Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:43:20.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Interpretation of the Taxonomic Relationship Between the Limpets Patella Rustica and P. Piperata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

H.B.S.M. Côrte-Real
Affiliation:
Port Erin Marine Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Port Erin, Isle of Man, IM9 6JA.
S.J. Hawkins
Affiliation:
Port Erin Marine Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Port Erin, Isle of Man, IM9 6JA.
J.P. Thorpe
Affiliation:
Port Erin Marine Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Port Erin, Isle of Man, IM9 6JA.

Extract

The taxonomic relationship between the limpets Patella rustica (Mollusca: Archaeogastropoda) and P. piperata is unclear with controversy as to whether P. piperata should be given specific status. The problems stem from its similar morphology but different biogeographic range from P. rustica. Individuals from seven populations of P. rustica and three of P. piperata were analysed for a combination of morphological and genetical characters. Morphological analyses of shell shape and radular morphology revealed differences between species for radular length, higher in P. rustica than in P. piperata, and the shape of the pluricuspid teeth of the radula with a well-developed internal cusp in P. piperata but not in P. rustica. Electrophoretic results based on 11 allozyme loci, however, did not distinguish the two species clearly. The overall genetic identity value between the two was 0·861, a value which lies within the range for conspecific populations of other patellids. It is proposed that P. piperata on the basis of the genetic data obtained, may represent a subspecies of P. rustica that is in the process of diverging due to its geographic isolation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atchley, W.R., Nordheim, E.V., Gunsett, F.C. & Crump, P.L., 1982. Geometric and probabilistic aspects of statistical distance functions. Systematic Zoology, 31, 445460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avise, J.C., 1974. The systematic value of electrophoresis data. Systematic Zoology, 23, 465481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, F.J., 1983. Enzymes as taxonomic characters. In Protein polymorphism: adaptive and taxonomic significance (ed. G.S., Oxford and D., Rollinson), pp. 326. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Badino, G. & Sella, G., 1980. Phosphoglucose isomerase variability in sympatric populations of Mediterranean species of Patella (Gastropoda, Prosobanchiata). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2, 315320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantine, W.J., 1961. The population dynamics of Patella vulgata and other limpets. PhD thesis, Queen Mary College, University of London.Google Scholar
Beaumont, A.R. & Beveridge, C.M., 1984. Electrophoretic survey of genetic variation in Pecten maximns, Chlamys opercularis, C. varia and C. distorta from the Irish Sea. Marine Biology, 81, 299306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, E.M., 1973. Gene-enzyme variation in three sympatric species of Littorina. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 145, 8390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, E.M., 1983. Population genetics of marine gastropods and bivalves. In The Mollusca. Vol. 6. Ecology (ed. W.D., Russell-Hunter), pp. 563596. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berggren, W.A. & Hollister, C.D., 1974. Paleogeography, paleobiogeography and the history of circulation in the Atlantic Ocean. Special Publications of the Society of Economic Paleontology and Mineralogy, 20, 126186.Google Scholar
Bucquoy, E., Dautzenberg, P.H. & Dollfus, G.F., 1886. Les mollusques marins du Rousillon. Paris.Google Scholar
Buroker, N.E., 1984. Gene flow in mainland and insular populations of Crassostrea (Mollusca). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 166, 550557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buroker, N.E., Hershberger, W.K. & Chew, K.K., 1979. Population genetics of the family Ostreidae. II. Interspecific studies of the genera Crassostrea and Saccostrea. Marine Biology, 54, 171184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiaens, J., 1968. Validite du nom Patella piperata Gould. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle. Paris, 40, 366373.Google Scholar
Christiaens, J., 1973. Revision du genre Patella (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle. Paris, 182, 13051392.Google Scholar
Colognola, R., Mastrurzo, P., Russo, G.F., Scardi, M., Vinci, D. & Fresi, E., 1986. Biometric and genetic analysis of the marine rissoid Rissoa auriscalpium (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) and its ecological implications. Marine Ecology, 7, 265285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côrte-Real, H.B.S.M., Hawkins, S.J. & Thorpe, J.P., 1992. Genetic confirmation that intertidal and subtidal morphs oi Patella ulyssiponensis aspera Röding (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Patellidae) are conspecific. Arquipelago, 10, 5566.Google Scholar
Côrte-Real, H.B.S.M., Hawkins, S.J. & Thorpe, J.P., 1996. Population differentiation and the taxonomic status of the exploited limpet Patella candei in the Macaronesian islands (Azores, Madeira, Canaries). Marine Biology, 125, 141152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D.J. & Fischer-Piette, E., 1959. Repartition des principales espèces intercotidales de la côte Atlantique francaise en 1954–1955. Annales de l'lnstitut d'Océanographie du Monaco, 36, 275388.Google Scholar
Davies, P.S., 1969. Effect of environment on metabolic activity and morphology of Mediterranean and British species of Patella. Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli I, 37, 641656.Google Scholar
Day, A.J. & Bayne, B.L., 1988. Allozyme variation in populations of the dog-whelk Nucella lapillus (Prosobranchia: Muricacea) from the south west peninsula of England. Marine Biology, 99, 93100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, J.M., 1957. Artificial fertilization, larval development and metamorphosis in Patella vulgata L. and Patella caendea L. Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli I, 29,172186.Google Scholar
Evans, R.G., 1958. The genus Patella on the west coast of France. Journal de Conchyliologie, 98, 126151.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1935. Systematique et biogeographie. Les patelles d'Europe et d'Afrique du Nord. Journal de Conchyliologie, 79, 566.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E. & Gaillard, J., 1959. Les patelles au long des cotes Atlantiques Iberiques et Nord-Morocaines. Journal de Conchyliologie, 99, 135200.Google Scholar
Fujino, K., Sasaki, K. & Wilkins, N.P., 1980. Genetic studies on the Pacific abalone. III. Differences in electrophoretic patterns between Haliotis discus Reeve and H. discus hannai Ino. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries, 46, 543548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffney, P.M., 1980. On the number of Patella species in south-west England. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60, 565574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, E.M., 1984. The systematic status of Mytilusgalloprovincialis in western Europe: a review. Malacologia, 25, 551568.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J., Côrte-Real, H.B.S.M., Martins, H.R., Santos, R.S. & Frias, Martins A.M., 1990. A note on the identity of Patella in the Azores. Agoreana, 167173. [Supplement.]Google Scholar
Hedgecock, D. & Okazaki, N.B., 1984. Genetic diversity within and between populations of American oysters (Crassostrea). Malacologia, 25, 535549.Google Scholar
Janson, K., 1987. Allozyme and shell variation in two marine snails (Littorina, Prosobranchia) with different dispersal abilities. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society of London, 30, 245256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, K. & Ward, R.D., 1985. The taxonomic status of Littorina tenebrosa Montagu as assessed by morphological and genetical analyses. Journal of Conchology, 32, 915.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.S. & Black, R., 1982. Chaotic genetic patchiness in an intertidal limpet Siphonaria sp. Marine Biology, 70, 157164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H.D., Hawkins, S.J., Watson, D.C., Jack, E.M. & Kyriakides, M.A., 1984. The radular formula of Patella species. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 50, 123124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessios, H.A., 1992. Testing electrophoretic data for agreement with Hardy-Weinberg expectations. Marine Biology, 112, 517523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M., 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist, 106, 283292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M., 1987. Genetic distance and molecular phylogeny. In Population genetics and fishery management (ed. N., Ryman and F., Utter), pp. 193223. Seattle: Washington Sea Grant Program.Google Scholar
Nei, M. & Roychoudhury, A.K., 1974. Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics, 76, 379390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nobre, A., 1937. Moluscos testaceos marinhos do arquipelago da Madeira. Memorias e Estudos do Museu Zoologico da Universidade de Coimbra, 98, 1101.Google Scholar
Nolan, C.P., 1991. Size, shape and shell morphology of the Antarctic limpet Nucella concinna at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Journal ofMolluscan Studies, 57, 225238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallary, P., 1900. Coquilles marines du littoral du departement d'Oran. Journal de Conchyliologie, 48, 211434.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H., 1891. Patellidae, structure and systematics. In Manual of conchology (ed. G.W., Tyron), pp. 1195. Philadelphia: National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Powell, A., 1973. The patellid limpets of the world. Indo-Pacific Mollusca, 3, 75206.Google Scholar
Richardson, B.J., Baverstock, P.R. & Adams, M., 1986. Allozyme electrophoresis. A handbook for animal systematics and population studies. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Saavedra, C., Zapata, C., Guerra, A. & Alvarez, G., 1993. Allozyme variation in European populations of the oyster Ostrea edulis. Marine Biology, 115, 8595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanjuan, A., Zapata, C. & Alvarez, G., 1994. Mytilus galloprovincialis and M. edulis on the coasts of the Iberian Peninsula. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 113, 131146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheltema, R.S., 1978. On the relationship between dispersal veliger larvae and the evolution of marine prosobranch gastropods. In Marine organisms: genetics, ecology, and evolution (ed. B., Battaglia and J.A., Beardmore), pp. 303322. New York: Plenum Press. [NATO Conference Series: IV. Marine Science, V.2.]Google Scholar
Scheltema, R.S., 1986. On dispersal and planktonic larvae of benthic invertebrates: an eclectic overview and summary of problems. Bulletin of Marine Science, 39, 290322.Google Scholar
Seed, R., 1971. A physiological and biochemical approach to the taxonomy of Mytilus edulis L. and M. galloprovincialis Lmk. from SW England. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 12, 291322.Google Scholar
Selander, R.K., 1970. Behaviour and genetic variation in natural populations. American Zoologist, 10, 5366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sella, G., 1976. Biometrical relationships between mesolittoral and infralittoral Patella populations in the Mediterranean. Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli I, 40, 123132.Google Scholar
Sella, G., Robotti, C.A. & Biglione, V., 1993. Genetic divergence among three sympatric species of Mediterranean Patella (Archaeogastropoda). Marine Biology, 115, 401405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, B.T., 1985. Bivariate and multivariate growth allometry: statistical and biological considerations. Journal of Zoology, 206, 367390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skibinski, D.O.F., Cross, T.F. & Ahmad, M., 1980. Electrophoretic investigation of systematic relationships in the marine mussels Modiolus modiolus L., Mytilus edulis L., and Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk. (Mytilidae; Mollusca). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society of London, 13, 6574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, M., 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 393430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R., 1973. Numerical taxonomy. San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Snyder, T.P. & Gooch, J.L., 1973. Genetic differentiation in Littorina saxatilis (Gastropoda). Marine Biology, 22, 177182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D.L. & Selander, R.B., 1981. BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. Journal of Heredity, 72, 281283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, J.P., 1979. Enzyme variation and taxonomy: the estimation of sampling errors in measurements of interspecific genetic similarity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society of London, 11, 369386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, J.P., 1982. The molecular clock hypothesis: biochemical evolution, genetic differentiation and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 139168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, J.P., 1983. Enzyme variation, genetic distance and evolutionary divergence in relation to levels of taxonomic separation. In Protein polymorphism: adaptive and taxonomic significance (ed. G.S., Oxford and D., Rollinson), pp. 131152. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thorpe, J.P. & Sole-Cava, A.M., 1994. The use of allozyme electrophoresis in invertebrate systematics. Zoologica Scripta, 23, 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson, G., 1961. Length of pelagic larval life in marine bottom invertebrates as related to larval transport by ocean currents. In Oceanography (ed. M., Sears), pp. 455474. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
Varvio, S.-L., Koehn, R.K. & Vainola, R., 1988. Evolutionary genetics of the Mytilus edulis complex in the North Atlantic region. Marine Biology, 98, 5160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, R.B., 1897. On the marine Mollusca of Madeira; with descriptions of thirty-five new species, and an index-list of all the known sea-dwelling species of that island. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 26, 233329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S.Y., Soule, M. & Gorman, G.C., 1974. Anolis lizards of the eastern Caribbean: a case study in evolution. I. Genetic relationships, phylogeny and colonization sequence of the Roquet group. Systematic Zoology, 23, 387399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H., 1984. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar