Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:41:02.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Analysis of Factors Determining Seasonal Variation in the Byssal Attachment Strength of Mytilus Edulis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

H. A. Price
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, Cardiff, CF1 1XL

Extract

INTRODUCTION

The common mussel Mytilus edulis L. is one of the most successful shore molluscs. It is widely distributed in the northern hemisphere and is abundant not only in the most sheltered bays and loughs but also in conditions of extreme exposure (Lewis, 1964; Seed, 1976). Attachment to the substratum is by means of the proteinaceous byssus complex, the strength of which has been shown to vary seasonally (Price, 1980b). This variation could be a response to seasonal fluctuations in wave action, as suggested by Pieters et al. (1978), or may result from the seasonality of other environmental variables. Some of these, e.g. salinity and sea temperature, have been shown to influence byssus production (Glaus, 1968; Van Winkle, 1970; Allen et al. 1976), Phytoplankton density, spawning and the reduced ‘scope for growth’ during winter months (Bayne & Widdows, 1978) may also play a role in determining byssus strength.

In the present study, the relationships between byssal attachment strength and environmental and other variables are examined in a population of mussels on the South Wales coast.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. A., Cook, M., Jackson, D. J., Preston, S. & Worth, E. M., 1976. Observations on the rate of production and mechanical properties of the byssus threads of Mytilus edulis L. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 42, 279289.Google Scholar
Ballantine, W. J., 1961. A biologically-defined exposure scale for the comparative description of rocky shores. Field Studies, 1(3), 119.Google Scholar
Bascom, W. N., 1964. Waves and Beaches, The Dynamics of the Ocean Surface. 267 pp. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Bayne, B. L. & Widdows, J., 1978. The physiological ecology of two populations of Mytilus edulis L. Oceologia, 37, 137162.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Southward, A. J., 1958. The distribution of intertidal organisms along the coasts of the English Channel. Journal of The Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 157208.Google Scholar
Darbyshire, M. & Draper, L., 1963. Forecasting wind-generated sea waves. Engineering, London, 195, 482484.Google Scholar
Glaus, K. J., 1968. Factors influencing the production of byssus threads in Mytilus edulis. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Holt, Afass., 135, 420.Google Scholar
Harger, J. R. E., 1970. The effect of wave impact on some aspects of the biology of sea mussels. Veliger, 12, 401414.Google Scholar
Jones, E. W. & Demetropoulos, A., 1968. Exposure to wave action: measurement of an important ecological parameter on rocky shores on Angleséy. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2, 4663.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. R., 1964. The Ecology of Rocky Shores, xii, 323 pp. London: English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Lysaght, A. M., 1941. The biology and trematode parasites of the gastropod Littorina neritoides (L.) on the Plymouth Breakwater. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 25, 4167.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1935. The biology of Balanus balanoides. IV. Relation to environmental factors. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kirgdom, 20, 279307.Google Scholar
Pieters, H., Kluytmans, J. H., Zurburg, W. & Zandee, D. I., 1978. The influence of seasonal changes on energy metabolism in Mytilus edulis (L.). I. Growth rate and biochemical composition in relation to environmental parameters and spawning. In Cyclic Phenomena in Marine Plants and Animals. Proceedings of the 13th European Marine Biology Symposium, Isle of Man, 1978 (ed. Naylor, E. and Hartnoll, R. G.), pp. 285292. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Price, H. A., 1980 a. Studies on the Production and Function of the Byssus Complex of Mytilus edulis L. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Price, H. A., 1980 b. Seasonal variation in the strength of byssal attachment of the common mussel Mytilus edulis L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60, 10351037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. A., 1981. Byssus thread strength in the mussel, Mytilus edulis. Journal of Zoology, 194, 245255.Google Scholar
Seed, R., 1976. Ecology. In Marine Mussels: Their Ecology and Physiology (ed. Bayne, B. L.), pp. 1366. Cambridge University Press. [International Biological Programme 10.]Google Scholar
Southward, A. J., 1953. The ecology of some rocky shores in the south of the Isle of Man. Proceedings of the Liverpool Biological Society, 59, 150.Google Scholar
Southward, A. J. & Orton, J. H., 1954. The effects of wave-action on the distribution and numbers of the commoner plants and animals living on the Plymouth break-water. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 33, 119.Google Scholar
Van Winkle, W. JR., 1970. Effect of environmental factors on byssal thread formation. Marine Biology, 7, 143148.Google Scholar