Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:05:26.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An inference procedure for behavioural studies combining numerical simulations, statistics and experimental results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2017

Jean-Marc Guarini*
Affiliation:
The Entangled Bank Laboratory, 66650 Banyuls sur Mer, France CNRS/UBO – UMR 6539 LEMAR/LIA BeBEST (Benthique Biodiversity, Ecology, Sciences et Technologies), Rue Dumont d'Urville, 29280 Plouzané, France
Jennifer Coston-Guarini
Affiliation:
The Entangled Bank Laboratory, 66650 Banyuls sur Mer, France CNRS/UBO – UMR 6539 LEMAR/LIA BeBEST (Benthique Biodiversity, Ecology, Sciences et Technologies), Rue Dumont d'Urville, 29280 Plouzané, France
Tim Deprez
Affiliation:
Marine Biology Research Group, Krijgslaan 281/S8, B9000 Gent, Belgium
Laurent Chauvaud
Affiliation:
CNRS/UBO – UMR 6539 LEMAR/LIA BeBEST (Benthique Biodiversity, Ecology, Sciences et Technologies), Rue Dumont d'Urville, 29280 Plouzané, France
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J.-M. Guarini The Entangled Bank Laboratory, 66650 Banyuls sur Mer, France email: [email protected]

Abstract

The technical difficulties of performing underwater observation mean that marine ecologists have long relied on behavioural experiments to study reactions of marine organisms. In this article, we examine the underlying complexity of assumptions made in raceway experiments and we propose a statistical inference procedure tailored to this type of experimental protocol. As an example, experiments were performed to test if light of two different intensities affects the proximal behaviour (i.e. direct, local and immediate) of two species of crustaceans, the hermit crab (Pagurus bernhardus), and the green crab (Carcinus maenas). Individuals were collected in the vicinity of the Sven Loven Marine Center in Tjarnö (Sweden). Their movements in raceways were recorded and the statistical distance between the resulting experimental distribution and a simulated null distribution was used to compare their behaviour in two situations: dim (when they were expected to feed) and bright light (when they were expected to shelter). Initial tests indicated no differences of behaviour between dim and bright light for the two species. However, when compared with the reference state (here, a null distribution) the behaviour in dim light deviates significantly from the null distribution suggesting non-random behaviour. Our results suggest that efforts should be made to understand the behaviours of the individuals of these two species to establish a comprehensive reference state as a basis for comparison. This fundamental information should be a prerequisite before implementing experiments testing how potential disturbances affect individual organisms in behavioural ecology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bennie, J., Davies, T.W., Inger, R. and Gaston, K.J. (2014) Mapping artificial lightscapes for ecological studies. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5, 534540.Google Scholar
Brady, J. (2013) Behavioral rhythms in invertebrates. In Achoff, J. (ed.) Biological rhythms, Volume 4. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 125144.Google Scholar
Briffa, M., Bridger, D. and Biro, P.A. (2013) How does temperature affect behaviour? Multilevel analysis of plasticity, personality and predictability in hermit crabs. Animal Behaviour 86, 4754.Google Scholar
Brüning, A., Hölker, F., Franke, S., Preuer, T. and Kloas, W. (2015) Spotlight on fish: light pollution affects circadian rhythms of European perch but does not cause stress. Science of the Total Environment 511, 516522.Google Scholar
Burrows, M.T., Kawai, K. and Hughes, R.N. (1999) Foraging by mobile predators on a rocky shore: underwater TV observations of movements of blennies Lipophrys pholis and crabs Carcinus maenas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 187, 237250.Google Scholar
Campbell, D.L.M., Weiner, S.A., Starks, P.T. and Hauber, M.E. (2009) Context and control: behavioural ecology experiments in the laboratory. Annales Zoologici Fennici 46, 112123.Google Scholar
Carlton, J.T. and Cohen, A.N. (2003) Episodic global dispersal in shallow water marine organisms: the case history of the European shore crabs Carcinus maenas and C. aestuarii. Journal of Biogeography 30, 18091820.Google Scholar
Chakravarti, L.J. and Cotton, P.A. (2014) The effects of a competitor on the foraging behaviour of the shore crab Carcinus maenas. PLoS ONE 9, e93546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093546.Google Scholar
Chapman, M.G. (2000) Poor design of behavioural experiments gets poor results: examples from intertidal habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 250, 7795.Google Scholar
Cinzano, P. and Falchi, F. (2014) Quantifying light pollution. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 139, 1320.Google Scholar
Cinzano, P., Falchi, F. and Elvidge, C.D. (2001) The first world atlas of the artificial night sky brightness. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 328, 689707.Google Scholar
Cohen, A.N. and Carlton, J.T. (1995) Non-indigenous aquatic species in a United States estuary: a case study of the biological invasions of the San Francisco Bay and Delta. Biological Studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Davies, N.B., Krebs, J.R. and West, S.A. (2012) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 4th edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1981) Nonparametric estimates of standard error: the jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods. Biometrika 68, 589599.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, K.D. and Beecham, J.A. (1999) How do grazers achieve their distribution? A continuum of models from random diffusion to the ideal free distribution using biased random walks. American Naturalist 153, 509526.Google Scholar
Franke, S., Brüning, A., Hölker, F. and Kloas, W. (2013) Study of biological action of light on fish. Journal of Light and Visual Environment 37, 111.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P.E. and Nikulin, M.S. (1996) A guide to chi-squared testing. Applied probability and statistics. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Gurarie, E., Bracis, C., Delgado, M., Meckley, T.D., Kojola, I. and Wagner, M. (2015) What is the animal doing? Tools for exploring behavioural structure in animal movements. Journal of Animal Ecology 85, 6984.Google Scholar
Kamrowski, R.L., Limpus, C., Moloney, J. and Hamman, M. (2012) Coastal light pollution and marine turtles: assessing the magnitude of the problem. Endangered Species Research 19, 8598.Google Scholar
Lynch, B.R. and Rochette, R. (2007) Circatidal rhythm of free-roaming sub-tidal green crabs, Carcinus maenas, revealed by radio-acoustic positional telemetry. Crustaceana 80, 345355.Google Scholar
Martin, P. and Bateson, P. (2007) Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide, 3rd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGaw, I.J. and Naylor, E. (1992) Distribution and rhythmic locomotor patterns of estuarine and open-shore populations of Carcinus maenas. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 72, 599609.Google Scholar
McGaw, I.J. and Penney, C.M. (2014) Effect of meal type on specific dynamic action in the green crab, Carcinus maenas. Journal of Comparative Physiology B 184, 425436.Google Scholar
Metz, H.A.J., Dienkse, H., de Jonge, G. and Putters, F.A. (1983) Continuous-time Markov chains as models for animal behaviour. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 45, 643658.Google Scholar
Moore, M.V., Pierce, S.M., Walsh, H.M., Kvalvik, S.K. and Lim, J.D. (2000) Urban light pollution alters the diel vertical migration of Daphnia. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie 27, 14.Google Scholar
Navarro-Barranco, C. and Hughes, L.E. (2015) Effects of light pollution on the emergent fauna of shallow marine ecosystems: amphipods as a case study. Marine Pollution Bulletin 94, 235240.Google Scholar
Nickell, T. D. and Moore, P.G. (1992) The behavioural ecology of epibenthic scavenging invertebrates in the Clyde Sea area: laboratory experiments on attractions to bait in moving water, underwater TV observations in situ and general conclusions. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 159, 1535.Google Scholar
Pihl, L. (1985) Food selection and consumption of mobile epibenthic fauna in shallow marine areas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 22, 169179.Google Scholar
Poulin, C., Bruyant, F., Laprise, M.-H., Cockshutt, A.M., Vandenhecke, J.M.-R. and Huot, Y. (2013) The impact of light pollution on diel changes in the photophysiology of Microcystis aeruginosa. Journal of Plankton Research 36, 286291.Google Scholar
Quinn, B.K., Boudreau, M.R. and Hamilton, D.J. (2012) Inter- and intraspecific interactions among green crabs (Carcinus maenas) and whelks (Nucella lapillus) foraging on blue mussels (Mytilus edulis). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 412, 117125.Google Scholar
Ramsay, K., Kaiser, M.J. and Hughes, R.N. (1997) A field study of intraspecific competition for food in hermit crabs (Pagurus bernhardus). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 44, 213220.Google Scholar
Renshaw, E. and Henderson, R. (1981) The correlated random walk. Journal of Applied Probability 18, 403414.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A.M. (2014) Towards a mechanistic framework that explains correlated random walk behaviour: correlated random walkers can optimize their fitness when foraging under the risk of predation. Ecological Complexity 19, 1822.Google Scholar
Robinson, E.M., Smee, D.L. and Trussell, G.C. (2011) Green crab (Carcinus maenas) foraging efficiency reduced by fast flows. PLoS ONE 6, e21025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021025.Google Scholar
Sol, D., Lapiedra, O. and González-Lagos, C. (2013) Behavioural adjustments for a life in the city. Animal Behaviour 85, 11011112.Google Scholar
Tran, M.V. (2015) Behavioral reactions to novel food odors by intertidal hermit crabs. Behavioral Processes 113, 3540.Google Scholar
Turra, A. and Denadai, M.R. (2003) Daily activity of four tropical intertidal hermit crabs from southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 63, 537544.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (2009) Components of design in ecological field experiments. Annales Zoologici Fennici 46, 93111.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. and Schwarzkopf, L. (2016) A random walk in the park: an individual-based model for behavioral thermoregulation. American Naturalist 187, 481490.Google Scholar
Ylonen, H. and Wolff, J.O. (1999) Experiments in behavioural ecology and the real world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14, 82.Google Scholar