Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:18:17.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age, growth and maturation of the European squid Loligo vulgaris (Myopsida, Loliginidae) on the west Saharan shelf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Alexander Arkhipkin
Alexander Arkhipkin
Affiliation:
Atlantic Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography, 5 Dmitry Donskoy Street, Kaliningrad 236000, Russia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Age, growth and maturation of Loligo vulgaris were studied by examination of growth increments within statoliths of 294 specimens (mantle length, ML, ranging from 31 to 498 mm) caught on the west Saharan shelf between 1985 and 1988. Maximum age was 335 d (290 mm ML) for females, and 396 d (498 mm ML) for males. Growth rates varied considerably among individuals with a greater range in males. Sexual dimorphism in length was apparent after about 210 d. Males and females diverged considerably in weight, with males reaching a greater weight after about 180 d. Growth in length between 124 and 396 d was best described by a power function, while growth in weight was best described by the Gompertz function. Males started maturing at 180–210 d and mature males ranged in age between 250 and 396 d; while females started maturing at 240–270 d and mature females ranged between 285 and 335 d. Loligo vulgaris hatched throughout the year with two distinct peaks; in winter (December - early March) and summer (June-July). The life cycle of L. vulgaris populations on the west Saharan shelf lasts ~1 y, with large males (>450 mm ML) living slightly longer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , August 1995 , pp. 593 - 604
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkhipkin, A.I., 1993. Age, growth, stock structure and migratory rate of pre-spawning shortfinned squid Illex argentinus based on statolith ageing investigations. Fisheries Research, 16, 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkhipkin, A. & Nekludova, N., 1993. Age, growth and maturation of the loliginid squids Alloteuthis africana and A. subulata on the west African shelf. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 73, 949–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boletzky, S. Von, 1987. Embryonic phase. In Cephalopod life cycles. Vol. II. Comparative reviews (ed. P.R., Boyle), pp. 5–31. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Burukovskii, R.N., Zuev, G.V., Nigmatullin, Ch.M. & Tsymbal, M.A., 1977. Methodical bases for working out the scales of reproductive system maturity in the squid females, Sthenoteuthis pteropus (Cephalopoda, Ommastrephidae) taken as an example. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 56, 1781–1791. [In Russian with English summary.]Google Scholar
Clarke, M.R., 1978. The cephalopod statolith - an introduction to its form. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 701–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cort, Basilio J.L. & Péerez-Gándaras, Pedrosa G., 1973. Estudios de pesca de los cefalópodos (Octopus vulgaris, Sepia officinalis hierredda y Loligo vulgaris) del banco pesquero sahariano. Boletin del Instituto Españnol de Oceanographia, 173, 1–63.Google Scholar
Dawe, E.G. & Natsukari, Y., 1991. Light microscopy. In Squid age determination using statoliths (ed. P., Jereb et al.), pp. 83–96. Mazara del Vallo, NTR-ITPP. Special publications no.l.Google Scholar
Hixon, R.F. & Villoch, M.R., 1983. Growth rings in the statoliths of young laboratory cultured squids (Loligo opalescens). American Malacological Bulletin, 2, 93.Google Scholar
Jackson, G.D., 1990a. The use of tetracycline staining techniques to determine statolith growth ring periodicity in the tropical loliginid squids Loliolus noctiluca and Loligo chinensis. Veliger, 33, 389–393.Google Scholar
Jackson, G.D., 1990b. Age and growth of the tropical nearshore loliginid squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana determined from statolith growth-ring analysis. Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, DC, 88, 113–118.Google Scholar
Jackson, G.D. & Choat, J.H., 1992. Growth in tropical cephalopods: an analysis based on statolith microstructure. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, 218–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinoshita, T., 1989. Age and growth of loliginid squid, Heterololigo bleekeri. Bulletin of the Seikai Region Fisheries Research Laboratory, 67, 59–68. [In Japanese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Lipinski, M.R., 1986. Methods for the validation of squid age from statoliths. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 66, 505–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangold-Wirz, K., 1963. Biologie des Céphalopodes benthiques et nectoniques de la Mer Catalane. Vie et Milieu, supplement no. 13, pp. 1–285.Google Scholar
Mertsalova, N.B., ed., 1964. Hydrometeorological guide of the waters of west African coast. Leningrad: Hydrometeorological Press.Google Scholar
Natsukari, Y. & Komine, N., 1992. Age and growth estimation of the European squid, Loligo vulgaris, based on statolith microstructure. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 72, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsukari, Y., Nakanose, T. & Oda, K., 1988. Age and growth of the loliginid squid Photololigo edulis (Hoyle, 1885). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 116, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesis, K.N., 1987. Cephalopods of the world. Neptune City: TFH Publications.Google Scholar
Raja, M., 1935. Ricerche sulláccrescimento postembrionale del Loligo vulgaris Lam. Archivio Zoologico Italiano. Torino, 21, 447–501.Google Scholar
Ricker, W.E., 1958. Handbook of computation for biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin of the Fishery Research Board of Canada, no. 119, pp. 1–300.Google Scholar
Roper, C.F.E., Sweeney, M.J. & Nauen, C.E., 1984. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 3. Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. Fisheries Synopsis. FAO, no. 125, 277 pp.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, L. & Verwey, J., 1945. Zur biologie von Loligo vulgaris Lam. Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie, 7, 213–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk, P.E., Hanlon, R.T., Bradford, L.A. & Yang, W.T., 1986. Aspects of feeding, growth and survival of the European squid Loligo vulgaris Lamarck, 1799, reared through the early growth stages. Vie et Milieu, 36, 9–13.Google Scholar
Worms, J., 1983. Loligo vulgaris. In Cephalopod life cycles. Vol. I. Species accounts (ed. P.R., Boyle), pp. 143–157. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar