Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:05:53.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amphipods (Crustacea: Amphipoda) associated with red algae (Rhodophyta) in Kandalaksha Bay (the White Sea, Russia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2011

Ekaterina F. Uryupova ,
Vassily A. Spiridonov  and
Dmitry G. Zhadan
Ekaterina F. Uryupova*
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
Vassily A. Spiridonov
Affiliation:
P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nakhimovsky Prospekt, 36, Moscow, 117997, Russia
Dmitry G. Zhadan
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: E.F. Uryupova, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Amphipods' assemblages living in the red algae communities were studied in Velikaya Salma Strait (Kandalaksha Bay, north-western White Sea) in the depth range of 3–11 m. Sampling sites were located along the depth and shore exposure gradients in the areas with a significant number of rhodophytes. In total 12 species of amphipods were found with Ampithoe rubricata and Crassicorophium bonellii being most common and abundant. Gammaropsis melanops and Pleusymtes glaber were revealed as subdominant species. As an algal grazer A. rubricata appeared to be the species most closely associated with various algal assemblages. Crassicorophium bonellii were found on substrates being a deposit feeder predominantly inhabiting mixed assemblages of red algae where deposition and accumulation of seston most likely took place. Gammaropsis melanops and P. glaber are known as grazers but they preferred the habitats with both red algae and sponges. None of the species can be considered as obligate inhabitants of red algae hosts. Ampithoe rubricata and C. bonellii occurred in red algae communities in the shallow area (about 4 m). The most diverse and quantitatively rich amphipod assemblages were found at depths of 8–9 m in the area protected from waves and surf by the islands. Three of the most common and abundant species A. rubricata, C. bonellii and P. glaber are considered as amphiboreal while most of the species associated with rhodophytes belong to the Arctic-boreal ones. Amphiboreal species are presumably adapted to a broader temperature-range, in particular to higher summer temperature, than the Arctic-boreal species; they most likely have an advantage when occupying biotopes at shallow subtidal depth with local conditions in the White Sea.

Keywords

Amphipodared algaeArctic-boreal and amphiboreal distributiontrophic niches
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 265 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amsler, M.O., McClintock, J.B., Amsler, C.D., Angus, R.A. and Baker, B.J. (2009) An evaluation of sponge-associated amphipods from the Antarctic Peninsula. Antarctic Science 21, 579–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, J.L. and Karaman, G.S. (1991) The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda (except marine gammaroids). Records of the Australian Museum 13, 1–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, V.Ya. and Naumov, A.D. (2001) General features. In Berger, V.Ya. and Dahle, S. (eds) White Sea. Ecology and environment. St Petersburg and Tromsø: Derzhavets Publisher, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
Bousfield, E.L. and Hoover, P.M. (1997) The amphipod superfamily Corophioidea on the Pacific coast of North America. Part V. Family Corophiidae: Corophiinae, new subfamily. Systematics and distributional ecology. Amphipacifica II, 67–140.Google Scholar
Bray, J.R. and Curtis, J.T. (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27, 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulycheva, A.I. (1957) Amphipoda fauna of the White Sea. Volume 1. Records of the complex investigation of the White Sea. Moscow and Leningrad: Zoological Institute of AS USSR Publishing House. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Bussell, J.A., Lucas, I.A.N. and Seed, R. (2007) Patterns in the invertebrate assemblage associated with Corallina officinalis in tide pools. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernovskaya, E.N. (1956) Hydrological and hydrochemical conditions at the littoral of East Murman and the White Sea. Moscow and Leningrad: Nauka. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Christie, H., Jorgensen, N.M., Norderhaug, K.M. and Waage-Nielson, E. (2003) Species distribution and habitat exploitation of fauna associated with kelp (Laminaria hyperborea) along the Norwegian coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 687–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlan, K.E. (1994) Amphipod crustaceans and environmental disturbance: a review. Journal of Natural History 28, 519–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, R.M. (1997) Differences in composition of small, motile invertebrate assemblages from seagrass and unvegetated habitats in a southern Australian estuary. Hydrobiologia 346, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, A.B. and Chapman, A.R.O. (1991) Feeding preferences of gammarid amphipods among four species of Fucus. Marine Biology 109, 503–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunstone, M.A., O'Connor, R.J. and Seed, R. (1997) The epifaunal communities of Pelvetia canaliculata and Fucus spiralis. Holarctic Ecology 2, 6–11.Google Scholar
Dvoretsky, A.G. (2008) Symbionts and foulers of the red king crab in the Barents Sea. In Matishov, G.G. (ed.) Biology and physiology of the red king crab from the coastal zone of the Barents Sea. Apatity: Kola Science Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences Publishing, pp. 105–131. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Espinosa, F. and Guerra-García, H.M. (2005) Algae, macrofaunal assemblages and temperature: a quantitative approach to intertidal ecosystems of Iceland. Helgoland Marine Research 59, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, G.D. and Steele, D.H. (1983) Amphipods of Placentia Bay, Newfoundland. Occasional Papers in Biology 7, 1–22.Google Scholar
Golikov, A.A. (1985) Studies on the distribution and ecology of Amphipoda of Onega Bay of the White Sea. In Ecosystems of Onega Bay of the White Sea. Explorations of the faunas of the seas, 33(41). Leningrad: Zoological Institute of Academy of Sciences of USSR, pp. 150–170. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Grese, I.I. (1977) Amphipoda of the Black Sea and their biology. Kiev: Naukova Dumka. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Grishankov, A.V., Ninburg, E.A. and Shkliarevich, G.A. (2000) Macrozoobenthos of the Kandalakshsky Nature Reserve, White Sea aquatory (an annotated list of species). Flora and Fauna of Zapovedniks (Nature Reserves of Russian Federation) 83, 1–74. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Gurjanova, E.F. (1951) Amphipods of the USSR seas and contiguous waters (Amphipoda–Gammaridea). Volume 41. Moscow and Leningrad: Academy of Science of USSR Publishing House. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T. and Ryan, P.D. (2001) Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4, 1–9.Google Scholar
Huang, Y.M., Amsler, M.O., McClintock, J.B., Amsler, C.D. and Baker, B.J. (2007) Patterns of gammaridean amphipod abundance and species composition associated with dominant subtidal macroalgae from the western Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biology 30, 1417–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, D. and Guerra-García, J.M. (2010) Distribution patterns of the peracarid crustaceans associated with the alga Corallina elongata along the intertidal rocky shores of the Iberian Peninsula. Helgoland Marine Research. doi: 10.1007/s10152-010-0219-yGoogle Scholar
Jacobucci, G.B., Tanaka, M.O. and Leite, F.P.P. (2009) Temporal variation of amphipod assemblages associated with Sargassum filipendula (Phaeophyta) and its epiphytes in a subtropical shore. Aquatic Ecology 43, 1031–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kley, A., Kinzler, W., Schank, Y., Mayer, G., Waloszek, D. and Maier, G. (2009) Influence of substrate preference and complexity on co-existence of two non-native gammarideans (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Aquatic Ecology 43, 1047–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubitz, D.R. (1979) Phylogenetic relationships of the Podoceridae (Amphipoda, Gammaridea). Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington 3, 144–152.Google Scholar
Lippert, H., Iken, K., Rachor, E. and Wiencke, C. (2001) Macrofauna associated with macroalgae in the Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen). Polar Biology 24, 512–522.Google Scholar
Luizzi, M.G. and Gappa, J.L. (2011) Algae as hosts for epifaunal bryozoans: role of functional groups and taxonomic relatedness. Journal of Sea Research 65, 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magurran, A.E. (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Makkaveeva, E.B. (1959) Biocenose of Cystoseira barbata Ag. (Wor.) in coastal part of the Black Sea. Proceedings of the Sevastopol Biological Station 12, 168–191. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Makkaveeva, E.B. (1963) Algae beds biocenoses of the Mediterranean Sea. Proceedings of the Sevastopol Biological Station 16, 201–210. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Makkaveeva, E.B. (1967) The role of the macrophyta and ecologic factors in forming of algae beds biocenoses species. In Vodyanitskiy, V.A. (ed.) The bottom biocenoses and biology of benthic organisms of the Black Sea. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, pp. 52–61. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Martin, W.J. and Davis, G.E. (2001) An update classification of the recent Crustacea. Contributions in Science 39, 35–37, 66–68.Google Scholar
McDonald, S.P. and Bingham, B.L. (2010) Comparing macroalgal food and habitat choice and sympatric, tube-building amphipods, Ampithoe lacertosa and Peramphithoe humeralis. Marine Biology 157, 1513–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, A.A. (1993) Dispersal and endemicity in gammaridean Amphipoda. Journal of Natural History 27, 901–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ninburg, E.A., Ivanuyshina, E.A. and Aleksandrov, D.A. (1986) On the biology of amphipod Corophium bonelli M.-Edw. and Caprella linearis (L.) in the White Sea. Bulletin of St Petersburg University 3, 111–113. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Norderhaug, K.M. (2004) Use of red algae as hosts by kelp-associated amphipods. Marine Biology 144, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piepenburg, D., Archambault, P., Ambrose, W.G., Blanchard, A.L., Bluhm, B.A., Carroll, M.L., Conlan, C.E., Cusson, M., Feder, H.M., Grebmeier, J.M., Jewett, S.C., Lévesque, M., Petryashev, V.V., Sejr, M.K., Sirenko, B.I. and Włodarska-Kowalczuk, M. (2011) Towards a pan-Arctic inventory of the species diversity of the macro- and megabenthic fauna of the Arctic shelf seas. Marine Biodiversity 45, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poore, G.B.A. (2004) Spatial associations among algae affect host use in a herbivorous marine amphipod. Oecologia 140, 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poore, G.B.A., Watson, M.J., de Nys, R., Lowry, J.K. and Steinberg, P.D. (2000) Patterns of host use among algae- and sponge-associated amphipods. Marine Ecology Progress Series 208, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaelli, D. (2000) Interactions between macro-algal and invertebrates in the Ythan estuary, Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Helgoland Marine Research 54, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichert, K., Buchholz, F., Bartsch, I., Kersten, T. and Giménez, L. (2008) Scale-dependent patterns of variability in species assemblages of the rocky intertidal at Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 88, 1319–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowntree, V.J. (1996) Feeding, distribution and reproductive behavior of cyamids (Crustacea, Amphipoda) living on humpback and right whales. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rybnikov, P.V. (1993) Spatial organization of zooepibiota community of Phyllophora nervosa on the rocky sublittoral zone of the Black Sea. In Turpaeva, E.P. (ed.) Biology of Black Sea agarophyta. Moscow: P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanography of the Russian Academy of Science, pp. 113–122. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Scipione, M.B. (1999) Amphipod biodiversity in the foliar stratum of shallow water Posidonia oceanica beds in the Mediterranean Sea. In Schram, F.R. and Vaupel Klein, J.C. von (eds) Crustacea and biodiversity crisis. Leiden: Brill, pp. 649–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepúlveda, R., Cancino, J.M. and Thiel, M. (2003) The paracarid epifauna associated with the ascidian Pyura chilensis (Molina, 1782) (Ascidiacea: Pyuridae). Journal of Natural History 37, 1555–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirenko, B.I. (2001) List of species of free-living invertebrates of Eurasian Arctic seas and adjacent deep waters. St Petersburg: Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Skutch, A.F. (1926) On the habits and ecology of the tube-building amphipod Ampithoe rubricata Montagu. Ecology 7, 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiridonov, V.A., Kosobokova, K.N., Malyutin, O.I., Petryashov, V.V., Pertsova, N.M., Bek, T.A., Uryupova, E.F., Neretin, N.Yu., Sinelnikov, S.Yu. and Kuz'min, A.A. (2010) Phylum Arthropoda, subphylum Crustacea. In Tzetlin, A.B., Zhadan, A.E. and Marfenin, N.N. (eds) Flora and fauna of the White Sea. Illustrated atlas. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press, pp. 240–283. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Tchesunov, A.V., Kalyakina, N.M. and Bubnova, E.N. (2008) Species list of biota of N.A. Pertsov Biological Station of Moscow State University. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Uryupova, E.F. (2005) SEM mouthparts morphology of four amphipod species—dwellers of red algae beds in the White Sea. Arthropoda Selecta 14, 291–296.Google Scholar
Vader, W. (1978) Associations between amphipods and echinoderms. Astarte 11, 123–134.Google Scholar
Vader, W. and Beehler, C.L. (1983) Metopa glacialis (Amphipoda, Stenothoidae) in the Barents and Beaufort Seas, and its association with the lamellibranchs Musculus niger and M. discors s.l. Astarte 12, 57–61.Google Scholar
Vader, W. and Lönning, S. (1973) Physiological adaptations in associated amphipods. A comparative study of tolerance to sea anemones in four species of Lysianassidae. Sarsia 53, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valério-Berardo, M.T. and Flynn, M.N. (2002) Composition and seasonality of an amphipod community associated to the algae. Brazilian Journal of Biology 62(4A), 735–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinogradov, G.M. and Kobuzeva, I.A. (2006) Contemporary condition of bottom communities of the Kovda Inlet. 2. Outer part of the inlet. Proceedings of the N.A. Pertsov White Sea Biological Station of the Moscow University 10, 44–55. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Wildish, D.J. and Peer, D. (1983) Tidal current speed and production of benthic macrofauna in the lower Bay of Fundy. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinova, A.D. (1955) Key to red algae of the northern seas of the USSR. Moscow and Leningrad: Academy of Science of USSR Publishing House. [In Russian.]Google Scholar