL SAMPLES: HOW MANY SCATS ARE ENOUGH?.
Journal of Mammalogy,
Vol. 86,
Issue. 4,
p.
704.
Ferenbaugh, Joy
Strauss, Richard
Tollit, Dominic
Chen, Zhongxing
and
Diamond, Sandra
2009.
Exploring the potential of otolith microchemistry to enhance diet analysis in pinnipeds.
Marine Biology,
Vol. 156,
Issue. 11,
p.
2235.
Jansen, Okka E.
Leopold, Mardik F.
Meesters, Erik H.W.G.
and
Smeenk, Chris
2010.
Are white-beaked dolphinsLagenorhynchus albirostrisfood specialists? Their diet in the southern North Sea.
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom,
Vol. 90,
Issue. 8,
p.
1501.
Gibbs, Susan E.
Harcourt, Robert G.
and
Kemper, Catherine M.
2011.
Niche differentiation of bottlenose dolphin species in South Australia revealed by stable isotopes and stomach contents.
Wildlife Research,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 4,
p.
261.
Nichol, Linda M.
Hall, Anna M.
Ellis, Graeme M.
Stredulinsky, Eva
Boogaards, Melissa
and
Ford, John K.B.
2013.
Dietary overlap and niche partitioning of sympatric harbour porpoises and Dall’s porpoises in the Salish Sea.
Progress in Oceanography,
Vol. 115,
Issue. ,
p.
202.
Scheinin, A.P.
Kerem, D.
Lojen, S.
Liberzon, J.
and
Spanier, E.
2014.
Resource partitioning between common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the Israeli bottom trawl fishery? Assessment by stomach contents and tissue stable isotopes analysis.
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 6,
p.
1203.
Ross, Stine D.
Andreasen, Heidi
and
Andersen, Niels G.
2016.
An important step towards accurate estimation of diet composition and consumption rates for the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena).
Marine Mammal Science,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 4,
p.
1491.
de Carvalho, Barbara Maichak
Spach, Henry Louis
Vaz-Dos-Santos, André Martins
and
Volpedo, Alejandra Vanina
2019.
Otolith shape index: is it a tool for trophic ecology studies?.
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom,
Vol. 99,
Issue. 7,
p.
1675.
Mitsui, Shota
Strüssmann, Carlos A.
Yokota, Masashi
and
Yamamoto, Yoji
2020.
Comparative otolith morphology and species identification of clupeids from Japan.
Ichthyological Research,
Vol. 67,
Issue. 4,
p.
502.
Byrd, Barbie L.
Hohn, Aleta A.
and
Krause, Jacob R.
2020.
Using the otolith sulcus to aid in prey identification and improve estimates of prey size in diet studies of a piscivorous predator.
Ecology and Evolution,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 8,
p.
3584.
Neri, Alessandra
Sartor, Paolo
Voliani, Alessandro
Mancusi, Cecilia
and
Marsili, Letizia
2022.
Diet of Bottlenose Dolphin, Tursiops truncatus (Montagu, 1821), in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea.
Diversity,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
21.
Stavenow, Jasmine
Roos, Anna Maria
Ågren, Erik Olof
Kinze, Carl
Englund, William F.
and
Neimanis, Aleksija
2022.
Sowerby’s Beaked Whales (Mesoplodon bidens) in the Skagerrak and Adjacent Waters: Historical Records and Recent Post-Mortem Findings.
Oceans,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 3,
p.
250.
Klemens, Lisa
Neven, Carolin Julie
Bär, Tom
Krumme, Uwe
and
Dähne, Michael
2022.
In vitro forestomach digestion experiments give less-biased estimates of food composition in odontocetes.
Biology Open,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 10,
Leonhard, Isabella
and
Agiadi, Konstantina
2023.
Addressing challenges in marine conservation with fish otoliths and their death assemblages.
Geological Society, London, Special Publications,
Vol. 529,
Issue. 1,
p.
243.
Vogel, Emma F.
Rikardsen, Audun H.
Blanchet, Marie-Anne
Blévin, Pierre
and
Biuw, Martin
2024.
Norwegian killer whale movements reflect their different prey types.
Polar Research,
Vol. 43,
Issue. ,