Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:51:09.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Annual and spatial variation of intertidal benthic community zonation in a breakwater off the Rio de Janeiro coast, south-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2009

Bruno Pereira Masi ,
Isabela Maria Macedo  and
Ilana Rosental Zalmon
Bruno Pereira Masi
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Avenida Alberto Lamego, 2000, 28013-602, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil
Isabela Maria Macedo
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Avenida Alberto Lamego, 2000, 28013-602, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil
Ilana Rosental Zalmon*
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Avenida Alberto Lamego, 2000, 28013-602, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: I.R. Zalmon, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Avenida Alberto Lamego, 2000, 28013-602, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate the vertical distribution of intertidal benthic organisms in different periods of the year, relating them to tide, air temperature, height and wave periodicity in breakwaters off the northern Rio de Janeiro State, and to compare the zonation at two sites (Pier and Barra) with distinct hydrodynamics, due to different wave swell. Quadrats of 400 cm2 were sampled by a photoquadrat method. The upper limit of the marine organisms was higher at the Barra site (intertidal zone of 3.8 m) than at the Pier site (intertidal zone of 2.2 m). The littoral fringe assemblage did not show significant differences between sites, but a larger range of this fringe and the upper eulittoral band at Barra was quite evident. This site was mostly characterized by species of more exposed areas such as Chaetomorpha sp. and Perna perna in the upper and lower eulittoral bands, and by C. teedii and Ulva fasciata in the sublittoral fringe. A seasonal difference was identified in the air exposure degree at the Pier site, which was higher in October 2005 and February 2006. The air temperature and wave height and periodicity differed significantly among the four studied periods. The typical seasonal species were F. clenchi (July 2005 and October 2005), Gigartina domingensis (July 2005), Grateloupia sp. (October 2005) and Porphyra acanthophora (October 2005 and February 2006). The intermediate benthic band of the intertidal zone occupied a narrow zone, changing its spatial location according to the season of the year. The hypothesis of annual variation of the benthic community zonation according to the seasonal variability of tides, air temperatures and wave's height and periodicity was accepted for the intermediate band of the intertidal zone, due to the taxonomic differences and the abundance of dominant species in the four seasons. The difference in the vertical distribution of the intertidal benthic assemblages of both breakwaters highlights a distinct wave exposure condition, and reflects the breakwaters' orientation and the wave swell at each site.

Keywords

annual and spatial variationintertidal benthic community zonationbreakwatersRio de Janeiro coastsouth-eastern Brazil
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 225 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benedetti-Cecchi, L. and Cinelli, F. (1997) Spatial distribution of algae and invertebrates in the rocky intertidal zone of the Strait of Magellan: are patterns general? Polar Biology 18, 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedetti-Cecchi, L., Maggi, E., Bertocci, I., Vaselli, E., Micheli, F., Osio, G.C. and Cinelli, F. (2003) Variation in rocky shore assemblages in the north-western Mediterranean: contrasts between islands and the mainland. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 293, 93–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boaventura, D., Ré, P., Fonseca, L.C. and Hawkins, S.J. (2002) Intertidal rocky shore communities of the continental Portuguese coast: analysis of distribution patterns. Marine Ecology 23, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito, L.V.R., Széchy, M.T.M. and Cassiano, V. (2002) Levontamento taxonômico da microalgas da zona das marés de costões rochosos adjacentes ao Terminal Marítimo Almirante Maximiano Fonseca, Baía Da Ilha Grande, RJ. Atlântica 24, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulleri, F. and Chapman, M.G. (2004) Intertidal assemblages on artificial and natural habitats in marinas on the north-west coast of Italy. Marine Biology 145, 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, M.G. (2002) Patterns of spatial and temporal variation of macrofauna under boulders in a sheltered boulder field. Austral Ecology 27, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, M.G. and Bulleri, F.C. (2003) Intertidal seawalls: new features of landscape in intertidal environments. Landscape and Urban Planning 62, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edition. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Coma, R., Ribes, M., Gill, J.-M. and Zabala, M. (2000) Seasonality in coastal benthic ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 448–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coutinho, R. (2002) Bentos de costões rochosos. In Pereira, R.C. and Soares-Gomes, A. (eds.) Biologia marinha. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência Press, pp. 147–157.Google Scholar
Davidson, I.C., Crook, A.C. and Barnes, D.K.A. (2004) Quantifying spatial patterns of intertidal biodiversity: is movement important? Marine Ecology 25, 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, M.W. and Paine, R.T. (1998) Celestial mechanisms, sea-level changes, and intertidal ecology. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 194, 108–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dye, A.H. (1998) Dynamics of rocky intertidal communities: analyses of long time series from South African shores. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 46, 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forde, S. and Raimondi, P.T. (2004) An experimental test of the effects of variation in recruitment intensity on intertidal community composition. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 301, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gevertz, R. (1995) Em busca do conhecimento ecológico: uma introdução à metodologia. São Paulo: Edgard Blucher.Google Scholar
Good, T.P. (2004) Distribution and abundance patterns in Caribbean rocky intertidal zones. Bulletin of Marine Science 74, 459–468.Google Scholar
Guichard, F., Bourget, E. and Robert, J.L. (2001) Scaling the influence of topographic heterogeneity on intertidal benthic communities: alternate trajectories mediated by hydrodynamics and shading. Marine Ecology Progress Series 217, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmuth, B. and Denny, M.W. (2003) Predicting wave exposure in the rocky intertidal zone: do bigger waves always lead to larger forces? Limnology and Oceanography 48, 1338–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmuth, B., Harley, C.D.G., Halpin, P.M., O'Donnell, M., Hofmann, G.E. and Blanchette, C.A. (2002) Climate change and latitudinal patterns of intertidal thermal stress. Science 298, 1015–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, N. and Williams, G.A. (2001) Spatio-temporal variation in recruitment on a seasonal tropical rocky shore: the importance of local versus non-local processes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 215, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S.R. and Hawkins, S.J. (2003) Barnacle larval supply to sheltered rocky shores: a limiting factor? Hydrobiologia 503, 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, J.T.O. (1994) Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.R. (1964) The ecology of rocky shores. London: English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Little, C. and Kiching, J.A. (1996) The biology of rocky shores. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, N.S., Ambrose, R.F. and Dethier, M.N. (2006) Monitoring rocky shores. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Oliveira, E.C. and Paula, E.J. (1984) Aspectos da distribuição vertical e variação sazonal de comunidades da zona das marés em costões rochosos do litoral norte de São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 147, 44–71.Google Scholar
Pineda, J., Riebensahm, D. and Medeiros-Bergen, D. (2002) Semibalanus balanoides in winter and spring: larval concentration, settlement, and substrate occupancy. Marine Biology 140, 789–800.Google Scholar
Porri, F., McQuaid, C.D. and Radloff, S. (2006) Temporal scales of variation in settlement and recruitment of the mussel Perna perna (Linnaeus, 1758). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 332, 178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer-Machado, K.R.S., Chapman, A.R.O. and Coutinho, R. (1992) Patch structure in a tropical rocky shore community in Brazil: a mosaic of sucessional states? Helsinger 35, 187–195.Google Scholar
Stenseng, E., Braby, C.E. and Somero, G.N. (2005) Evolutionary and acclimation- induced variation in the thermal limits of heart function in congeneric marine snails (Genus Tegula): implications for vertical zonation. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 208, 138–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Underwood, A.J. (1981) Structure of a rocky intertidal community in New South Wales: patterns of vertical distribution and seasonal changes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 51, 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Chapman, M.G. (2000) Variation in abundances of intertidal populations: consequences of extremities of environment. Hydrobiologia 426, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar